Disabled citizens as researchers – Challenges and benefits of collaboration for effective action and change

References

• Aldridge, J. (2014). Working with vulnerable groups in social research: Dilemmas by default and design. Qualitative Research, 14(1), 112–130. doi: 10.1177/1468794112455041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, M., & Bowles, W. (2018). Research for social workers. An introduction to methods (4th ed.). London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (1971). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the Royal Planning Institute, 35(4), 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Google Scholar
• Aspis, S. (1997) Inclusion and exclusion. Paper presented at the social history of learning disability Conference ‘inclusion and exclusion’, the open university, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, 10 December.
   Google Scholar
• Aspis, S. (1999). What they don’t tell disabled people with learning difficulties. In S. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability Discourse (pp. 173–182). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (1998). The social model of disability: A sociological phenomenon ignored by sociologists. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 65–78). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes. Reflections on doing emancipatory disability research. Disability and Society, 18(1), 13–17. doi: 10.1080/713662197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, L. (2017). Research methods for social Workers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2000). Service users’ knowledge and social work theory: Conflict or collaboration? British Journal of Social Work, 30(4), 489–503. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/30.4.489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? Social Policy and Society, 1(2), 95–105. doi: 10.1017/S1474746402000222
   Google Scholar
• Bortolletto, N. (2017). Participatory action research in local development: An opportunity for social work. European Journal of Social Work, 20(4), 484–496. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2016.1188770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boser, S. (2006). Ethics and power in community-campus partnerships for research. Action Research, 4(1), 9–21. doi: 10.1177/1476750306060538
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, E. S. (2004). No more throw away people. The co-production imperative. Washington, DC: Essential Books.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. D. (1999). The autodriven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children’s experience. Visual Sociology, 14(1/2), 39–50. doi: 10.1080/14725869908583801
   Google Scholar
• Corbin Dwyer, S., & Buckle, J. (2009). The space In-between: On being and insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(1), 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, B. (1976). Action research: Towards a procedural model. Human Relations, 29(3), 215–238. doi: 10.1177/001872677602900302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2009). Researching sensitive topics: Qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research, 9(1), 61–79. doi: 10.1177/1468794108098031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzur, A. W. (2008). Democratic professionalism. Citizen participation and the reconstruction of professional ethics, identity and practice. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2017). Being disabled in Britain. A journey less equal. London: Equality and Human Rights Commission. Retrieved from: https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/being-disabled-in-britain.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, V. (2012). The pleasure principle: Employing arts-based methods in social work research. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 532–545. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2012.702311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2017). Disability studies. An interdisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. doi: 10.1080/14725860220137345
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialisation of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, B. (1994). Empowerment and social research: Elements for an analytical framework. In B. Humphries & C. Truman (Eds.), Rethinking social research. Anti-discriminatory approaches in research methodology (pp. 185–204). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, H., Hart, A., & Heaver, B. (2016). Building resilience through group visual arts activities: Findings from a scoping study with young people who experience mental health complexities and/or learning difficulties. Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 541–560. doi: 10.1177/1468017315581772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, M., Hanson, E., Grant, G., & Keady, J. (2007). User participation in health and social care research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 101–114. doi: 10.1080/02674649266780141
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2009). Understanding disability: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. K. (2017). Qualitative methods in social work research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, G., & Payne, J. (2004). Key concepts in social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2013). New public governance, the third sector and co-production. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Probst, B. (2015). The eye regards itself: Benefits and challenges of reflexivity in qualitative social work research. Social Work Research, 39(1), 37–48. doi: 10.1093/swr/svu028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P. (1994). Participation in human inquiry. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage Book of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1979). On becoming a social scientist. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, S. (2010). Social work. The rise and fall of a profession? Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, S. (2013 April 4) What is the way forward for social work? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2013/apr/03/way-forward-for-social-work.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, C. (2018). Philosophy, politics and values. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (4th ed., pp. 22–23). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2015). Disability research today. International perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. (2012). De-colonising methodologies: Research and indigenous people. London: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, P. (2000). Collaborative approaches to research. In B. Humphries (Ed.), Research in social care and social welfare. Issues and debates for practice (pp. 16–30). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, R., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2001). A handbook for action research in health and social care. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar