References
- Andersen, N. A., Caswell, D., & Larsen, F. (2017). A new approach to helping the hard-to-place unemployed: The promise of developing new knowledge in an interactive and collaborative process. European Journal of Social Security, 19(4), 335–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1388262717745193
- Bonoli, G. (2012). Active labour market policy and social investment: A changing relationship. In N. Morel & B. Palier (Eds.), Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges (pp. 181–204). Policy Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847429247.001.0001
- Bredgaard, T. (2015). Evaluating what works for whom in active labour market policies. European Journal of Social Security, 17(4), 436–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271501700403
- Brodkin, L. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), i253–i277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq093
- Brown, A. J. G. (2015). Can hiring Subsidies benefit the unemployed? IZA World of Labor, 163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.163
- Brown, A. J. G., & Koettl, J. (2015). Active labour market programmes: Employment gain or fiscal drain? The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40172-015-0025-5
- Calmfors, L., Forslund, A., & Hemström, N. (2002). Does active labour market policy work? Lessons from the Swedish experiences. Working paper 4. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 675; IFAU Working Paper No. 2002:4. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=305360
- Caswell, D., Larsen, F., van Berkel, R., & Kupka, P. (2017). Conclusions and topics for future research. In R. Van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka, & F. Larsen (Eds.), Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work policies in Europe. Activating the unemployed (pp. 181–200). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40172-015-0025-5
- Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2010). Front-line work in employment services after ten years of new public management reform: Governance and activation in Australia, the Netherlands and the UK. European Journal of Social Security, 12(4), 357–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271001200407
- CZSO. (2019). Czech Statistical Office. Macro-economic indicators. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/hmu_cr
- Hora, O., Horáková, M., Suchanec, M., Rákoczyová, M., & Sirovátka, T. (2020). Vyhodnocení rekvalifikačních programů realizovaných v České republice v roce 2016. VÚPSV.
- Jantz, B., Christensen, T., & Lagreid, P. (2015). Performance management and Accountability: The welfare administration reform in Norway and Germany. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(13), 947–959. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1069838
- Kotíková, J. (2017). Závěrečná zpráva projektu MIKOP. VÚPSV. Unpublished.
- Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Lødemel, I., & Moreira, A. (Eds.). (2014). Activation or Workfare? Governance and the neo-Liberal Convergence. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773589.001.0001
- MLSA (Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs). (2019a). Monthly statistics on unemployment. https://www.mpsv.cz/web/cz/mesicni
- MLSA (Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs). (2019b). Statistical yearbooks of labor market. https://www.mpsv.cz/statisticka-rocenka
- Nicaise, I., Bollens, J., Dawes, L., Laghaei, S., Thaulow, I., Verdié, M., & Wagner, A. (1995). Labour market programmes for the poor in Europe. Pitfalls, dilemmas and how to avoid them. Journal of European Social Policy, 5(3), 199–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879500500302
- Nothdurfter, U. (2016). The street-level delivery of activation practices: Constraints and possibilities for a practice of citizenship. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3-4), 420–440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1137869
- Penz, O., Sauer, B., Hofbauer, J., & Glinsner, B. (2017). Post-bureaucratic encounters: Affective labour in public employment services. Critical Social Policy, 37(4), 540–561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018316681286
- Rákoczyová, M., Kotrusová, M., Horák, P., Kubát, J., Marešová, H., Schebelle, D., Táborská, M., Trbola, R., & Váňová, J. (2019). Realizace vybraných programů aktivní politiky zaměstnanosti a hodnocení jejich efektivity a účinnosti perspektivou zaměstnanců ÚP ČR v roce 2017. Dílčí podkladová studie I. Praha: VÚPSV. http://praha.vupsv.cz/Fulltext/vz_454.pdf
- Sirovátka, T., Rákoczyová, M., & Šimíková, I. (2019). Vyhodnocení indikátorů Strategie sociálního začleňování České republiky pro roky 2014-2020. VÚPSV.
- Van Berkel, R., & Knies, E. (2018). The front-line delivery of activation: Workerś preferences and antecedents. European Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 602–615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1297774
- Van Berkel, R., Larsen, F., & Caswell, D. (2018). Introduction: Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work in different European contexts. International Social Security Review, 71(4), 3–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12186
- Van Berkel, R., & van der Aa, P. (2012). Activation work: Policy programme administration or professional service provision? Journal of Social Policy, 41(3), 493–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279412000062
- Van Berkel, R., & Valkenburg, B. (Eds.). (2007). Making it personal. Individualising activation services in the EU. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgz1t
- Van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P., & & Larsen, F. (Eds.). (2017). Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work policies in Europe. Activating the unemployed. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694474
- Van Berkel, R., de Graaf, W., & Sirovátka, T. (Eds.). (2011). The governance of active welfare states in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306714_1
- Wright, S. (2013). On activation workers’ perceptions: A reply to Dunn (2). Journal of Social Policy, 42(4), 829–837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000494