A semi-open supervision systems model for evaluating staff supervision in adult care settings: a conceptual framework

References

• Allen, R., Gilbert, P., & Onyett, S. (2009). Leadership for personalisation and social inclusion in mental health ( Adult services report 27). London: SCIE.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (2004). Reasons and rationalisations: The limits of organisational knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, E., Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M. S. (2016). Towards an international consensus on a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi study. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1568–1586. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2007). The changing roles and tasks of social work from service users’ perspectives: A literature informed discussion paper. London: Shaping our Lives National User Network.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & McKnight, K. (2005). Clinical supervision in social work, a review of the research literature. Clinical Supervisor, 24(1/2), 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., Higham, B., Elliot, J., & O’Hanlon, C. (2012). Professional culture conflicts: Change issues in public service delivery community university. UEA paper (University of East Anglia). Retrieved February 25, 2018, from http://www.benhighamconsulting.com/pdfs/pcc%20print.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, R. (2012). Systems thinking, organisational change and agency: A practice theory critique of Senge’s learning organisationa. Journal of Change Management. dio:10.1080/14697017.2011.647923
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. S. W., Webb, C. M., & Bostock, L. (2013). The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice (2000–2012). Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1843–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Webb, C., Bostock, L., & Coomber, C. (2012). Effective supervision in social work and social care. London: SCIE.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S. (2012). A rough guide to personalisation. London: SCIE.
   Google Scholar
• Conneely, E., & Garrett, P. M. (2015). Social workers and social justice during a period of intensive neoliberalization: A preliminary investigation from the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 26 (2), 126–147. doi: 10.1080/10428232.2015.1017914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davys, A., & Beddoe, E. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision a guide for helping professionals. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (DH). (2012). Caring for our future, reforming care and support ( Cm 8378). London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, P., & Lodge, G. (2013). Welfare states after the crisis: Changing public attitudes. Retrieved from http://www.policy-network.net
   Google Scholar
• Dustin, D. (2007). The McDonaldization of social work. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street level bureaucracy. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauth, R., & Mahdon, M. (2007). Improving social and health care services ( People and management review 16). London: SCIE.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R. (2013). Narrative summary of the evidence review of supervision of social workers and social care workers in a range of settings including integrated settings. London: SCIE.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, H. (2012). The purpose and duration of supervision, and the training and discipline of supervisors: What social workers say they need to provide effective services. The British Journal of Social Work, 2012, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Harris. (2013). Retrieved from http://blog.oup.com/2013/03/world-social-work-day-neoliberalism/
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, A. (1978). Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Social Casework, 59(8), 465–476.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K. (2014). Social work theories in context, creating frameworks for practice (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-of-social-work/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Stevens, M., & Sharpe, E. (2013). Content and purpose of supervision in social work practice in England: Views of newly qualified social workers, managers and directors. British Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct102
   Google Scholar
• Milne, D., Aylott, H., Fitzpatrick, H., & Ellis, M. V. (2008). How does clinical supervision work? Using a best evidence synthesis approach to construct a basic model of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 170–190. doi: 10.1080/07325220802487915
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2010). The Munro review on child protection: Part 1. A systems analysis. London: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report, a child-centred system ( CM 8062). London: Stationery Office. ISBN 9780101806220
   Google Scholar
• Netten, A., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Fernandez, J. L., Challis, D., Glendinning, C., … Wilberforce, M. (2011). Personalisation through individual budgets: Does it work and for whom? The British Journal of Social Work, 1–18. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, K. (2015). Issues and challenges facing social work supervision in the twenty-first century. China Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 136–149. doi: 10.1080/17525098.2015.1039172
   Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M. S. (2015). Social work supervision research (1970–2010): The way we were and the way ahead. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 616–633. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2002). The politics of systems theory within social work. Journal of Social Work, 2(3), 269–292. doi: 10.1177/146801730200200302
   Google Scholar
• Richards, S. (1992). Changing patterns of legitimation in public management. Public Policy and Administration, 7(3), 15–28. doi: 10.1177/095207679200700302
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S., Rosen, R., & Rumbold, B. (2011). What is integrated care? London: Nuffield Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds, R. (2009). Understanding the ‘differentiated consumer’ in public services. In R. Simmonds, M. Powell, & I. Greener (Eds.), The consumer in public services choice, values and difference (Chapter 4, pp. 57–76). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skills for Care and CWDC. (2007). Providing effective supervision: A workforce development tool, including a unit of competence and supporting guidance.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, M. (2005). Social work supervision, context and concepts. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., Ruch, G., Lymberly, M., & Cooper, A. (2008). Social work: An introduction to contemporary practice. Essex: Longman.
   Google Scholar