References

• Aurich, P. (2011). Activating the unemployed directions and divisions in Europe. European Journal of Social Security, 13(3), 294–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271101300301
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
   Google Scholar
• Dall, T. (2018). Social work professionals’ management of institutional and professional responsibilities at the micro-level of welfare-to-work. European Journal of Social Work, 23(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1476330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall, T., & Danneris, S. (2019). Reconsidering ‘what works’ in welfare-to-work with the vulnerable unemployed: The potential of relational causality as an alternative approach. Social Policy & Society, 18(4), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746419000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneris, S. (2018). Ready to work (yet)? unemployment trajectories among vulnerable welfare recipients. Qualitative Social Work, 17(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016672916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneris, S., & Caswell, D. (2019). Exploring the ingredients of success: Studying trajectories of the vulnerable unemployed who have entered work or education in Denmark. Social Policy and Society, 18(4), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746419000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneris, S., & Herup Nielsen, M. (2018). Bringing the client back in: A comparison between political rationality and the experiences of the unemployed. Social Policy & Administration, 52(7), 1441–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, H., & Taylor-Gooby, P. (1993). Dependency culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J. L., Ferlie, E., & van Gestel, N. (2015). Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P., & Wright, S. (2014). Universal credit, ubiquitous conditionality and its implications for social citizenship. The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 22(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982714X13875305151043
   Google Scholar
• Finn, P. (2021). Navigating indifference: Irish jobseekers’ experiences of welfare conditionality. Administration, 69(2), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2021-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D. R., & Wright, S. (2018). A hand up or a slap down? Criminalising Benefit Claimants in Britain via Strategies of Surveillance, Sanctions and Deterrence. Critical Social Policy, 38(2), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317726622
   Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T. A., & Klemsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. C., & Natland, S. (2017). The working relationship between social worker and service user in an activation policy context. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2016.1221850
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. S., & Nielsen, M. H. (2021). Working less, not more in a workfare programme: Group solidarity, informal norms and alternative value systems amongst activated participants. Journal of Social Policy, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. P. (2017). Trying the unemployed: Justification and critique, emancipation and coercion towards the ‘active society.’ Copenhagen Business School (CBS).
   Google Scholar
• Kampen, T., & Tonkens, E. (2019). A personalised approach in activation. Workfare volunteers’. experiences with Activation Practitioners. European Journal of Social Work, 22(6), 1038–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1461069
   Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organisational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organisational institutionalism (Vol. 840, pp. 243–275). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A., & Dejgaard, T. E. (2013). The institutional logic of images of the poor and welfare recipients: A comparative study of British, Swedish and Danish newspapers. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928713480068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, F., & Andersen, N. (2018). Beskæftigelse for alle? Den kommunale beskæftigelsespolitik på kontanthjælpsområdet siden 2000 [ ]. Frydenlund Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, F., & Caswell, D. (2022). Co-creation in an era of welfare conditionality lessons from Denmark. Journal of Social Policy, 51(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leseth, A. B., Vilhena, S., & Gjersøe, H. M. (2020). Aktivitetspliktens innside og utside: Unge mottakere av sosialhjelp og deres erfaringer med aktivitetsplikt [ ]. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 23(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.0809-2052-2020-02-04
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2004). Poverty (Vol. 5). Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2015). To count for nothing’: Poverty beyond the statistics. Journal of the British Academy, 3(0), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/003.139
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., & Moreira, A. (2014). Activation or workfare? Governance and the neo-liberal convergence. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (2001). ‘An offer you can’t refuse’: Workfare in international perspective. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, MØ, & Stensöta, H. O. (2019). Welfare state regimes and caseworkers’ problem explanation. Administration & Society, 51(9), 1425–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717700224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. O., Danneris, S., & Monrad, M. (2021). Waiting and temporal control: The temporal experience of long-term unemployment. Time & Society, 30(2), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X20987748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. H. (2019). Optimismens politik: Om skabelsen af uværdigt trængende borgere [ ]. Frydenlund Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. H. (2021). Money, competences or behaviour? On the Many Worths of the Unemployed. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 8(2), 124–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2020.1860785
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U. (2016). The street-level delivery of activation policies: Constraints and possibilities for a practice of citizenship. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3–4), 420–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1137869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, R. (2014). Working on welfare: Findings from a qualitative longitudinal study into the lived experiences of welfare reform in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 43(4), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, R. (2017). For whose benefit? The everyday realities of welfare reform. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pultz, S. (2018). Shame and passion: The affective governing of young unemployed people. Theory & Psychology, 28(3), 358–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318759608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pultz, S., Hansen, M. P., & Jepsen, H. (2021). Planning for a job: The trying experience of unemployment during the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 1(10), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1027/2157-3891/a000028
   Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, P., & Dierckx, D. (2013). To work or not to work? The role of the organisational context for social workers’ perceptions on activation. British Journal of Social Work, 43(6), 1170–1189. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosholm, M., Sørensen, K. L., & Skipper, L. (2017). Sagsbehandlerens betydning for udsatte borgeres jobchancer [ ]. Beskæftigelses Indikator Projektet. Væksthusets Forskningscenter.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, T., & MacDonald, R. (2013). Poverty talk: How people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame ‘the poor’. The Sociological Review, 61(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sønderskov, M., Rønning, R., & Magnussen, S. (2021). Hybrid stimulations and perversions in public service innovation. Public Policy and Administration, 37(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767211015015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trappenburg, M., Kampen, T., & Tonkens, E. (2022). Street-Level bureaucrats in a catch-all bureaucracy. Administration & Society, 54(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221104679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P., & Larsen, F. (2017). Frontline delivery of welfare-to-work policies in Europe: Activating the unemployed. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, R., & van der Aa, P. (2012). Activation work: Policy programme administration or professional service provision? Journal of Social Policy, 41(3), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279412000062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VIVE. (2022). Borgeroplevelser af Jobcenter København 2021. The Danish Center for Social Science Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., Fletcher, D. R., & Stewart, A. B. (2020). Punitive benefit sanctions, welfare conditionality, and the social abuse of unemployed people in Britain: Transforming claimants into offenders? Social Policy & Administration, 54(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., & Patrick, R. (2019). Welfare conditionality in lived experience: Aggregating qualitative longitudinal research. Social Policy and Society, 18(4), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746419000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacka, B. (2018). When the state meets the street. Public service and moral agency. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar