References

• Aronson, J., & Smith, K. (2010). Managing restructured social services: Expanding the social? British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baginsky, M., Hickman, B., Harris, J., Manthorpe, J., Sanders, M., O’Higgins, A., Schoenwald, E., & Clayton, V. (2020). Evaluation of MTM’s Signs of Safety Pilots Evaluation report. Department for Education. United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Baginsky, M., Moriarty, J., & Manthorpe, J. (2019). Signs of safety: lessons learnt from evaluations. Journal of Children’s Services, 14(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-11-2018-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, K., Roets, G., & Roose, R. (2018a). Social work, participation, and poverty. Journal of Social Work, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318760789.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, K., Roets, G., & Roose, R. (2018b). Social work, poverty and anti-poverty strategies: Creating cultural forums. British Journal of Social Work, 48(8), 2381–2399. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradt, L., Roets, G., Roose, R., Rosseel, Y., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2015). Poverty and decision making in child welfare and protection: Deepening the bias–need debate. British Journal of Social Work, 45(7), 2161–2175. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children's statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1046–1064. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting, L., Davidson, G., McCartan, C., Hanratty, J., Bywaters, P., Mason, W., & Steils, N. (2018). The association between child maltreatment and adult poverty–A systematic review of longitudinal research. Child Abuse & Neglect, 77, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bywaters, P. (2015). Inequalities in child welfare: Towards a new policy, research and action agenda. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B., Jones, C., Morris, K., Scourfield, J., Sparks, T., & Webb, C. (2018). Inequalities in English child protection practice under austerity: A universal challenge? Child & Family Social Work, 23(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Sparks, T., Bos, E., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., & Scourfield, J. (2015). Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: Explaining the ‘inverse intervention law’. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bywaters, P., Kwhali, J., Brady, G., Sparks, T., & Bos, E. (2017). Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Ethnic inequalities in child protection and Out-of-Home care intervention rates. British Journal of Social Work, 47(7), 1884–1902. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Chung, D., & Evans, T. (2015). Complexities of discretion in social services in the third sector. European Journal of Social Work, 18(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2014.888049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, J. (2016). The pitfalls and promise of focus groups as a data collection method. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(2), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115570065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decoene, J. W., Dewanckel, L., Roets, G., & Roose, R. (2020). Onderzoek naar de handelingsstrategieën van consulenten in het omgaan met risico's in armoedesituaties: Eindrapport januari 2020. https://www.ugent.be/pp/swsp/nl/actueel/nieuws/2020-02-07-onderzoek-handelingstrategieen.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., & Warner, J. (2018). Let's stop feeding the risk monster: Towards a social model of’ child protection’. Families, Relationships and Societies, 7(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674316X14552878034622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., Morris, K., Daniel, B., Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Bunting, L., & Mirza, N. (2017). Poverty, inequality, child abuse and neglect: Changing the conversation across the UK in child protection? Children and Youth Services Review, 97, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M., & Teram, E. (2013). Overt and covert ways of responding to moral injustices in social work practice: Heroes and mild-mannered social work bipeds. British Journal of Social Work, 43(7), 1312–1329. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, L. (2016). Exploring the concepts of recognition and shame for social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(4), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2015.1132689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. (2008). Thinking with the Sardinian: Antonio Gramsci and social work. European Journal of Social Work, 11(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450802075592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (Eds.). (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. International policy exchange series. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2006). Risk assessment in child protection: Problem rather than solution? Australian Social Work, 59(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070500449804
   Google Scholar
• Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children’s service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(5), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00005-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (2017). Learning from others: An auto ethnographic exploration of children and families social work, poverty and the capability approach. Qualitative Social Work, 16(4), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015620946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimer, M., Näsman, E., & Palme, J. (2018). Vulnerable children's rights to participation, protection, and provision: The process of defining the problem in Swedish child and family welfare. Child & Family Social Work, 23(2), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2014). Complexity and integrated working in children's services. British Journal of Social Work, 44(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, S., & Griffiths, H. (2000). Reflections on risk in child protection: Is it time fora shift in paradigms? Child and Family Social Work, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2000.00145.x
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyslop, I., & Keddell, E. (2018). Outing the elephants: Exploring a new paradigm for child protection social work. Social Sciences, 7(7), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7070105
   Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2014). Theorising the signs of safety approach to child protection social work: Positioning, codes and power. Children and Youth Services Review, 47(1), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumer-Nevo, M. (2005). Listening to ‘life knowledge’: A new research direction in poverty studies. International Journal of Social Welfare, 14(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-6866.2005.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumer-Nevo, M. (2016). Poverty-Aware social work: A paradigm for social work practice with people in poverty. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1793–1808. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2016). Rediscovering the social question. European Journal of Social Work, 19(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1082984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melssen, N., & Jongmans, E. (2013). Risico-regelreflex in de jeugdzorg? https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2013/11/12/risico-regelreflex-in-de-jeugdzorg
   Google Scholar
• Morris, K., Mason, W., Bywaters, P., Featherstone, B., Daniel, B., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Hooper, J., Mirza, N., Scourfield, J., & Webb, C. (2018). Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions. Child & Family Social Work, 23(3), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2010). Learning to reduce risk in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oak, E. (2016). A minority report for social work? The predictive risk model (PRM) and the Tuituia assessment framework in addressing the needs of New Zealand’s vulnerable children. British Journal of Social Work, 46(5), 1208–1223. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. (2011). Social justice: Alive and well (partly) in social work practice? International Social Work, 54(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872810382682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods – 3rd edition. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G., Roose, R., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2013). Researching child poverty: Towards a lifeworld orientation. Childhood, 20(4), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568212475101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, G., Roose, R., Schiettecat, T., & Vandenbroeck, M. (2016). Reconstructing the foundations of joined-up working: From organisational reform towards a joint engagement of child and family services. British Journal of Social Work, 46(2), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, R., Roets, G., & Schiettecat, T. (2014). Implementing a strengths perspective in child welfare and protection: A challenge not to be taken lightly. European Journal of Social Work, 17(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.739555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saar-Heiman, Y., & Gupta, A. (2019). The poverty-aware paradigm for child protection: A critical framework for policy and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 0, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz093
   Google Scholar
• Schiettecat, T., Roets, G., & Vandenbroeck, M. (2017). Hide and seek: Political agency of social workers in supporting families living in poverty. British Journal of Social Work, 0, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx129
   Google Scholar
• Scourfield, J., & Welsh, I. (2003). Risk, reflexivity and social control in child protection: New times or same old story? Critical Social Policy, 23(3), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183030233005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2007). Social work, restructuring and everyday resistance: ‘Best practices’ gone underground. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti oppressive practice: Building transformative, politicized social work (pp. 145–159). Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spratt, T., Devaney, J., & Frederick, J. (2019). Adverse childhood experiences: Beyond Signs of Safety, reimagining the organization and practice of social work with children and families. British Journal of Social Work, 49, 2042–2058. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz023
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, S. (2010). ‘Speaking back’ to fear: Responding to the moral dilemmas of risk in social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1065–1080. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, J., & Schmidt, G. (2011). Race, poverty and child protection decision making. British Journal of Social Work, 41(6), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toros, K. (2021). A systematic review of children’s participation in child protection decision-making: Tokenistic presence or not? Children & Society, 35(3), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnell, A. (2012). Signs of safety. http://www.signsofsafety.net/
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1999). Signs of safety: A solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework. W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. (2015). Children's and young people's participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaams Parlement. (2013). Decreet integrale jeugdhulp. Brussel: Vlaams Parlement (In Dutch).
   Google Scholar
• Vyvey, E., Roose, R., De Wilde, L., & Roets, G. (2014). Dealing with risk in child and family social work: From an anxious to a reflexive professional? Social Sciences, 3(4), 758–770. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3040758
   Google Scholar