References

• Astvik, W., & Aronsson, G. (1999). Home care workers as specialists or generalists – quality in work and care, Proceedings/Work, Stress and Health ´99, Organization of Work in a Global Economy, March 11–13, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson, R., & Bihari Axelsson, S. (2006). Integration and collaboration in public health – a conceptual framework. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 21(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M. (1999). Working in partnership in child protection: The conflicts. British Journal of Social Work, 29(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark, A., & Lundström, T. (2007). Unitarian ideals and professional diversity in social work practice – the case of sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 10(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450601143658
   Google Scholar
• Biehal, N. (2005). Working with adolescents at risk of out of home care: The effectiveness of specialist teams. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(9), 1045–1059. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom, B. (2004). Specialization in social work practice – effects on interventions in the personal social services. Journal of Social Work, 4(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017304042419
   Google Scholar
• Blom, B., Perlinski, M., & Morén, S. (2009). Organisational structure as barrier or support in the personal social services? “Breaking Down the Barriers”, Staffordshire University, September 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2010). Literature reviews and the hermeneutic circle. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bømler, T. (2012). Fra specialisering – og tilbage til specialisering. Tidsskrift for forskning og praksis i socialt arbejde, 24, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, A., Seale, E., Leiter, J., & Taylor, T. (2011). Differentiation and integration of welfare-to-work service delivery in North Carolina. Administration in Social Work, 35(5), 475–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03643107.2011.614199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. A. (2016). Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(12), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0019-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cambridge, P., Beadle-Brown, J., Milne, A., Mansell, J., & Whelton, B. (2011). Adult protection: The processes and outcomes of adult protection referrals in two English local authorities. Journal of Social Work, 11(3), 247–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017310379255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge, P., & Parkes, T. (2005). The tension between mainstream competence and specialization in adult protection: An evaluation of the role of the adult protection co-ordinator. British Journal of Social Work, 36(2), 299–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., Berg, E., Ellison, M., & Barry, J. (2017). Reconfiguring professional autonomy? The case of social work in the UK. In B. Blom, L. Evertsson, & M. Perlinski (Eds.), Social and caring professions in European welfare states: Policies, services and professional practices (pp. 69–82). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, E., & Egelund, T. (2002). Børnesager: Evaluering af den forebyggende indsats. Danish National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cohon, J. D., Fritz, D., Brady, M., Cooper, B. A., Needell, B., & Smith, K. K. (2001). Specialized foster care for medically complex, drug-exposed, HIV positive infants: The baby moms program. Children and Youth Services Review, 23(11), 831–863. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-7409(01)00163-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. A., & Fauser, B. C. J. M. (2005). Editorial: balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human Reproduction Update, 11(2), 103–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duke, M. R., Schebler, K., & Ruhland-Petty, T. (2015). Workplace dynamics in affiliational organizations: A case study of a one-stop agency serving victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 30(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2015.1080597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekström, V. (2018). Carriers of the troublesome violence – the social services’ support for female victims of domestic violence. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellem, K., Wilson, J., & Chui, W. (2012). Effective responses to offenders with intellectual disabilities: Generalist and specialist services working together. Australian Social Work, 65(3), 398–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2011.625433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, D. W., & Okamura, A. (2007). A nation of immigrants: A call for a specialization in immigrant well-being. Journal of Ethnic And Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 16(3-4), 103–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J051v16n03_08
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. P., & Elnitsky, C. (2012). Health and social services integration: A review of concepts and models. Social Work in Public Health, 27(5), 441–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2010.525149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glouberman, S., & Zimmerman, B. (2002). Complicated and complex systems: What would successful reform of medicare look like? Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, Discussion Paper 8.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S., & Trowler, I. (2012). Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work. Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Green, G., Thorpe, J., & Traupmann, M. (2005). The sprawling thicket: Knowledge and specialisation in forensic social work. Australian Social Work, 58(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0748.2005.00199.x
   Google Scholar
• Grell, P., Ahmadi, N., & Blom, B. (2016). ‘Sometimes it’s really complicated!’ – clients with complex needs on their encounters with specialised personal social service organisations in Sweden. Nordic Social Work Research, 6(3), 188–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2016.1156017
   Google Scholar
• Grell, P., Blom, B., & Ahmadi, N. (2020). Conditions for helping relations in specialized personal social services – a client perspective on the influence of organizational struc-ture. Nordic Social Work Research, 10(4), 356–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2019.1596148
   Google Scholar
• Haack, M., Matthiessen, A., & Zeeberg, B. (2018). Det bøjlige helhedssyn. In A. M. Willumsen (Ed.), Helhedsorienteret socialt arbejde med udsatte familier (pp. 73–89). Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I., Kildal, A., & Nilssen, E. (2011). Mot en spesialisert veilederrolle i Nav? Endokumentasjonsrapport. UNI research, Notat 12, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hitzler, S., & Messmer, H. (2010). Group decision-making in child welfare and the pursuit of participation. Qualitative Social Work, 9(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010372156
   Google Scholar
