References

• Amaro, M. I. (2015). Urgências e Emergências do Serviço Social: fundamentos da profissão na contemporaneidade. Lisboa: UCE.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, J., & Smith, K. (2010). Managing restructured social services: Expanding the social? British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 530–547. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2011). Ethics in an age of austerity: Social work and the evolving new public management. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. (2003). Raisons, bonnes raisons. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. (1975). L'Institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Certeau, M. D. (1984). The practice of every Day life. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowden, S., & Singh, G. (2007). The ‘user’: Friend, foe or fetish? A critical exploration of user involvement in health and social care. Critical Social Policy, 27, 5–23. doi: 10.1177/0261018307072205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeming, C. (2017). The lost and the new ‘liberal world’ of welfare capitalism. Social Policy & Society, 16(3), 405–422. doi: 10.1017/S1474746415000676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, L. (2011). The moral underground: How ordinary Americans subvert an unfair economy. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (2009). Repositioning social work. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates (pp. 13–25). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dustin, D. (2009). The McDonaldization of social work. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (2010). Constructing the 21st century developmental state: Potentialities and pitfalls. In O. Edigheji (Ed.), Constructing a democratic developmental state in South Africa potentials and challenges (pp. 37–58). Capetown: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2009). Managing to be professional? Team managers and practitioners in modernised social work. In J. Harris & V. White (Eds.), Modernising social work: Critical considerations (pp. 145–164). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2016). Professional discretion in welfare services. Beyond street-level bureaucracy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I. (2004). Neoliberalism, the third way and social work: The UK experience. Social Work and Society, 2, 479–493.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I. (2009). ‘Another social work is possible!’ reclaiming the radical tradition. In V. Leskošek (Ed.), Theories and methods of social work: Exploring different perspectives (pp. 81–98). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I., Lavalette, M., & Whitmore, E. (2004). Globalisation, global justice and social work. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I., & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2014). Social workers affecting social policy: An international perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2009). Marx and ‘modernization’: Reading capital as social critique and inspiration for social work resistance to neoliberalization. Journal of Social Work, 9, 199–221. doi: 10.1177/1468017308101822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2013). Social work and social theory. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. (2007). New public management and the ghost of max weber: Exorcized or still haunting? In T. Christensen, & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Transcending new public management. The transformation of public sector reforms (pp. 387–422). Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2010). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K. (2001). Reinventing critical social work: Challenges from practice, context and postmodernism. Critical Social Work, 2(1), Retrieved from http://www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/reinventing-critical-social-work-challenges-from-practice-context-and-postmodernism.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. (2013). Dimensions of discretion: Specifying the object of street-level bureaucracy research. Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 6(2), S425–S440.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2012). Narratives of crisis and crisis response: Perspectives from north and south. In P. Utting, S. Razavi, & R. Buchholz (Eds.), The global crisis and transformative social change (pp. 23–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan and UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (2004). The Neo-liberal assault: Voices from the front-line of British social work. In I. Ferguson, M. Lavalette, & E. Whitmore (Eds.), Globalisation, global justice and social work (pp. 95–106). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (2005). New labour: Choice and values. Critical Social Policy, 25, 427–446. doi: 10.1177/0261018305057023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, A. (2008). The impact of social transformation on the non-government welfare sector and the social work profession. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(2), 124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Marobela, M. (2008). New public management and the corporatisation of the public sector in peripheral capitalist countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(6), 423–434. doi: 10.1108/03068290810873401
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, C., Harris, J., & Wintersteen, D. (2003). Contingent on context: Social work and the state in Australia, Britain and the United States. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 191–208. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/33.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro Review of Child Protection Interim Report: The child’s journey. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/munro-reviewof-child-protection-interim-report-the-childs-journey
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28(1), 5–27. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F., & Silverman, B. (2012). The end of social work: Neoliberalizing social policy implementation. Critical Policy Studies, 6(2), 128–145. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2012.689734
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P. A. (2002). O modelo de welfare da Europa do Sul: Reflexões sobre a utilidade do conceito. Sociologia – Problemas e Práticas, 38, 25–59.
   Google Scholar
• Spolander, G., Engelbrecht, L., Martin, L., Strydom, M., Pervova, I., Marjanen, P., … Adaikalam, F. (2014). The implications of neoliberalism for social work: Reflections from a six-country international research collaboration. International Social Work, 57(4), 301–312. doi: 10.1177/0020872814524964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spolander, G., Engelbrecht, L., & Sansfaçon, A.P. (2015). Social work and macro-economic neoliberalism: Beyond the social justice rhetoric. European Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1066761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J., & Pease, B. (2011). Neoliberalism and Australian social work: Accommodation or resistance? Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 132–142. doi: 10.1177/1468017310387318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., White, S., Broadhurst, K., Peckover, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Children’s services in the iron cage of performance management: Street-level bureaucracy and the spectre of Švejkism. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 310–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S. (2006). Social work in a risk society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar