References

• Aakvik, A., Monstad, K., & Holmås, T. H. (2014). Evaluating the effect of a national labour and welfare administration reform (NAV-reform) on employment, social insurance and social assistance (Report 4-2014). Uni Research Rokkansenteret.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A. (2019). Measures of accountability and delegated discretion in activation work: Lessons from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service. European Journal of Social Work, 22(4), 664–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astvik, W., Melin, M., & Allvin, M. (2014). Survival strategies in social work: A study of how coping strategies affect service quality, professionalism and employee health. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2013.801879
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Westman, M., van Emmerik, I. H., & Demerouti, E. (2009). The crossover of work engagement between working couples. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(3), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910939313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergene, A. C., & Hansen, P. B. (2016). A historical legacy untouched by time and space? The hollowing-out of the Norwegian model of industrial relations Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 6(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v6i1.4907
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z., & Marston, G. (Eds.) (2013). Work and the welfare state: Street-level organizations and workfare politics. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., & Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2015). Responses from the frontline: How organisations and street-level bureaucrats deal with economic sanctions. European Journal of Social Security, 17(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271501700102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswell, D., & Larsen, F. (2017). Frontline work in the delivery of Danish activation policies – and how governance, organizational and occupational contexts shape this. In R. van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka, & F. Larsen (Eds.), Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work policis in Europe: Activating the unemployed (pp. 163–180). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chiron, B., Michinov, E., Olivier-Chiron, E., Laffon, M., & Rusch, E. (2010). Job satisfaction, life satisfaction and burnout in French anaesthetists. Journal of health psychology, 15(6), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309360072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, M., Dugdill, L., & Tattersall, A. (2009). Working in the public sector: A case study of social services. Journal of Social Work, 9(4), 420–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017309342177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). From thought to action: Employee work engagement and Job performance. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 147–163). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O., & Konle-Seidl, R. (2008). Bringing the jobless into work? Experiences with activation schemes in Europe and the US. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eleveld, A. (2017). The sanctions mitigation paradox in welfare to work benefit schemes. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 39, 449.
   Google Scholar
• Fiabane, E., Giorgi, I., Sguazzin, C., & Argentero, P. (2013). Work engagement and occupational stress in nurses and other healthcare workers: The role of organisational and personal factors. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(17–18), 2614–2624. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., & Borg, E. (2014). NAV-reformen 2014. En oppfølgingsstudie av lokalkontorenes organisering etter innholdsreformen [The NAV reform 2014. A follow up study of the organization of local offices after the content reform] (Report 13/2014). The Work Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., & Borg, E. (2016). Hvorfor lykkes ikke NAV-kontorene med å jobbe mer arbeidsrettet? [Why do the NAV offices fail to achieve their goals of more people in work and activity?]. Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 33(1-02), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-7989-2016-01-02-01
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gjersøe, H. M., Leseth, A., & Vilhena, S. (2019). Frontline implementation of welfare conditionality in Norway: A maternalistic practice. Social Policy & Administration, 54(3), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, J. K., & Blacksmith, N. (2010). Employee engagement an the psychology of joining, staying. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, N. Garcea, C. D. N. Garcea, & N. Page (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work (pp. 121–130). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (1999). Social services and welfare-to-work: Prospects for the social work profession. Administration in Social Work, 23(3-4), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v23n03_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. S., & Weihe, H. W. (2021). samfunnsarbeid - sosialt arbeid [Community work – social work]. Great Norwegian Encyclopedia. https://snl.no/samfunnsarbeid_-_sosialt_arbeid
   Google Scholar
• Hvinden, B. (1994). Divided against itself: A study of integration in welfare bureaucracy. Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen, J. T., & Tufte, P. A. (2014). Discretionary decision-making in a changing context of activation policies and welfare reforms. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, C. J., & Glaser, B. E. (2006). Toward a general analytic framework: Organizational settings, policy goals, and street-level behavior. Administration & Society, 38(3), 335–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399706288581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. V., Hall, E. M., & Theorell, T. (1989). Combined effects of job strain and social isolation on cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in a random sample of the Swedish male working population. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 15(4), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasek, R. (1989). The political implications of psychosocial work redesign: A model of the psychosocial class structure. International Journal of Health Services, 19(3), 481–508. https://doi.org/10.2190/66AM-Q4PF-PUHK-5BT1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individualistic fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2009). Another dimension of welfare reform: The implementation of the employment insurance programme in Korea. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Carswell, J. J., & Allen, N. J. (2000). A meta-analytic review of occupational commitment: Relations with person-and work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performing spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of management review, 20(3), 645–678. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C., King, R., & Chenoweth, L. (2002). Social work, stress and burnout: A review. Journal of Mental Health, 11(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230020023642
   Google Scholar
• Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., Mäkikangas, A., & Feldt, T. (2010). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A qualitative review and directions for future research. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 111–128). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mänttäri-van der Kuip, M. (2016). Moral distress among social workers: The role of insufficient resources. International Journal of Social Welfare, 25(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, J., & Austin, M. J. (2006). The role of social workers in welfare to work programs: International perspectives on policy and practice. Journal of Policy Practice, 5(2-3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1300/J508v05n02_10
   Google Scholar
• Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2009). Managing knowledge work and innovation. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U. (2016). The street-level delivery of activation policies: Constraints and possibilities for a practiceof citizenship. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3-4), 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1137869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olley, B. O. (2003). A comparative study of burnout syndrome among health professionals in a Nigerian teaching hospital. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Science, 32(2), 297–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, P., & Dierckx, D. (2013). To work or not to work? The role of the organisational context for social workers’ perceptions on activation. British Journal of Social Work, 43(6), 1170–1189. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatinelli, S. (2010). Activation and rescaling: Interrelated questions in social policy. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe (pp. 75–102). Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, T. (2020). Associations between workplace learning patterns, social support and perceived competency. Human Resource Development International, 23(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2019.1627512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, T., & Fekjær, S. B. (2019). Frontline workers’ competency in activation work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 28(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, T., & Terum, L. I. (2019). Kompetanse [Competency]. In A. H. Bay, A. Hatland, T. Hellevik, & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Trygd I aktiveringens tid [Social security in the age of activation] (pp. 325–346). Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, T., & Terum, L. I. (2020). Frontline managers’ perceptions and justifications of behavioural conditionality. Social Policy & Administration, 54(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., & Bresó, E. (2010). How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, stress & coping, 23(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800802609965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanne, B., Torp, S., Mykletun, A., & Dahl, A. A. (2005). The Swedish demand—control—support questionnaire (DCSQ): Factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency in a large population. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 33(3), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14034940410019217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Moreno, E., de La Fuente Roldán, I. N., Gallardo-Peralta, L. P., & Barrón López de Roda, A. (2015). Burnout, informal social support and psychological distress among social workers. British Journal of Social Work, 45(8), 2368–2386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
   Google Scholar
• Schramm-Nielsen, J., Lawrence, P., & Sivesind, K. H. (2004). Management in scandinavia: Culture, context and change. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht work engagement scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivenes, M., & Trygstad, S. C. (2010). When whistle-blowing works: The Norwegian case. Human Relations, 63(7), 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709353954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terum, L. I., & Sadeghi, T. (2019). Medarbeidernes kompetanse ved NAV-kontorene: Endringer i utdanningsbakgrunn, læring på arbeidsplassen og kompetanse, 2011-2018 [Workers’ competency at the NAV-offices: Changes in educational background, workplace learning and competency, 2011-2018]. Skriftserien OsloMet.
   Google Scholar
• Terum, L. I., & Sadeghi, T. (2021). Hva gjør individuell tilpasning av aktivitetskrav utfordrende? [What makes individualisation of activity requirements challenging?]. Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 38(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-7989-2021-01-03
   Google Scholar
• Ulmestig, R., & Marston, G. (2015). Street-level perceptions of procedural rights for young unemployed people–a comparative study between Sweden and Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 49(3), 394–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12085
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R. (2017). State of the art in frontline studies of welfare-to-work. A literature review. In R. van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka, & F. Larsen (Eds.), Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work policies in Europe: Activating the unemployed (pp. 12–35). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R., & Knies, E. (2016). Performance management, caseloads and the frontline provision of social services. Social Policy & Administration, 50(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R., & Knies, E. (2018). The frontline delivery of activation: Workers’ preferences and their antecedents. European Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1297774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenabeele, W. (2011). Who wants to deliver public service? Do institutional antecedents of public service motivation provide an answer? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X10394403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilhena, S. (2020). Is it because you can’t, or don’t want to? The implementation of frontline sanctions in Norwegian social assistance. European Journal of Social Work, 24(3), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1713052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, L. A., & Nye, L. G. (1992). Organizational goal congruence and job attitudes revisited (No. DOT/FAA/AM-92/8). Civil Aerospace Medical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., Fletcher, D. R., & Stewart, A. B. (2020). Punitive benefit sanctions, welfare conditionality, and the social abuse of unemployed people in Britain: Transforming claimants into offenders? Social Policy & Administration, 54(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar