How do you solve a problem like Maria? Family complexity and institutional complications in UK social work

References

• Aronson, J. (1995). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, M. (2014). The fragmentation of social work and social care: Some ramifications and a critique. British Journal of Social Work, 45(8), 2406–2422. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Communities and Local Government. (2012). The Troubled Families Programme. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/11469/2117840.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., Morris, K., & White, S. (2014). A marriage made in hell: Early intervention meets child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1735–1749. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81. doi: 10.1177/0038038507072284
   Google Scholar
• Gov.scot. (2006). Good practice guidance for working with families and children affected by substance misuse. Retrieved from: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2003/02/16469/18712
   Google Scholar
• Gov.uk. (2016a). Helping pay for childcare. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/help-with-childcare-costs/free-childcare-and-education-for-2-to-4-year-olds
   Google Scholar
• Gov.uk. (2016b). Maternity pay and leave. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/maternity-pay-leave/overview
   Google Scholar
• Gov.wales. (2014). Substance misuse treatment frameworks. Retrieved from: http://gov.wales/topics/people-and-communities/communities/safety/substancemisuse/policy/treatmentframework/?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Juhila, K., Parton, N., & Pösö, T. (Eds.). (2003). Constructing client-hood in social work and human practices: Interaction, identities and practices. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Slembrouck, S. (2010). Categorizations of child “in need” and child “in need of protection” and its implications for the formulation of “deficit” parenting. In C. Candlin & J. Crichton (Eds.). Discourses of deficit (pp. 63–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Slembrouck, S., & Sarangi, S. (2006). Language practices in social work: Categorisation and accountability in child welfare. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. (2004). Family policy matters: Responding to family change in Europe. Bristol: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Bramley, G., Gannon, M., & Watkins, D. (2015). The cost of the cuts: The impact on local government and poorer communities. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hjörne, E., Juhila, K., & Van Nijnatten, C. (2010). Negotiating dilemmas in the practices of street-level welfare work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(3), 303–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00721.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2015). Working together to safeguard children. London: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, K., & Kelly, N. (2012). Rhetoric and reality surrounding care proceedings: Family justice under strain. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34(2), 155–166. doi: 10.1080/09649069.2012.718531
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). ‘The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants’. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laming, L. (2003). The Victoria climbie inquiry. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Laming, L. (2009). The protection of children in England: A progress report. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, W., Mirza, N., & Webb, C. (2018). Using the framework method to analyse mixed methods case studies. In: SAGE research methods cases part 2. Sage. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526438683.
   Google Scholar
• Matos, A. R., & Sousa, L. M. (2004). How multiproblem families try to find support in social services. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18(1), 65–80. doi: 10.1080/0265053042000180590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo, Å. (2014). Categorization. In C. Hall & K. Juhila, M. Matarese, & C. van Nijnatten (Eds.). Analysing social work communication: Discourse in practice (pp. 25–43). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitropolitski, S. (2015). Interactive interviews: A research note. Qualitative Social Research, 16(1).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., & Kreuger, R. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups (pp. 3–20). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, K. (2002). Family-based social work. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Critical practice in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, K., Hughes, N., Clarke, H., Tew, J., Mason, P., Galvant, S., … Loveless, L. (2008). Think family: A literature review of whole family approaches. London: Social Exclusion Task Force.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, K., White, S., Doherty, P., & Warwick, L. (2015). Out of time: Theorizing family in social work practice. Child and Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSPCC. (2017). Child protection in the UK. Retrieved from: http://www.nspcc.org.uk/preventing-abuse/child-protection-system/
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R., & Spencer, L. (2004). Personal communities: Not simply families of ‘fate’ or ‘choice’. International Sociological Association, 52(2), 199–221.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament.uk. (2015). Conception to age 2; the first 1001 days. Retrieved from: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CDP-2015-0133.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, G., & Bush, K. (Eds.). 2013. Handbook of marriage and the family. New York: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health England. (2017). Service users, families and carers. Retrieved from: http://www.nta.nhs.uk/who-service.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, J., & Regan, S. (2004). Meeting complex needs: The future of social care. London: The Institute for Public Policy Research and Turning Point. Retrieved from: http://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2011/05/Meeting_Complex_Needs_full_1301.pdf?noredirect=1.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, J. (2008). Systems thinking in the public sector: The failure of the reform regime … and a manifesto for a better way. Axminster: Triarchy Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (2007). Personal life: New directions in sociological thinking. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soydan, S. (1996). Using the vignette method in cross-cultural comparisons. In L. Hantrais & S. Mangen (Eds.), Cross-national research methods in the social sciences (pp. 120–129). London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. New York: Taylor and Frances.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., & Wastell, D. (2016). The rise and rise of prevention science in UK family welfare: Surveillance gets under the skin. Families, Relationships and Societies, 6(3), 427–445. doi: 10.1332/204674315X14479283041843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Wastell, D., Smith, S., Hall, C., Whitaker, E., Debelle, G., … Waring, J. (2015, February). Improving practice in safeguarding at the interface between hospital services and children’s social care: A mixed-methods case study. NIHR Journals Library; (Health).
   Google Scholar