Breaking the deadlock: defining the quality of social work in the Czech Republic through social work research

References

• Alvarez, A. R., & Gutiérrez, L. M. (2001). Choosing to do participatory research: An example and issues of fit to consider. Journal of Community Practice, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v09n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum: Qualitativesocial Research/Sozialforschung, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian, A. (2003). An introduction to quality assurance in health care. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ek Österberg, E., & De Fine Licht, J. (2023). Beyond auditor and auditee: Exploring the governance of performance in eldercare. Public Management Review, 25(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, N. (2020). Considering a participatory approach to social work – Service user research. Qualitative Social Work, 19(5-6), 1078–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019894636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlíková, J., Hubíková, O., Trbola, R. & Musil, L. (2021). Kvalita výkonu sociální práce očima sociálních pracovníků [The quality of social work in the eyes of social workers]. Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs. https://katalog.vupsv.cz/Fulltext/vz_490.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hubíková, O., Havlíková, J., & Trbola, R. (2021a). Cíle sociální práce v kontextu jejího slabého ukotvení [Social work goals in the context of their weak institutional anchoring]. Sociální práce / Sociálna práca, 21(5), 5–21. https://socialniprace.cz/en/article/social-work-goals-in-the-context-of-their-weak-institutional-anchoring/
   Google Scholar
• Hubíková, O., Havlíková, J., Trbola, R. & Musil, L. (2021b). Deficity ukotvení české sociální práce [Deficits of anchoring Czech social work]. Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs. https://katalog.vupsv.cz/fulltext/vz_489.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hůle, D. (2015). Komora jen zvýší skupinové sobectví v sociální práci (komentář) [The chamber will only increase group selfishness in social work (comment)]. Sociální práce/Sociálna práca, 15(1). https://socialniprace.cz/online-clanky/komora-jen-zvysi-skupinove-sobectvi-v-socialni-praci/
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, P. (2021). Důsledky neoliberalizace pro sociální práci [The consequences of neoliberalisation for social work]. Sociální práce / Sociálna práca, 21(3), 89–106. https://socialniprace.cz/en/article/the-consequences-of-neoliberalisation-for-social-work/
   Google Scholar
• Liljegren, A. (2012). Pragmatic professionalism: Micro-level discourse in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 15(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.543888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. A., Fargion, S., Nothdurfter, U., Nagy, A., Berger, E., Rainer, S., & Frei, S. (2020). Negotiating quality for social work: A participatory research project in south tyrol. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(5), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731519897309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, M. & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3). https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335/553
   Google Scholar
• Merchel, J. (2013). Qualitätsmanagement in der sozialen Arbeit: eine Einführung [Quality management in social work: An introduction]. Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2004). The impact of audit on social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34(8), 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musil, L. (2013). Challenges of postmodern institutionalization for education in social work. In T. Matulayová & L. Musil (Eds.), Social work, education and postmodernity. Theory and studies in selected Czech, Slovak and Polish issues (pp. 10–72). Technical University of Liberec.
   Google Scholar
• Nekola, M., & Veselý, A. (2007). Sběr a analýza dat [Data collection and analysis]. In A. Veselý & M. Nekola (Eds.), Analýza a tvorba veřejných politik: přístupy, metody a praxe (pp. 157–190). Sociologické nakladatelství.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, K. (2010). An examination of questionnaire evaluation by expert reviewers. Field Methods, 22(4), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10379795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otevřený dopis tří organizací sdružujících sociální pracovníky: Komoru potřebujeme a chceme [An open letter from three organizations associating social workers: We need and want the Chamber]. (2015). Sociální práce/Sociálna práca, 15(1). https://socialniprace.cz/online-clanky/otevreny-dopis-tri-organizaci-sdruzujicich-socialni-pracovniky-komoru-potrebujeme-a-chceme/
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2021). Modelling the micro-foundations of the audit society: Organizations and the logic of the audit trail. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. (2005). The professionalisation of social work in the UK: Independence, prescription and regulation. Portularia, 5(1), 77–92. http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10272/244/b15179655.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098
   Google Scholar
• Timor-Shlevin, S., & Benjamin, O. (2021). The tension between managerial and critical professional discourses in social work. Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 951–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320949359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L. M., & Jacquez, F. (2020). Participatory research methods – Choice points in the research process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., & Welbourne, P. (2008). The professionalisation of social work: A cross-national exploration. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(4), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. B., Schechter, S., & Whitaker, K. (1999). A comparison of cognitive interviewing, expert review, and behavior coding: What do they tell us? [Paper presentation] Joint Statistical Meetings, Baltimore, MD, Proceedings of Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association (pp. 28–37). American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar