References

• Arksey, H., & Kemp, P. (2016). Dimensions of choice: A narrative review of cash-for-care schemes. Working Paper, no DHP 2250. Social Policy Research Unit. University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, B. (2005). Does anybody care? Public and private responsibilities in Swedish Eldercare 1994-2000 [Dissertation]. Department of Economic History, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, H. (2018). At the intersection of marketisation, diversity and migration: Reshaping the provision of paid family eldercare in Sweden? European Journal of Social Work, 21(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1287060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, O. (2012). Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 &19. A guide for social scientists. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daatland, S. O., Herlofson, K., & Lima, I. A. (2011). Balancing generations: On the strength and character of family norms in the West and East of Europe. Ageing & Society, 31(7), 1159–1179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001315
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M. (2002). Care as a good for social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 31(02), 251–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279401006572
   Google Scholar
• Da Roit, B., & Le Bihan, B. (2010). Similar and yet so different: Cash-for-care in six European countries’ long-term care policies. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(3), 286–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00601.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey, A., Johansson, L., Malmberg, B., & Sundström, G. (2006). Unequal but equitable: An analysis of variation in old age care in Sweden. European Journal of Ageing, 3(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-006-0020-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunér, A., Bjälkebring, P., & Johansson, B. (2017). Merely a rhetorical promise? Older users’ opportunities for choice and control in Swedish individualised home care services. Aging & Society, 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17001210
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, J.-L., Kendall, J., Davey, V., & Knapp, M. (2007). Direct payments in england: Factors linked to variation in local provision. Journal of Social Policy, 36(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279406000390
   Google Scholar
• Forsell, E. (2004). Skyddandets förnuft. En studie om anhöriga till hjälpbehövande äldre som invandrat sent i livet [The logic of protection. A study of informal caregiving to older family members in immigrant families] [Dissertation]. Department of Social Work, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Forsell, E., Torres, S., & Olaison, A. (2014). Anhörigomsorg mot betalning: Biståndshandläggare om sent-i-livet-invandrares önskemål [Cash for care. Care managers on late-in-life immigrants’ request]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 21, 24–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2014.21.2.2416
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. (1987/88:176). Om äldreomsorgen inför 90-talet [Eldercare on the brink of the 90s].
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, P. H., & Lolle, H. (2013). The fragmented welfare state: Explaining local variations in services for older people. Journal of Social Policy, 42(2), 349–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279412001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, E., Long, H., & Parker, M. (2011). Informal caregiving for elders in Sweden: An analysis of current policy developments. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 23(4), 335–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2011.605630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, E., & Sundström, G. (2006). Policies and practices in support of family caregivers – filial obligations redefined in Sweden. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 18, 7–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2011.605630
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KOLADA. (2016). Kommun- och landstingdatabasen [Database for local and regional authorities]. https://www.kolada.se
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilly, M. B., Laporte, A., & Capote, P. C. (2007). Labor market work and home care’s unpaid caregivers: A systematic review of labor force participation rates, predictors of labor market withdrawal, and hours of work. Milbank Quarterly, 85(4), 641–690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00504.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellgren, F. (2017, September 5). Majoriteten vill ha pengar för vård av anhörig [A majority wants money for care of relatives]. Svenska Dagbladet. https://www.svd.se/sifo-manga-vill-ha-pengar-for-anhorigvard
   Google Scholar
• Moberg, L. (2017). Marketization in Swedish eldercare. Implications for users, professionals, and the state [Dissertation]. Department of Government, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Mossberg Sand, A.-B. (2000). Ansvar, kärlek och försörjning. Om anställda anhörigvårdare i Sverige [Responsibility, love and maintenance. Employed family caregivers in Sweden] [Dissertation]. Department of Sociology, Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• NBHW. (2001). Äldre – vård och omsorg år 2000 [Care and services for older people 2000]. Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• NBHW. (2007). Äldre – vård och omsorg år 2006 [Care and services for older people 2000]. Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Netten, A., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Fernandez, J. L., Challis, D., Glendinning, C., Jacobs, S., Manthorpe, J., Moran, N., Stevens, M., & Wilberforce, M. (2012). Personalisation through individual budgets: Does it work and for whom? British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1556–1573. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival guide: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, D. (2007). Is there really a Scandinavian social service model?: A comparison of childcare and elderlycare in six European countries. Acta Sociologica, 50(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699307080931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAERG. (2016). Kommuntyper [Municipal types]. https://tillvaxtverket.se
   Google Scholar
• SALAR. (2004). Äldreomsorg till nationella minoriteter och personer med utländsk bakgrund [Care and service to older people from national minorities and persons with a foreign background]. SKL.
   Google Scholar
• SALAR. (2015). Maktfördelning för tidsperioden 1994-2014 [Distribution of power in city council 1994-2014]. https://skl.se/
   Google Scholar
• SCB. (1991). Socialtjänststatistik 1982-1989 [Social service statistics 1982-1989]. SCB.
   Google Scholar
• SCB. (2016). Statistikdatabasen [Statistical database]. http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se.
   Google Scholar
• Sipilä, J. (Ed.) (1997). Social care services: The key to the Scandinavian Welfare Model.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K. (2001). Marketization of elderly care in Sweden. EIJS Working Paper, Series 137. Stockholm School of Economics, The European Institute of Japanese Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Public Employment Service. (2016). Statistik [Statistics]. http://qvs12ext.ams.se/QvAJAXZfc/opendoc.htm?document=extern%5Cmstatplus_extern.qvw&host=QVS%40w001765&anonymous=true%20&select=StartTrigger,1
   Google Scholar
• Szebehely, M., & Trydegård, G.-B. (2007). Omsorgstjänster för äldre och funktionshindrade: Skilda villkor, skilda trender? [Care services for older and disabled people: Different conditions, different trends?]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 14, 197–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2007.14.2-3.2589
   Google Scholar
• Trydegård, G.-B., & Thorslund, M. (2001). Inequality in the welfare state? Local variation in care of the elderly – the case of Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare, 10(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.00170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmanen, P. (2015). Kvinnors och mäns hjälp till sina gamla föräldrar – innehåll, omfattning och konsekvenser [Women’s and men’s help to older parents – content, scope and consequences]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 22, 111–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12108
   Google Scholar
• Ulmanen, P., & Szebehely, M. (2015). From the state to the family or to the market? Consequences of reduced residential eldercare in Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerson, C. (2004). Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on ‘cash for care’ schemes. Ageing & Society, 24(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeandle, S., & Ungerson, C. (2007). Conceptualizing cash for care: The origins of contemporary debates. In C. Ungerson, & S. Yeandle (Eds.), Cash for care in developed welfare states (pp. 1–12). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar