References

• Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation. Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings inst. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boel-Studt, S. M., & Tobia, L. (2016). A review of trends, research, and recommendations for strengthening the evidence-base and quality of residential group care. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 33(1), 13–35. doi: 10.1080/0886571X.2016.1175995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Thompson, K., … Davey, D. (2010). Performing ‘initial assessment’: Identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority childrens service. British Journal of Social Work, 20(2), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P. (2012). The evaluation society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ek, E. (2012). De granskade. Om hur offentliga verksamheter görs granskningsbara [ The auditees. On how public organisations are made auditable]. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Hämberg, E. (2012). Supervision as control system: The design of supervision as a regulatory instrument in the social services sector in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 17(3), 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hämberg, E., & Sedelius, T. (2016). Inspection of social services in Sweden: A comparative analysis of the use and adjustment of standards. Nordic Social Work Research, 6(2), 138–151. doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2016.1156015
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography. Principles in practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanberger, A., Nygren, L., & Andersson, K. (2018). Can state supervision improve eldercare? An analysis of the soundness of the Swedish supervision model. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(2), 371–389.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Human services as complex organisations. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, R., Grant, R., Jones, R., & Goldacre, A. (2016). A study of performance indicators and ofsted ratings in English child protection services. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
   Google Scholar
• IVO. (2015). Inspektionen för vård och omsorgs (IVO:s) policy för tillsyn [Supervision policy of the IVO]. Retrieved from http://www.ivo.se/globalassets/dokument/om-ivo/konferens/2015-jan-jun/tillsynspolicy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James. S. (2017). Implementing evidence-based practice in residential care – how far have we come? Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 34(2), 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. B., & McMillen, C. (2008). Measuring quality in residential treatment for children and youth. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 24(1–2), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/08865710802146622
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, G., Lundström, T., Sallnäs, M., & Wiklund, S. (2016). Big business in a thin market: Understanding the privatization of residential care for children and youth in sweden. Social Policy & Administration, 50(7), 805–823. doi: 10.1111/spol.12172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2004). The impact of audit on social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 1075–1095. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The munro review of child protection: Final report. A child-centered system. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nordstoga, S., & Stokken, A. (2011). Professional work in the squeeze: Experiences from a new control regime in residential care for children and youth in Norway. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 2, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pålsson, D. (2017). Conditioned agency? The role of children in the audit of residential care for children in Sweden. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Pålsson, D. (2016). Adjusting to standards: Reflections from ‘auditees’ at residential homes for children in Sweden. Nordic Social Work Research, 6(3), 222–233.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verifications? Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Sallnäs, M., & Vinnerljung, B. (2008). Into adulthood: A follow-up study of 718 young people who were placed in out-of-home care during their teens. Child & Family Social Work, 13, 144–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallnäs, M., Wiklund, S., & Lagerlöf, H. (2012). Welfare resources among children in care. European Journal of Social Work, 15 (4), 467–483. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2012.702313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W. (2014). Institutions and organisations. Ideas, interests and identities. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Socialtjänstförordning (SoF). (2001:937). [Social Services Regulation].
   Google Scholar
• Sköld, J. (2013). Historical abuse – A contemporary issue: Compiling inquiries into abuse and neglect of children in out-of-home care worldwide. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 14(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1080/14043858.2013.771907
   Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C. (2006). The regulation of out-of-home care. British Journal of Social Work, 37(2), 209–224. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, J. K., del Valle, J. F., Holmes, L., & Gilligan, R. (red.). (2015). Therapeutic residential care for children and youth: Developing evidence-based international practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund, S. (2011). Individ- och familjeomsorgens välfärdstjänster [Welfare services in personal social services]. In L. Hartman (Ed.), Konkurrensens konsekvenser [ The consequences of competition] (pp. 111–145). Stockholm: SNS.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research. Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar