1,787
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Children’s encounters with professionals – recognition and respect during collaboration

Barns møter med fagfolk – anerkjennelse og respekt under samarbeid

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aasland, D. G. (2014). Hva er det egentlig vi snakker om? Om samarbeidets objekt [What are we talking about? About the object of collaboartion]. In H. H. Grelland, S. B. Eide, A. Kristiansen, H. I. Sævareid, & D. G. Aasland (Eds.), Samarbeidets filosofi (pp. 19–37). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Archard, D., & Skivenes, M. (2009). Hearing the child. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 391–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00606.x
  • Bell, M. (2002). Promoting children’s rights through the use of relationship. Child & Family Social Work, 7(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00225.x
  • Bessell, C. (2015). Inclusive and respectful relationships as the basis for child inclusive policies and practies. The experiences of children in out-of home care in Australia. In T. Gal, & B. F. Duramy (Eds.), International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies (pp. 183–205). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bijleveld, G. G. v., Dedding, C. W. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G. (2014). Seeing eye to eye or not? Young people’s and child protection workers’ perspectives on children’s participation within the Dutch child protection and welfare services. Children and Youth Services Review, 47(Part 3(0)), 253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.09.018
  • Bijleveld, G. G. v., Dedding, C. W. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review’’. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138. doi:10.111/cts.12082 doi: 10.1111/cfs.12082
  • Bolin, A. (2015). Children’s agency in interprofessional collaboration. Nordic Social Work Research, 5(1), 50–66. doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2014.937829
  • Burr, R. M., Heather. (2003). Children and rights. In M. Woodhead & H. Montgomery (Eds.), Understanding childhood: An interdisciplinary approach (Vol. 1, pp. 136–169). Chichester: Wiley The Open University.
  • Cashmore, J. (2002). Promoting the participation of children and young people in care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(8), 837–847. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00353-8
  • Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2016). ‘You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you’: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 103–112. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12115
  • Damsgaard, H. L., & Eide, K. (2012). Utfordringer i velferdsstatens yrker [Challenges in the professions of the welfare state]. Fontene Forskning, 1(12), 69–81.
  • Dumbrill, G. C. (2006). Parental experience of child protection intervention: A qualitative study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(1), 27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.08.012
  • Fitzgerald, R., Graham, A., Smith, A., & Taylor, N. (2010). Children’s participation as a struggle over recognition. In B. Percy-Smith, & N. Thomas (Eds.), A handbook of children and young peoples’s participation. Perspectives from theory and practice (pp. 293–305). London: Routledge.
  • Graham, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Progressing children’s participation: Exploring the potential of a dialogical turn. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 17, 343–359. doi: 10.1177/0907568210369219
  • Green Paper. (2009). NOU 22:Det du gjør, gjør det helt : Bedre samordning av tjenester for utsatte barn og unge [What you do does it all: Better coordination of services for vulnerable children and adolescents]. Oslo: Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet.
  • Hansen, B. R. (2003). ‘Det er jo os, det handler om’ [‘It’s about us’]. Uden for. Dansk Socialrådgiverforening, 6, 19–29.
  • Hansen, H. A. (2009). Å ta barnets perspektiv –– en studie om hva sosialarbeidere gjør for å ivareta barnet i situasjonen [Taking the child’s perspective – A study of measures taken by social workers to help children]. Tidsskriftet Norges Barnevern, 86(04), 246–258.
  • Hesjedal, E., Iversen, A. C., Bye, H. H., & Hetland, H. (2016). The use of multidisciplinary teams to support child welfare clients. European Journal of Social Work, 19(6), 841–855. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1084268
  • Honneth, A. (2008). Kamp om anerkjennelse: om de sosiale konfliktenes moralske grammatikk [The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar on the social conflicts]. (L. Holm-Hansen, Trans.). Oslo: Pax.
  • Jensen, B. S. (2014). Inddragelse af udsatte børn og unge i socialt arbejde: reel inddragelse eller symbolsk retrorik? [Real involvement or symbolic rhetoric?]. Ph.D. Afhandling: Aalborg University Press.
  • Jobe, A., & Gorin, S. (2013). ‘If kids don’t feel safe they don’t do anything’: Young people’s views on seeking and receiving help from children’s social care services in England. Child & Family Social Work, 18(4), 429–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00862.x
  • Johansson, A. (2005). Narrativ teori och metod : med livsberättelsen i fokus [Narrative theory and methodology: Focus on the life story]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kelly, L. M., & Smith, K. A. (2017). Children as capable evaluators: Evolving conceptualizations of childhood in NGO practice settings. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 853–861. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12304
  • Kinge, E. (2006). Barnesamtaler: det anerkjennende samværet og samtalens betydning for barn med samspillsvansker [Conversations with children: Recognising time together and the importance of conversation for children who struggle with interaction]. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [The qualitative research interview]. (T. M. Anderssen & J. Rygge, Trans. 2. utg. ed.). Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
  • Kvello, Ø. (2010). Barn i risiko: skadelige omsorgssituasjoner [Children at risk: Harmful care situations]. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
  • Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 3–38. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar
  • Laming, L. (2003). The Victoria climbie inquiry: report of an inquiry. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-victoria-climbie-inquiry-report-of-an-inquiry-by-lord-laming
  • Larsen, E. (2011). Help or formality? Children’s experiences of participation in home-based child welfare cases: A Norwegian example. Nordic Social Work Research, 1(1), 43–60. doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2011.562033
  • Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why “listening to children” and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 405–420. doi: 10.1080/01596300701458970
  • Marthinsen, E., & Skjefstad, N. (2011). Recognition as a virtue in social work practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 195–212. doi: 10.1080/13691451003744317
  • McLeod, A. (2010). ‘A friend and an equal’: Do young people in care seek the impossible from their social workers? British Journal of Social Work, 40(3), 772–788. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn143
  • Morris, K. (2004). Partnership working: Changing understandings in child welfare services in England. In Advancing partnership-based practice with families. Protecting children. A professional publication of American humane (Vol. 19, pp. 61–68). Englewood, CO: American Humane.
  • Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report-a child-centred approach ( Report No. 0101806221). The Stationery Office.
  • Myrvold, T. M., Møller, G., Zeiner, H., Vardheim, I., Helgesen, M., & Kvinge, T. (2011). Den vanskelige samhandlingen: evaluering av forvaltningsreformen i barnevernet [Difficult interaction: Evaluation of the administrative reform in the child welfare system] (Vol. 2011:25). Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning.
  • O’Leary, P., Tsui, M.-S., & Ruch, G. (2013). The boundaries of the social work relationship revisited: Towards a connected, inclusive and dynamic conceptualisation. British Journal of Social Work, 43(1), 135–153. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr181
  • Paulsen, V. (2016). Ungdom på vei ut av barnevernet: - Brå overgang til voksenlivet [Youth transitioning out of the child welfare service: – An abrupt transition to adulthood]. Tidsskriftet Norges Barnevern, 92(01), 36–51. doi: 10.18261/issn.1891-1838-2016-01-04
  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Pölkki, P., Vornanen, R., Pursiainen, M., & Riikonen, M. (2012). Children’s participation in child-protection processes as experienced by foster children and social workers. Child Care in Practice, 18(2), 107–125. doi: 10.1080/13575279.2011.646954
  • Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Roose, R., Roets, G., Van Houte, S., Vandenhole, W., & Reynaert, D. (2013). From parental engagement to the engagement of social work services: Discussing reductionist and democratic forms of partnership with families. Child & Family Social Work, 18(4), 449–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00864.x
  • Ruch, G., Winter, K., Cree, V., Hallett, S., Morrison, F., & Hadfield, M. (2017). Making meaningful connections: Using insights from social pedagogy in statutory child and family social work practice. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 1015–1023. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12321
  • Sandbæk, M. (1999). Children with problems: Focusing on everyday life. Children & Society, 13(2), 106–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.1999.tb00112.x
  • Seim, S. (2007). Brukermedvirkning - et fremmedord for barn og ungdom i barnevernet [User involvement – A foreign word for children and youth in the child welfare service]. In S. Seim & T. Slettebø (Eds.), Brukermedvirkning i barnevernet [User involvement in the child welfare service] (pp. 68–88). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Skjervheim, H. (1996). Deltakar og tilskodar og andre essays [Participant and spectator and other essays] ([Ny utg.]. ed.). Oslo: Aschehoug.
  • Stensrud, M. (2007). Omsorg og overgrep : gransking av barnehjem, skolehjem og fosterhjem benyttet av Trondheim kommune fra 1930-årene til 1980-årene : rapport fra granskingsutvalget. [Caring and abuse: An investigation of orphanages, reformatories and foster homes used by Trondheim municipality from the 1930s to the 1980s: Report from the investigation board]. Trondheim: Fylkesmannen i Sør-Trøndelag.
  • The Norwegian Child Welfare Act. (1992). Act of 17 July 1992 No. 100 relating to child welfare services. Oslo: Grøndahl Dreyer.
  • Thomas, N., & O’Kane, C. (1999). Experiences of decision-making in middle childhood: The example of children “looked after” by local authorities. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 6(3), 369–387. doi: 10.1177/0907568299006003005
  • Ulvik, O. S. (2015). Talking with children: Professional conversations in a participation perspective. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 14(2), 193–208. doi: 10.1177/1473325014526923
  • UNCRC. (1989). The united nations convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved from http://353ld710iigr2n4po7k4kgvv-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_PRESS200910web.pdf
  • Vis, S. A., Holtan, A., & Thomas, N. (2012). Obstacles for child participation in care and protection cases-why Norwegian social workers find it difficult. Child Abuse Review, 21(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1002/car.1155
  • Warming, H. (2011). Børneperspektiver: børn som ligeværdige medspillere i socialt og pædagogisk arbejde [Children’s perspectives: Children as equal participants in social and pedagogical work]. København: Akademisk forlag.
  • Willumsen, E., & Skivenes, M. (2005). Collaboration between service users and professionals: Legitimate decisions in child protection – A Norwegian model. Child & Family Social Work, 10(3), 197–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00371.x
  • Winter, K. (2010). The perspectives of young children in care about their circumstances and implications for social work practice. Child & Family Social Work, 15(2), 186–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00658.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.