References

• Ahonen, L., & Degner, J. (2012). Negative peer cultures in juvenile institutional settings: Staff as couch coaches or couch slouches. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51(5), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2012.683238
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, D. J., Fluke, J. D., Dalgleish, L., & Kern, H. (2011). The decision-making ecology. From evidence to outcomes in child welfare: An international reader (pp. 24–40).
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, T. T. (2012). Learning to become a ‘gangster’? Journal of Youth Studies, 15(6), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.671930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, F., & Lambie, I. (2015). What makes youth run or stay? A review of the literature on absconding. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1046–1064. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, A. (2018). Trapped in a vice: The consequences of confinement for young people. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crea, T. M. (2010). Balanced decision making in child welfare: Structured processes informed by multiple perspectives. Administration in Social Work, 34(2), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03643101003609529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danske Regioner. (2020). Statistik 2019 for de sikrede institutioner.
   Google Scholar
• Forkby, T., & Höjer, S. (2011). Navigations between regulations and gut instinct: The unveiling of collective memory in decision-making processes where teenagers are placed in residential care. Child & Family Social Work, 16(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00724.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forkby, T., Höjer, S., & Liljegren, A. (2016). Making sense of common sense: Examining the decision-making of politically appointed representatives in Swedish child protection. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2016). Sense-making in a social work office: An ethnographic study of safeguarding judgements. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, A. (2017). Confined to care: Girls’ gendered vulnerabilities in secure institutions. Gender & Society, 31(5), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217726968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, A., & Prieur, A. (2019). ‘So why am I here?’ Ambiguous practices of protection, treatment and punishment in Danish secure institutions for young people. British Journal of Criminology, 29(5), 1161–1177. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz018
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, A., & Refsgaard, R. C. (2020). Sidste udvej – om at anbringe og blive anbragt på sikret institution. Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2014). Proces, emergens og meningsskabelse. In S. Vikkelsø, & P. Kjær (Eds.), Klassisk og moderne organisationsteori, 279–299. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hitzler, S., & Messmer, H. (2010). Group decision-making in child welfare and the pursuit of participation. Qualitative Social Work, 9(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010372156
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, D., Brady, B., & Forkan, C. (2018). Supporting children’s participation in decision making: A systematic literature review exploring the effectiveness of participatory processes. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(7), 1985–2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2007). Youth justice? The impact of system contact on patterns of desistance from offending. European Journal of Criminology, 4(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807077186
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2019). Effective child protection. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nouwen, E., Decuyper, S., & Put, J. (2012). Team decision making in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(10), 2101–2116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, M. (2019). UN global study on children deprived of liberty. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, D., & Turney, D. (2014). Making threshold decisions in child protection: A conceptual analysis. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1472–1490. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesch-Marsh, A. (2012). Better together? Learning lessons for group decision-making practice from a study of secure accommodation in Scotland. Child & Family Social Work, 17(4), 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00804.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesch-Marsh, A. (2014). ‘Out of control’: Making sense of the behaviour of young people referred to secure accommodation. British Journal of Social Work, 44(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesch-Marsh, A. (2018). Professional relationships and decision making in social work: Lessons from a Scottish case study of secure accommodation decision making. Qualitative Social Work, 17(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016680285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrøder, I., Sørensen, M. H., & Ebsen, F. C. (2020). Bedre gruppebeslutninger blandt sagsbehandlere. Københavns Professionshøjskole.
   Google Scholar
• Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. Children & Society, 15(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.617
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2017). Decision making, assessment and risk in social work. Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2003). Hindsight, foresight and insight: The challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000091833
   Google Scholar
• van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., Holtan, A., & Thomas, N. (2012). Obstacles for child participation in care and protection cases – Why Norwegian social workers find it difficult. Child Abuse Review, 21(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, M. A., Sallnäs, M., & Lundström, T. (2014). Good idea, bad prerequisite, zero result – The meaning of context in implementing aftercare for young people in secure unit care. Journal of Children’s Services, 9(3).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M., Barclay, A., Hunter, L., Kendrick, A., Malloch, M., Hill, M., & McIvor, G. (2005). Secure accommodation in Scotland: Its role and relationship with ‘Alternative’ Services. Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1639–1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar