References

• Adman, P., & Jansson, H. (2017). A field experiment on ethnic discrimination among local Swedish public officials. Local Government Studies, 43(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1244052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A. (2010). Arabic discrimination: Evidence from two lost letter experiments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 888–898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A. M., & Hammarstedt, M. (2008). Discrimination in the rental housing market: A field experiment on the internet. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 362–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriessen, I., Nievers, E., Dagevos, J., & Faulk, L. (2012). Ethnic discrimination in the Dutch labor market: Its relationship with job characteristics and multiple group membership. Work and Occupations, 39(3), 237–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888412444783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai, M., Bursell, M., & Nckby, L. (2016). The reverse gender gap in ethnic discrimination: Employer stereotypes of men and women with Arabic names. International Migration Review, 50(2), 385–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Å. (2013). Ekonomiskt bistånd – en urholkad stödform. Socionomens forskningssupplement, 34(6), 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmark, Å, & Lundström, T. (2007). Unitarian ideals and professional diversity in social work practice – the case of Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 10(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450601143658
   Google Scholar
• Bursell, M. (2014). The multiple burdens of foreign-named men – evidence from a field experiment on gendered ethnic hiring discrimination in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 30(3), 399–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, B., & Zeller, R. (1998). Measuring subgroup variation in social judgment research: A factorial survey approach. Social Science Research, 27(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1997.0613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, M. (2010). Experimental evidence of discrimination in the hiring of first- and second-generation immigrants. Labour, 24(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9914.2010.00482.x
   Google Scholar
• Di Stasio, V., & Larsen, E. N. (2020). The racialized and gendered workplace: Applying an intersectional lens to a field experiment on hiring discrimination in five european labor markets. Social Psychology Quarterly, 83(3), 229–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derous, E., & Pepermans, R. (2019). Gender discrimination in hiring: Intersectional effects with ethnicity and cognitive job demands. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 7(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000061
   Google Scholar
• Eliassi, B. (2015). Constructing cultural otherness within the Swedish welfare state: The cases of social workers in Sweden. Qualitative Social Work, 14(4), 554–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014559091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliassi, B. (2017). Conceptions of immigrant integration and racism among social workers in Sweden. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 28(1), 6–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2017.1249242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2007). Direct payments and social work practice: The significance of “street-level bureaucracy” in determining eligibility. The British Journal of Social Work, 37(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. The British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fäldt, J., & Kullberg, C. (2012). Implications of male and female same-gender dyads. Journal of social service research, 38(5), 712–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2012.723976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1987). Women, welfare and the politics of need interpretation. Hypatia, 2(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb00855.x
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). “Dependency” demystified: Inscriptions of power in a keyword of the welfare state. Social Politics, 1(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/1.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, B. (2013). Social assistance among immigrants and natives in Sweden. International Journal of Manpower, 34(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721311320654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, B., Hydén, L.-C., & Salonen, T. (1990). Beslut om socialbidrag i storstäder (rapport nr 141). Stockholms socialförvaltning, FoU-Byrån.
   Google Scholar
• Hussénius, K. (2019). Intersectional patterns of social assistance eligibility in Sweden. Nordic Social Work Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2019.1601636
   Google Scholar
• Hydén, L.-C., Kyhle Westermark, P., & Stenberg, S-Å. (1995). Att besluta om socialbidrag. En studie i 11 kommuner. Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, J. H. (2013). Social work beyond cultural otherisation. Nordic Social Work Research, 3(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2013.834510
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi, S. (2012). White masks/Arabic names: Immigrants and name changing in Sweden. Race and Class, 53(3), 65–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396811425986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg, C. (2005). Differences in the seriousness of problems and deservingness of help: Swedish social workers’ assessments of single mothers and fathers. British Journal of Social Work, 35(3), 373–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lodemel, I., & Moreira, A. (2014). Activation or workfare? Governance and the neo-liberal convergence. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsson, L., Griffin, G., & Nygren, G. (2016). Challenging the myth of gender equality in Sweden. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare [Socialstyrelsen]. (2018). Resultat från öppna jämförelser 2018 – Ekonomiskt bistånd.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (2004). Mechanisms of poverty alleviation: Anti-poverty effects of non-means-tested and means-tested benefits in five welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(4), 371–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928704046879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nybom, J. (2012). Aktivering av socialbidragstagare: om stöd och kontroll i socialtjänsten [Dissertation, Stockholm University].
   Google Scholar
• Pringle, K. (2010). Swedish welfare responses to ethnicity: The case of children and their families. European Journal of Social Work, 13(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450903135659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quillian, L., Heath, A., Pager, D., Midtbøen, A. H., Fleischmann, F., & Hexel, O. (2019). Do some countries discriminate more than others? Evidence from 97 field experiments of racial discrimination in hiring. Sociological Science, 6(18), 467–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a18
   Google Scholar
• Reeskens, T., & van der Meer, T. (2019). The inevitable deservingness gap: A study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928718768335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Kricheli-Katz, T. (2013). Intersecting cultural beliefs in social relations: Gender, race, and class binds and freedoms. Gender & Society, 27(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213479445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, E. (2015). Substance use and treatment needs: Constructions of gender in Swedish addiction care. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42(3), 188–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450915592912
   Google Scholar
• Shilliam, R. (2018). Race and the undeserving poor: From abolition to Brexit. Agenda Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Skogens, L. (2012). Approaching drinking problems in single male clients receiving social assistance. European Journal of Social Work, 15(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.516496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2010). Multilevel modelling. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2008). The color of devolution: Race, federalism, and the politics of social control. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 536–553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden [Statistiska Centralbyrån, SCB]. (2010). Könsstruktur per utbildning och yrke 1990–2030. SCB.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden [Statistiska Centralbyrån, SCB]. (2018). Folkmängd i riket, län och kommuner 31 december 2018 och befolkningsförändringar 1 oktober–31 december 2018. https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/befolkning/befolkningens-sammansattning/befolkningsstatistik/pong/tabell-och-diagram/kvartals–och-halvarsstatistik–kommun-lan-och-riket/kvartal-4-2018
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden [Statistiska Centralbyrån, SCB]. (2019). Summary of population statistics 1960–2018. SCB. https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/population/population-composition/population-statistics/pong/tables-and-graphs/yearly-statistics–the-whole-country/summary-of-population-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Stranz, H. (2007). Utrymme för variation [Scope for variation] [Dissertation, Stockholm University, Department of Social Work].
   Google Scholar
• Stranz, H., & Wiklund, S. (2011). I välfärdssamhällets marginal: Om socialbidragstagande bland ensamstående mödrar av svensk och utländsk härkomst. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 1, 42–62. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:196941/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stranz, H., Wiklund, S., & Karlsson, P. (2017). The wide-meshed safety net. Decision-making on social assistance eligibility in Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 20(5), 711–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorén, K. H. (2008). ‘Activation policy in action’: A street-level study of social assistance in the Swedish welfare state [Dissertation, University of Chicago].
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W. (2000). Who should get what and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy and Politics, 28(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573002500811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706059829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, L. (2012). Measuring social workers’ judgements: Why and how to use the factorial survey approach in the study of professional judgements. Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 364–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017310387463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar