References

• Agnew, A., Manktelow, R., Haynes, T., & Jones, L. (2011). Bereavement assessment practice in Hospice settings: Challenges for palliative care social workers. British Journal of Social Work, 41(1), 111–130. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anheier, H., Hass, R., & Beller, A. (2013). Accountability and transparency in the German nonprofit sector: A paradox? International Review of Public Administration, 18(3), 69–84. doi: 10.1080/12294659.2013.10805264
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, R., Hall, B., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). Cochrane update ‘scoping the scope’ of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147–150. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avby, G., Nilsen, P., & Dahlgren, M. (2014). Ways of understanding evidence-based practice in social work: A qualitative study. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1366–1383. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2013). Negotiating personal engagement and professional accountability: Professional wisdom and ethics work. European Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 587–604. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2012.732931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in 'the risk society'. British Journal of Social Work, 40(40), 1279–1296. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq018
   Google Scholar
• Benish, A. (2010). Re-bureaucratizing welfare administration. Social Service Review, 84(1), 77–101. doi: 10.1086/652679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark, A., & Lundström, T. (2011). Guided or independent? Social workers, central bureaucracy and evidence-based practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14(3), 323–337. doi: 10.1080/13691451003744325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, B., Greatbanks, R., Munro, J., & Gaffney, M. (2017). Service delivery under translation: Multi-stakeholder accountability in the non-profit community sector in New Zealand. Health and Social Care in the Community, 25(2), 402–413. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. (2014). Public accountability. In M. Bovens, R. Goodin, & T. Schillemans, T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braye, S., & Preston-Shoot, M. (1999). Accountability, administrative law and social work practice: Redressing or reinforcing the power imbalance? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 21(3), 235–256. doi: 10.1080/09649069908410571
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. (2008). Accountability in street-level organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 317–336. doi: 10.1080/01900690701590587
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J., & van den Broek, D. (2009). Accountable and countable: Information management systems and the bureaucratization of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7), 1326–1342. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrilio, T. (2008). Accountability, evidence, and the use of information systems in social service programs. Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 135–148. doi: 10.1177/1468017307088495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, A., Bulkeley, K., Veitch, C., Bundy, A., Lincoln, M., Brentnall, J., … Griffiths, S. (2013). Carer and service providers’ experiences of individual funding models for children with a disability in rural and remote areas. Health and Social Care in the Community, 21(4), 432–441. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, J., Declercq, A., & Hermans, K. (2016). Street-level strategies of child welfare social workers in Flanders: The use of electronic client records in practice. British Journal of Social Work, 46(5), 1249–1265. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (2014). Accountability as a cultural keyword. In M. Bovens, R. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 23–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. (2016). The social care Institute for excellence and evidence-based policy and practice: Table 1. British Journal of Social Work, 46(2), 498–513. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism. The third logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuertes, V., Jantz, B., Klenk, T., & Mcquaid, R. (2014). Between cooperation and competition: The organisation of employment service delivery in the UK and Germany. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23(S1), S71–S86. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12100
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2013). The development of electronic information systems for the future: Practitioners, ‘embodied structures’ and ‘technologies-in-practice’. British Journal of Social Work, 43(3), 430–445. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, L., & Foldy, E. (2015). The space before action: The role of peer discussion groups in frontline service provision. Social Service Review, 89(1), 166–202. doi: 10.1086/680319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulikers, H. (2016). Socially justifiable. Meaningful, educational and democratic accountability of social work [Sociaal verantwoord. Betekenisvolle, leerzame en democratische verantwoording van sociaal werk]. Utrecht: University of Humanistic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (1992). Human services as complex organizations. Thousend Oaks: Sage Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFSW. (2012). Statement of ethical principles. Berne: Switzerland. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles/
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, S. (2012). Who runs the mill? The distribution of power in Swedish social service agencies. European Journal of Social Work, 15(5), 679–695. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2011.594424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2014). The story of Baby P: Setting the record straight. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavadias, D., Dehertogh, B., Rihter, L., Schubert, H., & Spieckermann, H. (2011). Evaluation as learning: The collaboration between social work and research in cross-agency evaluation in Germany and Slovenia. European Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 89–107. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2010.520411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, S., Jennings, B., Laurier, E., Cree, V., & White, B. (2016). Towards an interactional approach to reflective practice in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3), 484–499. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1126558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legood, A., McGrath, M., Searle, R., & Lee, A. (2016). Exploring how social workers experience and cope with public perception of their profession. British Journal of Social Work, 46(7), 1872–1889. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 96(5), 1–9. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   Google Scholar
• Levin, L. (2015). Involvement as inclusion? Shared decision-making in social work practice in Israel: A qualitative account. Health and Social Care in the Community, 23(2), 208–215. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manthorpe, J., & Livsey, L. (2009). European challenges in delivering social services in rural regions: A scoping review. European Journal of Social Work, 12(1), 5–24. doi: 10.1080/13691450802567440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manthorpe, J., Martineau, S., Ridley, J., Cornes, M., Rosengard, A., & Hunter, S. (2015). Embarking on self-directed support in Scotland: A focused scoping review of the literature. European Journal of Social Work, 18(1), 36–50. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2014.885883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matarese, M., & Caswell, D. (2018). I'm gonna ask you about yourself, so I can put it on paper’: Analysing street-level bureaucracy through form-related talk in social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(3), 714–733. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, C. (2014). Using critical reflection to research possibilities for change. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1419–1435. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(143), 2–7. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munro, E. (2004). The impact of audit on social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34(8), 1075–1095. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobel, C., & Irwin, J. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social, economic, and political environment. Journal of Social Work, 9(3), 345–358. doi: 10.1177/1468017309334848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M., & Steijn, B. (2013). Professionals under pressure. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2014). Watchdog journalism. In M. Bovens, R. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of public accountability (pp. 525–545). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pithouse, A., Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Wastell, D., & White, S. (2012). Trust, risk and the (mis)management of contingency and discretion through new information technologies in children’s services. Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 158–178. doi: 10.1177/1468017310382151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollit, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M. (2010). On the evidence for viruses in social work systems: Law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 13(4), 465–482. doi: 10.1080/13691450903471211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saario, S., & Raitakari, S. (2010). Contractual audit and mental health rehabilitation: A study of formulating effectiveness in a finish supported housing unit. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(3), 321–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00726.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, S., Alaggia, R., Watson, K., & Morton, T. (2008). Implementing an evidence-based parenting program with adherence in the real world of community practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(6), 543–554. doi: 10.1177/1049731507308999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., Stevenson, M., & McDowell, M. (2018). Communicating risk in dementia care: Survey of health and social care professionals. Health and Social Care in the Community, 26(2), e291–e303. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkens, E., Hoijtink, M., & Guliker, M. (2013). Democratizing social work: From New public management to democratic professionalism. In M. Noordegraaf, & B. Steijn (Eds.), Professionals under pressure: The reconfiguration of professional work in changing public services (pp. 161–178). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R., & Knies, E. (2016). Performance management, caseloads and the frontline provision of social services. Social Policy and Administration, 50(1), 59–78. doi: 10.1111/spol.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M. C., Cheung, J. C.-S., Tsui, M.-s., & Chu, C. K. (2017). Examining the neoliberal discourse of accountability: The case of Hong Kong's social service sector. International Social Work, 60(4), 976–989. doi: 10.1177/0020872815594229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. (2014). Accountability and democracy. In M. Bovens, R. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 39–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinbach, R. (1977). Accountability crises: Consequences of professionalization. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 7(4), 1011–1024.
   Google Scholar
• Welbourne, P., & Dixon, J. (2008). Accountable corporate parenting: Local authority practice in England and Wales and some reflections on community participation in the US. Journal of Social Work, 8(3), 291–309. doi: 10.1177/1468017308091041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Hall, C., & Peckover, S. (2009). The descriptive tyranny of the common assessment framework: Technologies of categorization and professional practice. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7), 1197–1217. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar