Evaluating effectiveness in social work: sharing dilemmas in practice

References

• Ayre, P. (2001). Child protection and the media: Lessons from the last three decades. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 887–901. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/31.6.887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balthasar, A. (2011). Critical friend approach: Policy evaluation between methodological soundness, practical relevance and transparency of the evaluation process. German Policy Studies, 7(3), 187–231.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). Real world evaluation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2011). Ethics in an age of austerity: Social work and the evolving New Public Management’. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 5–23. doi: 10.18352/jsi.260
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (1994). Objective science or social interaction? Researching users’ views of services. Research, Policy and Planning, 12(2), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Baszanger, I., & Dodier, N. (2003). Ethnography: Relating the part to the whole. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice (pp. 9–34). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247. doi: 10.2307/799147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2001). Damned lies and statistics. Untangling numbers from the media, politicians and activists. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2007). In defense of being 'native': The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 59–74. doi: 10.1177/1094428106289253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X034006003
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham, J., Fuller, R., McIvor, G., & Petch, A. (1992). Evaluating social work effectiveness. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham, J., & Mansoor, A.F.K. (1998). The working of social work. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham, J., Mullen, E., Soydan, H., & Tengvald, K. (1998). Evaluation as a tool in the development of social work discourse. Evaluation, 4(1), 9–24. doi: 10.1177/13563899822208356
   Google Scholar
• Chiappelli, F., Brant, X. M. C., & Oluwadara, O. O. (Eds.). (2010). Evidence-based practice: toward optimizing clinical outcomes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Mitchie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new medical research council guidance. British Medical Journal, 337(7676), 979–983.
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E. (2009). The changing nature of social work. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work. Themes issues and critical debates (3rd ed., pp. 26–36). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E. (2014). Stigma in health and social work: Towards a new paradigm. In E. Beddoe & J. Maidment (Eds.), Social work practice for promoting health and wellbeing: Critical issues. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cree, V. E., Jain, S., & Hillen, D. P. (2016). The challenge of measuring effectiveness in social work: A case study of an evaluation of a drug and alcohol referral service in Scotland. British Journal of Social Work, 46(1), 277–293. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S., Hubbard, A., & Munro, E. (2010). Reclaiming social work, London borough of hackney children and young people’s services. London: Human Reliability and LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt, A., & Hardiker, P. (1996). Evaluating for good practice. Birmingham: BASW.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I., & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work. Making a difference. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (Eds.). (2003). Reflexivity. A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J. (1978). Toward effective casework practice: An eclectic approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. (1999). Social work research, social work knowledge and the research assessment exercise. In B. Broad (Ed.), The politics of social work research and evaluation (pp. 91–108). Birmingham: Venture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2007). Uncertainty: The defining characteristic of social work? In M. Lymbery & K. Postle (Eds.), Social work. A companion to learning (pp. 30–39). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. (2002). Evaluating practice. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Critical practice in social work (pp. 46–54). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Galvani, S. (2012). Supporting people with alcohol and drug problems. Making a difference. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607.
   Google Scholar
• Gomm, R., Needham, G., & Bullman, A. (2000). Evaluating research in health and social care. London: Open University and Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2009). Evidence based social work. A critical stance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 4, 1–25. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., & Devaney, J. (2004). Accessing social work case files for research purposes. Some issues and problems. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 3(3), 313–333. doi: 10.1177/1473325004045667
   Google Scholar
• Hillen, D. P., Cree, V. E., & Jain, S. (2014). Facilitating recovery from drug and alcohol problems in social work practice – reflections on interviews with service users in Scotland. Practice: Social Work in Action, 26(5), 281–297. doi: 10.1080/09503153.2014.958453
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, P. M. (2002). Achieving excellence in the management of human service organizations. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lishman, J. (Ed.). (1984). Evaluation (research highlights in social work). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, G., & Sheldon, B. (1992). Contemporary studies of the effectiveness of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 22(6), 614–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, M., O'Donnell, C., Halliday, E., Sridharan, S., & Platt, S. (2010). Evaluating complex interventions: One size does not fit all. British Medical Journal, 340(7743), 401–403.
   Google Scholar
• Malley, J., & Fernández, J.-L. (2010). Measuring quality in social care services: Theory and practice. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(4), 559–582. ISSN 1370-4788. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00422.x
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. E., & Timms, N. (1970). The client speaks: Working class impressions of casework. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, S., & Wallace, A. (1982). Verdicts on social work. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, M. E. (1913). A study of nine hundred and eighty-five widows known to certain charity organization societies in 1910. New York: Charity Organization, Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, M. E. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, S. (2010). Social work. The rise and fall of a profession? Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2008). The road to recovery: A new approach to tackling Scotland’s drug problem. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2009a). Changing Scotland’s relationship with alcohol: A framework for action. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2009b). An outcomes toolkit for alcohol and drugs partnerships (Version 1) provides guidance on working towards an outcomes approach for ‘alcohol and drug partnerships’ across scotland. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2011). Evaluating in practice. Ashgate: Farnham.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Shaw, A. (1997). Keeping social work honest. Evaluating as profession and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 27(6), 847–869. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (evaluation in education and human services) (2nd ed.). New York City, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L. (1996). Social work research: The state of the art (or science). Child & Family Social Work, 1(4), 233–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.1996.tb00029.x
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L. (2000). Evidence-based practice in social work and probation. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal (pp. 138–162). Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. (2001). Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 57–79. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/31.1.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Wastell, D., Broadhurst, K., & Hall, C. (2010). When policy o’erleaps itself: The tragic tale of the integrated children’s system. Critical Social Policy, 30, 405–429. doi: 10.1177/0261018310367675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore, E. (2001). “People listened to what we had to say”: reflections on an emancipatory qualitative evaluation. In I. Shaw & N. Gould (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 83–99). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice (pp. 177–199). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar