References

• Addams, J. (1920). Immigration: A field neglected by the scholar. In P. Davis (Ed.), Immigration and Americanization: Selected readings. (pp. 245–263) Ginn & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Alvaréz-Peréz, P., López Pelaez, A., & Harris, V. (2021). Methodological pathways to portray superdiversity: A few concluding thoughts. Current Sociology, 70(2), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120983342.
   Google Scholar
• Asén, K., Julkunen, I., & Saurama, E. (2021). Contemporary urban social work: A scoping review. Nordic Social Work Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2021.1890192
   Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. (2015). (Super)diversity and the migration-social work nexus: A new lens on the field of access and inclusion? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(4), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.980291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, L., & de Roo, G. (2016). Planning of undefined becoming: First encounters of planners beyond the plan. Planning Theory, 15(1), 42–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214542631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairtlough, A. (2017). Professional leadership for social work practitioners and educators. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. (2021). Children’s life in superdiversity contexts: Impacts on the construction of a children’s citizenship – the Portuguese case. Current Sociology, 70(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120983340.
   Google Scholar
• Foner, N. (2017). A research comment: What’s new about Super- Diversity? Journal of American Ethnic History, 36(4), 49. https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerethnhist.36.4.0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldof, D. (2011). New challenges for urban social work and urban social work research. European Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.516621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldof, D. (2016). Superdiversity and the city. In C. Williams (Ed.), Social work and the city. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51623-7_5
   Google Scholar
• Geldof, D., Schrooten, M., & Withaeckx, S. (2017). Transmigration: The rise of flexible migration strategies as part of superdiversity. Policy & Politics, 45(4), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14972774011385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genova, A., & Barberis, E. (2018). Social workers and intercultural mediators: Challenges for collaboration and intercultural awareness. European Journal of Social Work, 22(19), 908–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1452196
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. (2017). Mooring “super-diversity” to a brutal migration milieu. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(9), 1562–1573. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1300296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrikari, T., & Rauhala, P.-L. (2018). Towards glocal social work in the era of compressed modernity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P., & van Ewijk, H. (2019). Finding common ground: How superdiversity is unsettling social work education. European Journal of Social Work, 22(1), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1366431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazepov, Y. (Ed.). (2010). Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, A., Nylund, M., Pesonen, A.-M., Julkunen, I., Saurama, E., Tapola-Haapala, M., Heino, P., Nurmi, A., & Asén, K. ( 2019). Kotoutuminen on muutakin kuin koulutusta ja työtä. Dialogi. https://dialogi.diak.fi/2019/03/21/kotoutuminen-on-muutakin-kuin-koulutusta-ja-tyota/
   Google Scholar
• Livholts, M., & Bryant, L. (Eds.). (2017). Social work in a glocalised world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• López-Pelaez, A., Aguilar-Tablada, M., Erro-Garcés, A., & Pereéz-Garcia, R. (2021). Superdiversity and social policies in a complex society: Social challenges in the 21st century. Current Sociology, 70(2), 166–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120983344
   Google Scholar
• Mulinari, P., Tahvilzadeh, N., & Kings, L. (2020). Dekolonialt socialt arbete – om relationen mellan gräsrotsrörelser och kritiskt socialt arbete i den Urbana periferin. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 27(3–4), 249–267.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, B. (2009). Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: An empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00840.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y., & Kemp, S. (2006). “Little Alien Colonies”: representations of immigrants and their neighborhoods social work discourse, 1875–1924. Social Service Review, 80(4), 705–734. https://doi.org/10.1086/507934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M., & Hall, E. (2019). Social work theory, knowledge and practice. In M. Payne, & E. Hall (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Work Theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J., Brand, T., Bradby, H., & Padilla, B. (2019). Healthcare bricolage in Europe’s superdiverse neighbourhoods: A mixed methods study. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1325. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7709-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righard, E. (2018). Conceptualising social work through the lens of transnationalism: Challenges and ways ahead. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 8(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2018-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, I. (Ed.). (2016). Satow's diplomatic practice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2018). The contemporary context of relationship-based practice. In G. Ruch, D. Turney, & A. Ward (Eds.), Relationship-based social work: Getting to the heart of practice. Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiano, N., & Perry, T. (2019). Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work, 18(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017700701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2004). Respect: The formation of character in an age of inequality. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Ian. (2011). Social work research-an urban desert? European Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.516615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw I. (2015). Sociological social workers: A history of the present? Nordic Social Work Research, 5(suppl. 1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2015.1036908
   Google Scholar
• Van Robaeys, B., van Ewijk, H., & Dierckx, D. (2018a). The challenge of superdiversity for the identity of the social work profession: Experiences of social workers in ‘De Sloep’ in Ghent, Belgium. International Social Work, 61(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872816631600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Robaeys, B., Raeymaeckers, P., & van Ewijk, H. (2018b). Contextual–transformational social work in superdiverse contexts: An evaluative perspective by service users and social workers. Qualitative Social Work, 17(5), 676–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016683793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2015). Introduction: Migration, cities, diversities ‘old’ and ‘new’. In S. Vertovec (Eds.), Diversities old and new. Global diversities. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137495488_1
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. (2016). Social work and the city. Urban themes in 21st-century social work. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51623-7
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Graham, M. (Eds.). (2016). Social work in a diverse society: Transformatory practice with black and minority ethnic individuals and communities. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Mikola, M. (2018). From multiculturalism to superdiversity? Narratives of health and wellbeing in an urban neighbourhood. Social Work and Policy Studies: Social Justice, Practice and Theory, 1(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Withaeckx, S., Schrooten, M., & Geldof, M. (2017). Thinking and acting globally and locally: Developing transnational social work practices in Belgium. Transnational Social Review, 7(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2017.1317198
   Google Scholar