References

• Aaslund, H. (2019). Fra «Brukermedvirkning» til «Demokrati» –språkets betydning i deltakende aksjonsforskning [From “User Involvement” to “Democracy” – the meaning of language in participatory action research]. In O. P. Askheim, I. M. Lid, & S. Østensjø (Eds.), Samproduksjon i forskning. Forskning med nye aktører [Co-production in Research. Research with New Agents]. (pp. 111–129). https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215031675-2019
   Google Scholar
• Aaslund, H., & Seim, S. (2020). ‘The long and winding road’ — collective action among people experiencing homelessness. International Journal of Action Research, 16(2), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v16i2.02
   Google Scholar
• Albisa, C., & Sekaran, S. (2006). Realizing domestic social justice through international human rights. NYU Rev. L. & Soc. Change, 30, 351–352.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A. (2004). Brukermedvirkning, politikk og velferdsstat [User Involvement, Policy, and Welfare State]. (Dr. polit. thesis). University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A. (2006). Truet frivillighet og forvitrede folkebevegelser? En diskusjon av hva perspektiver fra studier av sosiale bevegelser kan tilføre forskningen om frivillige organisasjoner [Threatened volunteerism and weathered popular movements? A discussion of what perspectives from social movement studies can add to research about voluntary organisations]. Sosiologisk tidsskrift [Journal of Sociology], 14(2), 146–170. http://www.idunn.no/st/2006/02/truet_frivillighet_og_forvitrede_folkebevegelser_en_diskusjon_av_hva_perspe.
   Google Scholar
• Androff, D. (2015). Practicing rights: Human rights-based approaches to social work practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anker, J. (2009). Speaking for the homeless–opportunities, strengths and dilemmas of a user organisation. European Journal of Homelessness, 3, 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2013). Negotiating personal engagement and professional accountability: Professional wisdom and ethics work. European Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.732931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, S., Schoeneman, A., & Sawyer, J. (2014). Critiquing and analyzing the effects of neoliberalism on community organizing: Implications and recommendations for practitioners and educators. Journal of Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 6(1), 36–60. https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.6.1.36-60
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. J. (1995). Social theory and the politics of identity. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Critical social theory: Culture, history, and the challenge of difference (pp. 9–36). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, M., & Foster, V. (2011). Introducing ‘deviant’ social work: Contextualising the limits of radical social work whilst understanding (fragmented) resistance within the social work labour process. British Journal of Social Work, 41(3), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpiano, R. M., & Daley, D. M. (2006). A guide and glossary on post-positivist theory building for population health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(7), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.031534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S. (2007). Participation, power, conflict and change: Theorizing dynamics of service user participation in the social care system of England and Wales. Critical Social Policy, 27(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018306075717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. R. (2016). Global health, human rights, and the challenge of Neoliberal policies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, N. F., & Markkola, P. (2006). Introduction. In N. F. Christiansen, K. Petersen, N. Edling, & P. Haave (Eds.), The Nordic model of welfare: A historical reappraisal (pp. 9–30). Museum Tusculanum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Weber, M. (2020). Labor markets during the covid-19 crisis: A preliminary view (0898-2937).
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. (2007). Some critical perspectives on social work and collectives. The British Journal of Social Work, 39(2), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, D. M., & Snow, D. A. (2000). The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1063–1104. https://doi.org/10.1086/210399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (1992). Analysing social movement networks. In M. Diani & R. Everman (Eds.), Studying collective action (Vol. 105, pp. 107-135). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (2013). Organizational fields and social movement dynamics. In J. van Stekelenburg, C. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Dynamics, mechanisms, and processes. The future of social movement research (pp. 145–168). Univeristy og Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M., & Eyerman, R. (1992). Studying collective action (Vol. 30). SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (2010). Social work in a globalizing world. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, O. (2020). Covid-19: Trump stokes protests against social distancing measures. BMJ, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelstad, E. (2020). Norway’s workers insisted they shouldn’t pay for coronavirus — and they won. Jacobin. https://jacobinmag.com/2020/03/coronavirus-norway-workers-sick-pay-social-democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E. (2018a). Four features of cooptation. Nordisk Välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research, 3(01), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-02 ER
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E. (2018b). Incorporation and individualization of collective voices: Public service user involvement and the user movement’s mobilization for change. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 832–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9971-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild, A., Gostin, L., & Bayer, R. (2020). Vexing, veiled, and inequitable: Social distancing and the “rights” divide in the age of COVID-19. The American Journal of Bioethics, 20(7), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1764142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I. (2017). Hope over fear: Social work education towards 2025. European Journal of Social Work, 20(3), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1189402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, J. (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct? A queer dilemma. Social Problems, 42(3), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz, M. (2011). Public narrative, collective action, and power. In S. Odugbemi, & T. Lee (Eds.), Accountability through public opinion: From inertia to public action (pp. 273–289). The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Gentilini, U., Almenfi, M., Orton, I., & Dale, P. (2020). Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVID-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33635.
