Systemic supervision in statutory social work in the UK: systemic rucksacks and bells that ring

References

• Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in the ‘risk society’. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1279–1296. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostock, L., Forrester, D., Patrizo, L., Godfrey, T., Zonouzi, M., Antonopoulou, V., … Tinarwo, M. (2017). Scaling and deepening the reclaiming social work model, evaluation report. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bownas, J., & Fredman, G. (Eds.). (2016). Working with embodiment in supervision: A systemic approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, G., Engelbrecht, L., & Höjer, S. (2010). ‘Supervision: A force for change? Three stories told’. International Social Work, 53(6), 773–790. doi: 10.1177/0020872809358401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, J. (1992). Approach, method, technique: Making distinctions and creating connections. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 3(1), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, J. (2005). Relational reflexivity: A tool for socially constructing therapeutic relationships. In C. Flaskas, B. Mason, & A. Perlesz (Eds.), The space between: Experience, context and process in the therapeutic relationship (pp. 1–17). London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, J., 2010. Creating reflexive relationships between practices of systemic supervision and theories of learning and education. In C. Burck & G. Daniel (Eds.), Mirrors and reflections: Processes of systemic supervision (pp. 49–78). London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Webb, C. M., & Bostock, L. (2013). ‘The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice’ (2000–2012). Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1843–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S., Hubbard, A., & Munro, E. (2010). Reclaiming social work: London borough of hackney children and young people’s services, parts 1 and 2. London: Human Reliability Associates and London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, L. (2013). in Cooper, J. Stress-busting Hackney model under threat from cherry picking councils, Community Care. http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2013/07/16/stress-busting-hackney-model-under-threat-from-cherry-picking-councils/
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (1991). Child abuse: A study of inquiry reports 1980–1989. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dugmore, P. (2014). Working together, or keeping apart? A critical discourse analysis of the revised working together guidance (2013). Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(3), 329–341. doi: 10.1080/02650533.2014.925863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, D. (2016) What, when, why and how: Zombie Social Work and the need for a new narrative. In Enver Solomon (Ed.), Rethinking children’s services fit for the future? (pp. 8–13). London: NCB.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, D., Westlake, D., McCann, M., Thurnham, A., Shefer, G., Glynn, G., & Killian, M. (2013). Reclaiming social work? An evaluation of systemic units as an approach to delivering children’s services. Luton: Tilda Goldberg Centre, University of Bedfordshire.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S., Trowler, I., & Munro, E. (2012). Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice. Jessica: Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hare (2013). in Cooper, J. Stress-busting Hackney model under threat from cherry picking councils, Community Care. http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2013/07/16/stress-busting-hackney-model-under-threat-from-cherry-picking-councils/
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, R. (2013). Emotions, social work practice and supervision: An uneasy alliance? Journal of Social Work Practice, 27(1), 5–19. doi: 10.1080/02650533.2012.745842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob, P. (2006). Bringing non-violent resistance to Britain. Context, 84, 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1988). The process of experiential learning. In D. Kolb (Ed.), Experience as the source of learning and development (pp. 31–61). London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Koltz, R. L., Odegard, M. A., Feit, S. S., Provost, K., & Smith, T. (2012). Parallel process and isomorphism: A model for decision making in the supervisory triad. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 20(3), 233–238. doi: 10.1177/1066480712448788
   Google Scholar
• Laming, H. (2003) The Victoria climbie inquiry report. London. TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, P., Little, M., & Cronen, V. (1990). The systemic professional: Domains of action and the question of neutrality. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 1(1), 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, P., & McAdam, E. (2013). Appreciative work in schools: Generating future communities. Chichester: Kingsham Press.
   Google Scholar
• London Borough of Brent (1985) A child in trust: Report of the panel of inquiry investigating the circumstances surrounding the death of Jasmine Beckford. London: London Borough of Brent.
   Google Scholar
• Manojlovic, J., & Partridge, K. (2001). A framework for systemic consultation with acute ward systems. Clinical Psychology, 3, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, B. (2015). Towards positions of safe uncertainty. InterAction: The Journal of Solution Focus in Organisations, 7(1), 28–43.
   Google Scholar
• Measures, P. (2012). in McNicolls, The Hackney model threatens to hinder social work more than it helps, Community Care http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/mental-health/2012/07/the-hackney-model-threatens-to/
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C. L., Coudou, F., & Maturana, H. R. (1988). The bringing forth of pathology. The Irish Journal of Psychology., 9(1), 144–172. doi: 10.1080/03033910.1988.10557711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. (1997). ‘Emotionally competent child protection organizations: Fallacy, fiction or necessity’. In J. Bates, R. Pugh, & N. Thompson (Eds.), Protecting children: Challenges and change (pp. 193–211). Aldershot: Arena.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. (2005). Staff supervision in social care: Making a real difference for staff and service users. Brighton: Pavilion Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. (2009). Supervision guide for social workers. Leeds: Children’s Workforce Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report-a child-centred approach (Vol. 8062). London: The Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, K. (2010). Systemic supervision in agency contexts: An evolving conversation with clinical psychologists in a mental health trust. In C. Burck & G. Daniel (Eds.), Mirrors and reflections: Processes in systemic supervision (pp. 309–335). London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Pendry, N. (2012) Systemic practice in a risk management context, In S. Goodman & I. Trowler (Eds.), Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice (pp. 26–33). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Penman, R. (1997). The researcher in communication: The primary research position. In J. L. Owen (Ed.), Conext and communication behaviour (pp. 337–351). Reno, NV: Context Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, K. (1997). The bells that ring: A process for group supervision. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 18(4), 217–220. doi: 10.1002/j.1467-8438.1997.tb00299.x
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2012). Where have all the feelings gone? Developing reflective and relationship-based management in child-care social work. British Journal of Social Work, 42(7), 1315–1332. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Iossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., & Aaltonen, J. (2011). The comprehensive open-dialogue approach in Western Lapland: II. Long-term stability of acute psychosis outcomes in advanced community care. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches, 3, 192–204. doi: 10.1080/17522439.2011.595819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidebotham, P., Brandon, M., Bailey, S., Belderson, P., Dodsworth, J., Garstang, J., Harrison, E., Retzer, A. and Sorensen, P. (2016) Pathways to harm, pathways to protection: A triennial analysis of serious case reviews 2011 to 2014. Final report. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Social Work Reform Board. (2011). Building a safe and confident future: One year on – progress report from the Social Work Reform Board. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Social Work Reform Board (2012) Standards for Employers and Supervision Framework. http://www.local.gov.uk/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=7e6d2140-fc0e-47cd-8b2f-2375812700ad&groupId=10171
   Google Scholar
• Stratton, P. (2005). A model to coordinate understanding of active autonomous learning. Journal of Family Therapy, 27(3), 217–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2005.00313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnell, A. (2012). The signs of safety comprehensive briefing paper. Perth: Resolutions Consultancy.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D., Forrester, D., & Grant, L. (2016). What happens in child and family social work supervision? Child and Family Social Work, 22, 942–951. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar