References

• Aldred, R. (2008). Ethical and political issues in contemporary research relationships. Sociology, 42(5), 887–903. doi: 10.1177/0038038508094568
   Google Scholar
• ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). European code of conduct for research integrity: Revised edition. Berlin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (1995). Ethics and values in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The British Association of Social Workers. (2012). BASW code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.basw.co.uk/codeofethics/
   Google Scholar
• Butler, I. (2002). A code of ethics for social work and social care research. The British Journal of Social Work, 32(2), 239–248. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/32.2.239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2007). Predatory vs. dialogic ethics: Constructing an illusion or ethical practice as the core of research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 315–335. doi: 10.1177/1077800406297648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaleff, I. (2009). The courageous follower (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Barret-Koelher.
   Google Scholar
• Childress, J., Faden, R., Gaare, R., Gostin, L., Kahn, J., Bonnie, R., … Nieburg, P. (2002). Public health ethics: Mapping the terrain. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(2), 170–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2002.tb00384.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Wray-Bliss, E. (2005). Discriminating ethics. Human Relations, 58(6), 779–824. doi: 10.1177/0018726705057175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, J., Bolen, S., & Mascha, E. (2016). Publication bias: The elephant in the review. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 123(4), 812–813. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. O., & Layder, D. (1994). Methods, sex and madness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, J. M. (2008). Ethics in mental health research: Principles, guidance, cases. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsberg, M., & Heise, L. (2002). Bearing witness: Ethics in domestic violence research. The Lancet, 359(9317), 1599–1604. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08521-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRC. (2005). Framework for research ethics. Retrieved from https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_326706_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faden, R. R., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ferdinand, J., Pearson, G., Rowe, M., & Worthington, F. (2007). A different kind of ethics. Ethnography, 8(4), 519–543. doi: 10.1177/1466138107083566
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (2003). Critical social work. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 123–130. doi: 10.1177/1473325003002002001
   Google Scholar
• Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. doi: 10.1126/science.1255484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, M., & Strom-Gottfried, K. J. (2011). No easy answers: Ethical challenges working with sex offenders. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39(1), 18–27. doi: 10.1007/s10615-010-0270-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M. T. (2008). Nursing experiences with the ethical dimensions of nursing education. Nursing Ethics, 15(3), 332–345. doi: 10.1177/0969733007088358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. doi: 10.1177/1077800403262360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. E. (2004). Pluralistic evaluation: A situational approach to service evaluation. Journal of Nursing Management, 12(1), 22–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00389.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hugman, R. (2010). Understanding international social work: A critical analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, B. (2008). Social work research for social justice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• International Association of Schools of Social Work. (2014). The IASSW statement on social work research. Retrieved from https://www.iassw-aiets.org/the-iassw-statement-on-social-work-research-july-2014/
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2012). Statement of ethical principles. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles/
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. Retrieved from https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/
   Google Scholar
• Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsen, A. (1998). The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (2004). Emancipatory social work? Opportunity or oxymoron. The British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 5–19. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, S. C. (2005). Mothers of children with acquired disabilities: Using the subjective voice to inform parent/professional partnership. Omega-Journal of Death and Dying, 51(1), 17–31. doi: 10.2190/6DGR-JRM1-1E84-1HE9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leviton, L. C. (2011). Ethics in program evaluation. In A. T. Panter & S. K. Sterba (Eds.), Handbook of ethics in quantitative methodology (pp. 241–264). New York, NY: Taylor Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Cannella, G. S. (2009). Ethics and the broader rethinking/reconceptualization of research as construct. Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies, 9(2), 273–285. doi: 10.1177/1532708608322793
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2007). Ethical issues in the involvement of young service users in research. Social Service Abstracts, 1(2), 176–193.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2011). Understanding social work research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mendis, K. (2009). Collecting data from mothers who have experienced childhood family violence with the use of a feminist methodology. Qualitative Social Work, 8(3), 377–390. doi: 10.1177/1473325009337846
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (2008). Deep in ethical waters: Transformative perspectives for qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 7(4), 484–503. doi: 10.1177/1473325008097142
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2018). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Orme, J. (2004). ‘It’s feminist because I say so!’ Feminist, social work and critical practice in the UK. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 131–154. doi: 10.1177/1473325003002002002
   Google Scholar
• Panter, A. T., & Sterba, S. K. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of ethics in quantitative methodology. New York, NY: Taylor Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Parada, H., & Wehbi, S. (2017). Reimagining anti-oppression social work research. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Peled, E., & Leichtentritt, R. (2002). The ethics of qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 1(2), 145–169. doi: 10.1177/147332500200100203
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (2001). Ethics education in social work. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. (1993). The philosophical foundations of social work. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. (2005). Social work values and ethics: Reflections on the profession’s odyssey. Advances in Social Work, 6(1), 24–32. doi: 10.18060/73
   Google Scholar
• Rommelspacher, B. (2003). Social work as a human rights profession. Socialno Delo, 42(4–5), 205–209.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Gould, N. (2001). Qualitative research in social work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Holland, S. (2014). Doing qualitative research in social work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, S. (2017). Decolonizing a graduate research course: Moving away from innocence and ignorance. In H. Parada & S. Wehbi (Eds.), Reimagining anti-oppression social work research (pp. 99–113). Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Sobočan, A. M. (2010). Ethics in/after social work research: Deliberation on the meaning of knowledge dissemination in social work research. In D. Zaviršek, B. Rommelspacher, & S. Staub (Eds.), Ethical dilemmas in social work: International perspective (pp. 169–187). Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Work, University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Stame, N. (2016). La valutazione pluralista. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderpool, H. (2002). Physician and philosopher: The philosophical foundation of medicine: Essays by Dr. Edmund Pellegrino. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347(12), 952–953. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200209193471224
   Google Scholar