   Google Scholar
• Hardina, D., Jendian, M. A., & White, C. G. (2015). Tactical decision-making: Community organizers describe ethical considerations in social action campaigns.(Report). Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 42(1), 73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, R. (2016, June 28). Disabled activists condemn treatment at social work conference The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2016/jun/28/disabled-activists-condemn-treatment-social-work-conference.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, L. M., & Link, R. J. (2012). Handbook of international social work: Human rights, development, and the global profession. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herz, M., & Lalander, P. (2018). Neoliberal management of social work in Sweden. In M. Kamali, & J. H. Jönsson (Eds.), Neoliberalism, Nordic welfare states and social work: Current and future challenges (pp. 57–66). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. S. (2009). The mandate for community work in the Nordic welfare states. In G. S. Hutchinson (Ed.), Community work in the Nordic countries. Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ife, J. (2012). Human rights and social work: Towards rights-based practice (pp. 15–37). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, A., Smart, A., Richards, R., Harrison, S., Carrillo, M., & Valentine, D. (2014). Human rights and social work codes of ethics: An international analysis. Journal of Social Welfare and Human Rights, 2(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15640/jswhr.v2n2a1
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (2013a). Demand and supply of protest. In D. A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 326–327). Wiley-Blacwell.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. (2013b). The Dynamics of demand. In B. Klandermans, J. van Stekelenburg, & C. Roggeband (Eds.), The future of social movement research (pp. 3–16). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & Staggenborg, S. (2002). Methods of social movement research. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kojan, B. H., Marthinsen, E., Moe, A., & Skjefstad, N. S. (2018). Neoliberal reframing of user representation in Norway. In M. Kamali, & J. H. Jönsson (Eds.), Neoliberalism, Nordic welfare States and social work (pp. 109–118). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kus, B. (2006). Neoliberalism, institutional change and the welfare state: The case of Britain and France. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 47(6), 488–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715206070268
   Google Scholar
• Lakeman, R., & McGowan, P. (2007). Service users, authority, power and protest: A call for renewed activism. Mental Health Practice (Through 2013), 11(4), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.7748/mhp2007.12.11.4.12.c6332
   Google Scholar
• Ledwith, M. (2011). Community development: A critical approach. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (1998). Citizenship on the margins: Citizenship, social work and social action. European Journal of Social Work, 1(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691459808414719
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (2001). ‘An offer you can’t refuse’: Workfare in international perspective. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, A., Gruber, S., & Righard, E. (2018). Brandväggar och det sociala arbetets professionsetik [Fire walls and social work professional ethics]. In M. Dahlseth, & P. Lalander (Eds.), Manifest: för ett socialt arbete i tiden [Manifest for a Timely Social Work] (pp. 291–302). Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 1–20). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. In H. Johnston, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and Culture (pp. 41–63). UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, P. (2002). Social workers and the ethical dilemmas of community action campaigns: Lessons from the Australian State of Victoria. Community Development Journal, 37(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/37.2.157
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2017). NASW Code of Ethics. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, L.-E. (1999). Från idé till handling: en sociologisk studie av frivilliga organisationers uppkomst och fallstudier av Noahs Ark, 5i12-rörelsen, Farsor och morsor på stan [From Idea to Action: A Sociological Study of Voluntary Organizations’ Origin and Case Studies of Noahs Ark, the 5in12-movement, Dads and Mums Downtown]. Almqvist & Wiksell International.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. (1979). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Pyles, L. (2013). Progressive community organizing: Reflective practice in a globalizing world. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, M. (2016). Social work and social justice: Concepts, challenges, and strategies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Houser, L., & Fording, R. C. (2010). The third level of US welfare reform: Governmentality under neoliberal paternalism. Citizenship Studies, 14(6), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2010.522363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & K. Hanspeter (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (Vol. 1, pp. 380-412). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A. (2013). Identity dilemmas, discursive fields, identity work, and mobilization. Clarifying the identity–movement Nexus. In J. van Stekelenburg, C. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The Future of social movement research (pp. 263–280). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Cress, D. M. (2005). Identifying the precipitants of homeless protest across 17 US cities, 1980 to 1990. Social Forces, 83(3), 1183–1210. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spolander, G., Engelbrecht, L., Martin, L., Strydom, M., Pervova, I., Marjanen, P., Tani, P., Sicora, A., & Adaikalam, F. (2014). The implications of neoliberalism for social work: Reflections from a six-country international research collaboration. International Social Work, 57(4), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814524964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, L. (2004). Roots to power: A manual for grassroots organizing. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Stjernø, S. (2013). Profesjon og solidaritet [Profession and solidarity]. In A. Molander & J. C. Smedby (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier [Studies of Professions] (Vol. 2, pp. 130–143). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Strier, R., & Bershtling, O. (2016). Professional resistance in social work: Counterpractice assemblages. Social Work, 61(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/sww010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom-Gottfried, K. (2014). Straight talk about professional ethics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swerts, T. (2017). Creating space for citizenship: The liminal politics of undocumented activism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, V. (2013). Social movement participation in the global society. Identity, networks, and emotions. In J. van Stekelenburg, C. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The Future of social movement research (pp. 37–58). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, V., & Van Dyke, N. (2007). ‘Get up, stand up’: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 262–293). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. E. (1992). Collective identity in social movement communities: Lesbian Feminist mobilization. In J. Freeman, & V. Johnson (Eds.), Waves of protest: Social movements since the sixties (pp. 169–194). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• van Stekelenburg, J., & Roggeband, C. (2013). Introduction. In J. van Stekelenburg, C. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The future of social movement research (pp. xi–xxii). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J., & Pease, B. (2011). Neoliberalism and Australian social work: Accommodation or resistance? Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017310387318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshawsky, D. N. (2010). New power relations served here: The growth of food banking in Chicago. Geoforum, 41(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, M., & Banks, S. (2019). Practising ethically in unethical times: Everyday resistance in social work. Ethics and Social Welfare, 13(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2019.1597141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, C. (1987). Social justice and human rights. Persona & Derecho, 17, 199.
   Google Scholar