References

• Adams, G., & Balfour, D. (1998). Unmasking administrative evil. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, J., & Smith, K. (2010). Managing restructured social services: Expanding the social? British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 530–547. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, D. (2010). Neoliberal restructuring, activism/participation, and social unionism in the nonprofit social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 10–28. doi: 10.1177/0899764008326681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2011). Ethics in an age of austerity: Social work and the evolving new public management. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503. doi: 10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouverne-De Bie, M., & Roose, R. (2009). Jeugdbescherming en Bijzondere Jeugdbijstand [Youth care and special youth care]. Ghent: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1046–1064. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J., & van den Broek, D. (2009). Accountable and countable: Information management systems and the bureaucratization of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7), 1326–1342. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlstedt, E., & Jacobsson, K. (2017). Indications of quality or quality as a matter of fact? ‘Open comparisons’ within the social work sector. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 119(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Carrilio, T. E. (2005). Management information systems. Administration in Social Work, 29(2), 43–61. doi: 10.1300/J147v29n02_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J. (2017). The logic of the database: In search of responsive social work. Ghent University. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2015). Street-level bureaucracy, management and the corrupted world of service. European Journal of Social Work, 19(5), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Hardy, M. (2017). The ethics of practical reasoning - exploring the terrain. European Journal of Social Work, Advance Access published January 30, 2017. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2016.1278524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, M. K., Rhodes, T., Mena, K. C., & Reid, R. (2009). Management information systems: Applications in home visiting programs designed to prevent child abuse and neglect. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 27(3), 194–215. doi: 10.1080/15228830903093098
   Google Scholar
• Flemish Government. (2014). Act of parliament concerning integrated youth care. Brussels: Flemish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015). Electronic information systems in human service organisations: The what, who, why and how of information. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1598–1613. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, A., & Shaw, I. (2011). Social work & ICT. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keymolen, E., & Broeders, D. (2013). Innocence lost: Care and control in Dutch digital youth care. British Journal of Social Work, 43(1), 41–63. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecluijze, I. (2015). The wrong tool for the job. The introduction of the Child Index in Dutch child welfare. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, D., & Chenoweth, L. (2008). Leave no stone unturned: The inclusive model of ethical decision making. Ethics and Social Welfare, 2(1), 38–49. doi: 10.1080/17496530801948739
   Google Scholar
• McBeath, B., & Webb, S. (2002). Virtue, ethics and social work: Being lucky, realistic, and not doing one’s duty. British Journal of Social Work, 32(8), 1015–1036. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/32.8.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortelmans, D. (2007). Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden [Manual qualitative research methods]. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2004). The impact of audit on social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34(8), 1075–1095. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2005). What tools do we need to improve identification of child abuse? Child Abuse Review, 14(6), 374–388. doi: 10.1002/car.921
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28(1), 5–27. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2008). The ‘change for children’ programme in England: Towards the ‘preventive-surveillance state’. Journal of Law and Society, 35(1), 166–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M. (2011). On administrative evil-doing within social work policy and services: Law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 177–194. doi: 10.1080/13691450903471229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, R., Roets, G., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2012). Irony and social work: In search of the happy Sisyphus. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1592–1607. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scourfield, J., & Welsh, I. (2003). Risk, reflexivity and social control in child protection: New times or same old story? Critical Social Policy, 23(3), 398–420. doi: 10.1177/02610183030233005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2014). Humanising managerialism: Reclaiming emotional reasoning, intuition, the relationship, and knowledge and skills in social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(3), 287–311. doi: 10.1080/02650533.2014.926868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, M. S., & Cheung, F. C. H. (2004). Gone with the wind: The impacts of managerialism on human services. British Journal of Social Work, 34(3), 437–442. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhee, J. P. (2014). Dat verandert de zaak [That changes things]. Brussel: Politeia.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. A. (2001). Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 31(1), 57–79. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/31.1.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Hall, C., & Peckover, S. (2009). The descriptive tyranny of the common assessment framework: Technologies of categorization and professional practice in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7), 1197–1217. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar