References

• Adams, R. (2017). Empowerment, participation and social work. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2001). Service users, social policy and the future of welfare. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830102100404
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2010). Public partnerships, governance and user involvement: A service user perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(5), 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00905.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2001). Service users’ knowledges and the social construction of social work. Journal of Social Work, 1(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/146801730100100304
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., & Davis, G. (2002). Mapping public participation in policy choices. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg, H., Kroll, C., Campbell, J., Donnelly, H., Havrdová, Z., Hradcová, D., Machado, I., Melo, S., Lorenz, W., Povolná, P., Reis, J. A., Roets, G., Roose, R., & Van Beveren, L. (2022). A framework for analysing and reflecting on modes of user participation in social work in a comparative perspective: Conclusions based on analyses of scientific journal articles from the countries participating in the ERASMUS+ INORP-project.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, K., Roets, G., & Roose, R. (2019). Raising a critical consciousness in the struggle against poverty: Breaking a culture of silence. Critical Social Policy, 39(3), 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018318820233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (2009). The concept of critical reflection: Promises and contradictions. European Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450902945215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. (2005). What do buzzwords do for development policy? A critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction’. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1043–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500235603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, S., & Beresford, P. (1992). The politics of participation. Critical Social Policy, 12(35), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839201203502
   Google Scholar
• D'Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, R. (2017). Beyond radicalism and resignation: The competing logics for public participation in policy decisions. Policy & Politics, 45(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14531466517034. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/103989/1/casepaper184.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degerickx, H., Van Beveren, L., Debaene, R., Van Gorp, A., Roose, R., & Roets, G. (2022). Theorizing notions of the participation of people in poverty in social policymaking: Policing, politics, and subjectification. Social Policy & Administration, 56(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewanckel, L., Decoene, J., Van Beveren, L., Roose, R., & Roets, G. (2021). Dealing with risk in situations of poverty: When complexity in frontline practice becomes wallpaper for organisational policy. European Journal of Social Work, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1977253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzur, A. (2008). Democratic professionalism: Citizen participation and the reconstruction of professional ethics, identity, and practice. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dzur, A. (2019). Democratic professionals as agents of change. In A. Dzur (Ed.), Democracy inside: Participatory innovation in unlikely places (pp. 1–24). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I., & Lavalette, M. (2006). Globalization and global justice. International Social Work, 49(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872806063401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feryn, N., De Corte, J., & Roose, R. (2021). The DNA of social work as a partner in primary health care. Social Work in Public Health, 37(5), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2021.2017381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feryn, N., De Corte, J., & Roose, R. (2022). The bridging role of social work: The quest towards installing a structural approach within primary health care. European Journal of Social Work, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2077319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fook, J., White, S., & Gardner, F. (2006). Critical reflection: A review of contemporary literature and understandings. In S. White, J. Fook, & F. Gardner (Eds.), Critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 1–18). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about ‘neoliberalism’? European Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1530643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillings, B. (2000). Clinical supervision and reflective practice. In S. Burns & C. Bulman (Eds.), Reflective practice in nursing: The growth of the professional practitioner (pp. 106–121). Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, K., & Thiersch, H. (2009). The concept of the ‘lifeworld orientation’ for social work and social care. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530902923643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work
   Google Scholar
• Kallio, J., Blomberg-Kroll, H., & Kroll, C. (2021). Miksi minusta tulee sosiaalityöntekijä?: Tutkimus sosiaalityön pääaineopiskelijoiden ammatinvalintamotiiveista Suomessa. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka.
   Google Scholar
• Kessl, F. (2009). Critical reflexivity, social work, and the emerging European post-welfare states. European Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450902930746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Krumer-Nevo, M. (2005). Listening to ‘life knowledge’: A new research direction in poverty studies. International Journal of Social Welfare, 14(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-6866.2005.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (2014). Getting beyond ‘heroic agency’ in conceptualising social workers as policy actors in the twenty-first century. British Journal of Social Work, 42(6), 1022–1038. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartan, C., Byrne, J., Campbell, J., Coogan, D., Davidson, G., Hayes, D., Kirwan, G., MacDonald, M., McCaughren, S., McFadden, P., McGregor, C., Montgomery, L., Pentaraki, M., Roddy, S., Roulston, A., Shore, C., & Wilson, E. (2022). Social work students on the island of Ireland: A cross-sectional survey. Social Work Education, 41(2), 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1832060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40971349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ní Shé, É., Morton, S., Lambert, V., Ní Cheallaigh, C., Lacey, V., Dunn, E., Loughnane, C., O'Connor, J., McCann, A., Adshead, M., & Kroll, T. (2019). Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process. Health Expectations, 22(3), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N., & O'Byrne, P. (2006). Constructive social work. Standaard Uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G., Roose, R., De Bie, M., Claes, L., & Van Hove, G. (2012). Pawns or pioneers? The logic of user participation in anti-poverty policy making in public policy units in Belgium. Social Policy & Administration, 46(7), 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00847.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, R., Roets, G., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2012). Irony and social work: In search of the happy Sisyphus. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1592–1607. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, U. K. (2016). User involvement in social work and education: A matter of participation? Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 13(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2014.939382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G., & Cowden, S. (2009). The social worker as intellectual. European Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450902840689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urek, M. (2017). Unheard voices: Researching participation in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 20(6), 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1278525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beveren, L., Roets, G., Buysse, A., & Rutten, K. (2018). We all reflect, but why? A systematic review of the purposes of reflection in higher education in social and behavioural sciences. Educational Research Review, 24, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Tier, M., Hermans, K., & Potting, M. (2021). Exploring the usefulness and validity of democratic professionalism for social work practice: A cross-national qualitative case study. British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar