References

• Alaszewski, A., & Coxon, K. (2009). Uncertainty in everyday life: Risk, worry and trust. Health, Risk and Society, 11(3), 201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, L., & Ahrenkiel, A. (2003). Læringsrum i det sociale arbejde [Learning in social work]. Publisher AKF (Report). Retrieved from http://www.kora.dk/udgivelser/udgivelse/i7658/Laeringsrum-i-det-sociale-arbejde
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in ‘the risk society’. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1279–1296. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L., Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M.-S. (2016). Towards an international consensus on a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi Study. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 1568–1586. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, G., & Hojer, S. (2009). Supervision reviewed: Reflections on two different social work models in England and Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 12(1), 71–85. doi: 10.1080/13691450802220990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byriel, C., & Damgaard, I. (1999). Introduktion til Supervision [Introduction to supervision]. Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Webb, C., Bostock, L., & Coomber, C. (2012). Effective supervision in social work and social care (SCIE Research Briefing 43). Retrieved from scie.org.uk. Website: http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/briefings/briefing43/
   Google Scholar
• Collins-Camargo, C., & Millar, K. (2010). The potential for a more clinical approach to child welfare supervision to promote practice and case outcomes: A qualitative study in four states. The Clinical Supervisor, 29(2), 164–187. doi: 10.1080/07325223.2010.517491
   Google Scholar
• Collins-Camargo, C., & Royse, D. (2010). A study of the relationships among effective supervision, organizational culture promoting evidence-based practice, and worker self-efficacy in public child welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 4(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/15548730903563053
   Google Scholar
• Danish Union of Social Workers and Employers of Danish Regions. (2015). Socialrådgiveres erfaringer med supervision i regionerne – En undersøgelsesreport. [Social workers’ experiences with supervision in the [hospitals] regions – an inquiry]. Retrieved from socialraadgiverne.dk. Website: http://www.socialraadgiverne.dk/Files/Filer/04-Karriere/2015-03-04-UndersoegelsesrapportSupervision-iRegionerne.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, K., & Bogo, M. (2009). Moving beyond the administrative: Supervisors’ perspectives on clinical supervision in child welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(1), 87–105. doi: 10.1080/15548730802695105
   Google Scholar
• Egelund, T. (1999). Om nordisk supervisionsteori – teoretisk orientering og organisatorisk forankring [About Nordic supervision theory – theoretical perspectives and organizational anchoring]. Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid, (3), 138–148.
   Google Scholar
• Egelund, T. & Kvilhaug, A. (2001). Supervisionens organisering [The organization of supervision]. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, nr. 3, 180–200.
   Google Scholar
• Egelund, T., & Kvilhaug, A. (2002). Supervisionens mål – professionalisering og personalepleje [The goals of supervision – professionalism and human ressource]. Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid, 2, 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ellett, A. (2006). Personal and organizational correlates of outcomes in child welfare: Implications for supervision and continuing professional development. Professional Development: International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 9(2/3), 44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Fehmerling, H. (1999). Hvis supervision er svaret, hvad er så spørgsmålet? [If supervision is the answer, what is the question?]. Socialrådgiveren, 19, 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fehmerling, H. (2013). Supervision [Supervision]. In R. Porsborg, H. Nørrelykke, & H. Antczak, (Eds.), Socialrådgivning og socialt arbejde – en grundbog: Supervision [Social counselling and social work – a textbook] (pp. 531–554). Copenhagen: Socialpædagogisk Bibliotek, Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: USF (University of South Florida. Retrieved from http://ctndisseminationlibrary.org/PDF/nirnmonograph.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. (2001). Maintaining front-line workers in child protection: A case for refocusing supervision. Child Abuse Review, 10(5), 323–335. doi: 10.1002/car.707
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1994). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, R. P., Faller, K. C., Ortega, R. M., & Tropman, J. (2009). Exit interviews with departed child welfare workers: Preliminary findings. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(1), 40–63. doi: 10.1080/15548730802690833
   Google Scholar
• Gowdy, E. (1993). Program supervision: Facilitating staff participation in program analysis, planning, and change. Administration in Social Work, 17(3), 59–79. doi: 10.1300/J147v17n03_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, I., Field, R., & Brown, K. (2010). Effective leadership, management and supervision in health and social care. Exeter: Learning Matters Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Hammershøj, L. G. (2003). Selvdannelse og socialitet – forsøg på en socialanalytisk samtidsdiagnose [The Grand Tour and Socialisation: An attempt to make a socialanalysis about our time]. Copenhagen: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hammershøj, L. G. (2012). Kreativitet – et spørgsmål om dannelse [Creativity: a question of a grand tour]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, M. (2012). The effective child welfare unit supervisor. Administration in Social Work, 36(4), 409–425. doi: 10.1080/03643107.2011.604403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, D., & Hensley, H. (1991). Changing the focus of social work supervision: Effects on client satisfaction and generalized contentment. Social Work, 36(6), 506–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höjer, S., Beijer, E., & Wissö, T. (2007). Varför handledning? Handledning som professionellt projekt och organisatoriskt verktyg inom handikappomsorg och individ och familjeomsorg [Why Supervision? Supervision as a professional project and organizational tool within disabled and family care] (1st ed.). Göteborg: FoU i Väst.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. (2010). Solutions in supervision. Community Care, (1814), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, J. (2002). The impact of supervision on social worker perception of self-efficacy. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Albany, State University of New York ( pp. 1–95).
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. (1976). Supervision in social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, T. (2008). Training supervisors of practitioners: Analysis of efficacy. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(1), 76–96. doi: 10.1080/07325220802221538
   Google Scholar
• Leung, K. K. P. (2012). An exploration of the use of power in social work supervisory relationships in Hong Kong. Journal of Social Work Practice, 26(2), 151–162. doi: 10.1080/02650533.2010.536201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A. (2008). Implementation of group supervision in child welfare: Findings from Arizona’s supervision circle project. Child Welfare, 87(6), 31–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A. (2009). Critical thinking in child welfare supervision. Administration in Social Work, 34(1), 68–78. doi:10.1080/036431009034329 doi: 10.1080/03643100903432966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A., & Rounds, T. (2009). Strengths-based supervision: A child welfare supervision training project. The Clinical Supervisor, 28(2), 124–140. doi: 10.1080/07325220903334065
   Google Scholar
• Mackrill, T. (2011). Differentiating life goals and therapeutic goals: Expanding our understanding of the working alliance. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 39(1), 25–39. doi: 10.1080/03069885.2010.531382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, J. (2015). Outcomes of supervision in the field of children and young people with additional support needs (In Danish). Department of Social Work, University College Metropol, Report 16.
   Google Scholar
• Magnussen, J., & Leth Svendsen, I. (2018). ‘Getting there: heuristics and biases as rationing short cuts in professional childcare judgments and decision making – an integrative understanding’. Nordic Social Work Research, 8(1). doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2018.1427138
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J. (2011). Teaching the use of self through the process of clinical supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39(3), 301–307. doi: 10.1007/s10615-010-0304-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mena, K. C., & Bailey, J. D. (2007). The effects of the supervisory working alliance on worker outcomes. Journal of Social Service Research, 34(1), 55–65. doi: 10.1300/J079v34n01_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mor Barak, M. E., Travis, D. A., Pyun, H., & Xie, B. (2009). The impact of supervision on worker outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 83, 4–32. doi: 10.1086/599028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, A. (2008). Dirty Supervision – forbudte trin? [Dirty supervision: Forbidden steps?]. In J. Hassing Pedersen (Ed.), Perspektiver på supervision – en erhvervspsykologisk antologi [Perspectives on supervision: A work psychological anthology] (pp. 159–193). Copenhagen: Psykologisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, C. (2002). Handbook of clinical social work supervision (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M. (2013). Social work supervision research (1970–2010): The way we were and the way ahead. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 616–633. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (1996). What is professional social work? Birmingham: Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, B. (1986). A Co-operative exercise in accountability. In M. Marken, & M. Payne (Eds.), Enabling and ensuring: Supervision in practice. Leicester: National Youth Bureau and Council for Education and Training in Youth and Community Work.
   Google Scholar
• Rauktis, M. (1994). Maintaining social worker morale: When supportive supervision is not enough. Administration in Social Work, 18(1), 39–60. doi: 10.1300/J147v18n01_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1999). Understanding governance: comparing public sector reform in Britain and Denmark. (In Danish). The Democracy Project, Political Science Department, Copenhagen University.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, A. (1996). The supervision of child protection work. British Journal of Social Work, 26(3), 357–374. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman, L. (2005). The clinical-practitioner working alliance: A parallel process. Clinical Supervisor, 24(1/2), 23–47. The Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shackelford, K. (2003). AL-MS child protective service casework supervision. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work, 6(1/2), 40.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, M. (2008). Adventures in researching the features of social work supervision in Hong Kong. Qualitative Social Work, 7(3), 349–362. doi: 10.1177/1473325008093706
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, M., O’Donoghue, K., Boddy, J., & Pak, C. (2017). From supervision to organisational learning: A typology to integrate supervision, mentorship, consultation and coaching. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(8), 2406–2420. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook, T. M., Ellis, J., & Ellett, A. J. (2006). Improving retention among public child welfare workers: What can we learn from the experiences of committed survivors? Administration in Social Work, 30(4), 37–62. doi: 10.1300/J147v30n04_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar