334
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The list. On discretion and refusal in the Italian asylum system

La lista. Discrezionalità e rifiuto nel sistema italiano di asilo

References

  • Affolter, L., Miaz, J., & Poertner, E. (2019). Taking the “just” decision: Caseworkers and their communities of interpretation in the Swiss asylum office. In N. Gill, & A. Good (Eds.), Asylum determination in Europe. Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 263–284). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Aretxaga, B. (2003). Maddening states. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 393–410.
  • Barberis, E., & Boccagni, P. (2014). Blurred rights, local practices: Social work and immigration in Italy. The British Journal of Social Work, 44(1), 70–87.
  • Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bohmer, C., & Shuman, A. (2008). Rejecting refugees: Political asylum in the 21st century. New York: Routledge.
  • Cabot, H. (2013). The social aesthetics of eligibility: NGO aid and indeterminacy in the Greek asylum process. American Ethnologist, 40(3), 452–466.
  • Cabot, H. (2018). The European refugee crisis and humanitarian citizenship in Greece. Ethnos, 6, 1–25.
  • Campesi, G. (2011). The Arab spring and the crisis of the European border regime: Manufacturing emergency in the Lampedusa crisis (EUI Working Paper). Fiesole.
  • Cavalli, A. (2001). Reflections on political culture and the ‘Italian national character’. Daedalus, 130(3), 119–137.
  • Coutin, S. B. (2007). Nations of emigrants: Shifting boundaries of citizenship in El Salvador and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • D’Angelo, A. (2018). Italy: The ‘illegality factory’? Theory and practice of refugees’ reception in Sicily. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(12), 2213–2226.
  • Darling, J. (2016). Privatising asylum: Neoliberalisation, depoliticisation and the governance of forced migration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3), 230–243.
  • DeGenova, N. P. (2002). Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 419–447.
  • Dines, N., Montagna, N., & Vacchelli, E. (2018). Beyond crisis talk: Interrogating migration and crises in Europe. Sociology, 52(3), 439–447.
  • Facchini, C., & Lorenz, W. (2013). Between differences and common features: The work of social workers in Italy. International Social Work, 56(4), 439–454.
  • Fassin, D. (2007). Humanitarianism as a politics of life. Public Culture, 19(2), 499–520.
  • Fassin, D. (2013). The precarious truth of asylum. Public Culture, 25(69), 39–63.
  • Fassin, D., & D’Halluin, E. (2005). The truth from the body: Medical certificates as ultimate evidence for asylum seekers. American Anthropologist, 107(4), 597–608.
  • Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: “Development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Garelli, G., & Tazzioli, M. (2013). Arab springs making space: Territoriality and moral geographies for asylum seekers in Italy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(6), 1004–1021.
  • Gill, N. (2009). Presentational state power: Temporal and spatial influences over asylum sector decision makers. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(2), 215–233.
  • Ginsborg, P. (1990). A history of contemporary Italy: Society and politics, 1943–1988. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Gupta, A. (1995). Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist, 22(2), 375–402.
  • Heyman, J. (1995). Putting power in the anthropology of bureaucracy. The immigration and naturalization service at the Mexico-United States border. Current Anthropology, 36(2), 261–287.
  • Heyman, J., & Smart, A. (1999). States and illegal practices: An overview. In J. Heyman (Ed.), States and illegal practices (pp. 1–24). New York: Berg.
  • Hynes, T. (2003). The issue of “trust” or “mistrust” in research with refugees: Choices, caveats and considerations for researchers. Geneva: UNHCR Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit.
  • IDOS. (2019). Dossier Statistico Immigrazione. Roma: Edizioni IDOS.
  • James, D., & Killick, E. (2010). Ethical dilemmas? UK immigration, legal aid funding reform and caseworkers. Anthropology Today, 26(1), 13–16.
  • Kjaerulff, J. (2018). Discretion and the values of fractal man. An anthropologist’s perspective on ‘street-level bureaucracy’. European Journal of Social Work, 22(5), 1–11.
  • Korać, M. (2003). The lack of integration policy and experiences of settlement: A case study of refugees in Rome. Journal of Refugee Studies, 16(4), 398–421.
  • Koselleck, R. (1959/1988). Critique and crisis. Enlightenment and the pathogenesis of modern society. Cambridge, MA: Berg Publishers.
  • Lapavitsas, C., & KouvéLakis, E. (2012). Crisis in the Eurozone. London: Verso.
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individuals in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Maynard-Moody, S., & Leland, S. (2000). Stories from the front lines of public management: Street-level workers as responsible actors. In L. Brudney, & J. O’Toole (Eds.), Advancing public management: New developments in theory, methods, and practice (pp. 109–123). Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
  • Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358.
  • McGranahan, C. (2016). Theorizing refusal: An introduction. Cultural Anthropology, 31(3), 319–325.
  • Miaz, J. (2017). From the law to the decision: The social and legal conditions of asylum adjudication in Switzerland. European Policy Analysis, 3(2), 372–396.
  • Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 77–96.
  • Mountz, A. (2003). Human smuggling, the transnational imaginary, and everyday geographies of the nation-state. Antipode, 35(3), 622–644.
  • Mountz, A., & Hiemstra, N. (2014). Chaos and crisis: Dissecting the spatio-temporal logics of contemporary migrations and state practices. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(2), 382–390.
  • Narotzky, S., & Besnier, N. (2014). Crisis, value, and hope: Rethinking the economy. Current Anthropology, 55(S9), S4–S16.
  • Novak, P. (2019). The neoliberal location of asylum. Political Geography, 70, 1–13.
  • Nyers, P. (2013). Rethinking refugees: Beyond state of emergency. London: Routledge.
  • Pardo, I. (2000). When power lacks legitimacy: Relations of politics and law to society in Italy. In I. Pardo (Ed.), Morals of legitimacy: Between agency and system (pp. 83–106). New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Pinelli, B. (2018). Control and abandonment: The power of surveillance on refugees in Italy, during and after the Mare Nostrum operation. Antipode, 50(3), 725–747.
  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rakopoulos, T. (2014). The crisis seen from below, within, and against: From solidarity economy to food distribution cooperatives in Greece. Dialectical Anthropology, 38, 189–207.
  • Roitman, J. L. (2013). Anti-crisis. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sandvik, K. B. (2011). Blurring boundaries: Refugee resettlement in Kampala – between the formal, the informal, and the illegal. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 34(1), 11–32.
  • Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2006). Rethinking theories of the state in an age of globalisation. In A. Sharma, & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader (pp. 1–42). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Sorgoni, B. (2015). Anthropology and asylum procedures and policies in Italy. In E. Tauber, & D. Zinn (Eds.), The public value of anthropology: Engaging critical social issues through ethnography (pp. 31–60). Bozen-Bolzano: Bozen-Bolzano University Press.
  • SPRAR. (2012). Rapporto annuale del sistema di protezione per richiedenti asilo e rifugiati. Anno 2011–2012. Roma.
  • Ticktin, M. (2006). Where ethics and politics meet: The violence of humanitarianism in France. American Ethnologist, 33(1), 33–49.
  • Tuckett, A. (2018). Rules, paper, status: Migrants and precarious bureaucracy in contemporary Italy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Van Aken, M. (2008). Rifugio Milano. Vie di fuga e vita quotidiana dei richiedenti asilo. Milano: Carta Edizioni.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.