• Horwath, J., & Morrison, T. (2007). Collaboration, integration and change in children’s services: Critical issues and key ingredients. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., Hope, R. L., Nwokolo, N., Ward, B., Jones, R., Von Schweitzer, M., & Boag, F. (2013). Meeting complex needs: Young people with HIV in London. HIV Medicine, 14(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2012.01049.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knei-Paz, C. (2009). The central role of the therapeutic bond in a social Agency setting. Journal of Social Work, 9(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017308101821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudret, S., Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2019). Self-monitoring personality trait at work: An integrative narrative review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., & Hazlett-Knudsen, R. (2012). Change and continuity in state human service agencies: 1986–2006. Administration in Social Work, 36(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03643107.2011.562065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marttila, A., Johansson, E., Whitehead, M., & Burström, B. (2012). Dilemmas in providing resilience-enhancing social services to long-term social assistance clients: A qualitative study of Swedish social workers. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 517–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, A. R., & Sousa, L. M. (2004). How multiproblem families try to find support in social services. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0265053042000180590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matscheck, D., Piuva, K., Eriksson, L., & Åberg, M. (2019). The coordinated individual plan – is this a solution for complex organizations to handle complex needs? Nordic Social Work Research, 9(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1489886
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, A., Zeeberg, B., & Haack, M. (2017). Specialisering – et tveægget sværd? En undersøgelse af børn-og ungeafdelinger set fra et sagsbehandler- og et familieperspektiv. Metropols skriftserie.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, N., Scourfield, J., Featherstone, B., Holland, S., & Tolman, R. (2012). Engaging fathers in child welfare services: A narrative review of recent research evidence. Child & Family Social Work, 17(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00827.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, M., & Thomson, L. (2011). Families’ views on a coordinated family support service. Family Matters, (89), 71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Meeuwisse, A., Scaramuzzino, R., & Swärd, H. (2011). Everyday realities and visionary ideals among social workers in the Nordic countries: A matter of specialization and work tasks? Nordic Social Work Research, 1(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2011.562030
   Google Scholar
• Minas, R. (2005). Administrating poverty: Studies of intake organization and social assistance in Sweden [dissertation]. Stockholm, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Munday, B. (2007). Group of specialists on user involvement in social services and Integrated Social service delivery (CS-US). Integrated Social services in Europe. Report. Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Guzmán, C., Fischer, C., Chia, E., & LaBrenz, C. (2015). Child welfare in Chile: Learning from international experiences to improve family interventions. Social Sciences, 4(1), 219–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4010219
   Google Scholar
• Murty, S. A. (2005). The future of rural social work. Advances in Social Work, 6(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18060/86
   Google Scholar
• Orme, J. G., & Buehler, C. (2001). Foster family characteristics and behavioral and emotional problems of foster children: A narrative review. Family Relations, 50(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostberg, F. (2014). Using ‘Consensual ideology’: A way to sift reports in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 44(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2009). From seebohm to think family: Reflections on 40 years of policy change of statutory children's social work in England. Child & Family Social Work, 14(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N., Thorpe, D., & Wattam, C. (1997). Child protection: Risk and the moral order. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Perlinski, M., Blom, B., & Morén, S. (2012). Different worlds within Swedish personal social services : Social worker’s views on conditions for client work in different organisational models. Social Work & Society, 10(2), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: A guide to methods. Maidenhead. Open University Press, McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, P. (2016). A specialist’s perspective on the value of generalist practice: A qualitative network analysis. Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 610–626. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316644693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. S., & Haight, W. (2012). Engaging child welfare-involved families impacted by substance misuse: Scottish policies and practices. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(10), 1992–2001. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2011). Dilemmas of inter-professional collaboration: Can they be resolved? Children & Society, 25(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenheck, R., Morrissey, J., Lam, J., Calloway, M., Stolar, M., Johnsen, M., Randolph, F., Blasinsky, M., & Goldman, H. (2001). Service delivery and community: Social capital, service systems integration, and outcomes among homeless persons with severe mental illness. Health Services Research, 36(4), 691–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. P., Davis, R. K., & Yang, H. (2001). Reintegration services and the likelihood of adult imprisonment: A longitudinal study of adjudicated delinquents. Research on Social Work Practice, 11(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/104973150101100303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandlie, H. C., Langsether, Å, Sørvoll, J., Skårberg, A., & Hansen, T. (2011). Organisering og planlegging av boligsosialt arbeid i norske kommuner – fire casestudier. NOVA Report 5/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Skogens, L. (2007). Hur bemöts manliga socialbidragstagare med alkoholproblem? [dissertation]. Stockholm University, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Fallon, B., Fluke, J. D., Mishna, F., & Decker Pierce, B. (2019). Organizational structure and the ongoing service decision: The influence of role specialization and service integration. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 43(5), 375–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2019.1661928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Fluke, J. D., Fallon, B., Mishna, F., & Decker Pierce, B. (2017). Role specialization and service integration in child welfare: Does organizational structure influence the decision to refer to supportive services? Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 139–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Fluke, J., Fallon, B., Mishna, F., & Pierce, B. D. (2018). Child welfare organizations: Do specialization and service integration impact placement decisions? Child Abuse & Neglect, 76, 573–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt, T. (2011). Families with multiple problems: Some challenges in identifying and providing services to those experiencing adversities across the life course. Journal of Social Work, 11(4), 343–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017310379256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundell, K., & Humlesjö, E. (1996). Sociala utredningar med fokus på barn. Social services, R&D unit.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar, M., Liebenberg, L., & Ikeda, J. (2012). Young people with complex needs: Designing coordinated interventions to promote resilience across child welfare, juvenile corrections, mental health and education services. British Journal of Social Work, 44(3), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willumsen, A. M., & Leth, L. A. (2018). Changing user-perspectives in a changing organisation of casework for families at risk. Practice, 30(5), 359–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2018.1461822
   Google Scholar
• Winter, K. (2009). Relationships matter: The problems and prospects for social workers’ relationships with young children in care. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 450–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar