References

• Act No. 359/1999 Coll., on social and legal protection of children.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2016). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Social Workers. (2020). Australian Association of Social Workers code of ethics 2020 – AASW. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/1201
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2012). Ethics and values in social work (4th ed.). Houndmills Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelink, C., Knorth, E. J., López López, M., Koopmans, C., ten Berge, I. J., Witteman, C. L. M., & van Yperen, T. A. (2018). Reasons for placement decisions in a case of suspected child abuse: The role of reasoning, work experience and attitudes in decision-making. Child Abuse & Neglect, 83, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2005). Redistributing profit and loss: The new economics of the market and social welfare. Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018305057025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukhari, F., AlKetbi, R., Rashid, S., Ahmed, A., & Shakir, K. (2021). Challenges in dealing with involuntary clients. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), Article 1918856. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1918856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chui, W. H., & Ho, K. M. (2006). Working with involuntary clients: Perceptions and experiences of outreach social workers in Hong Kong. Journal of Social Work Practice, 20(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650530600776947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortis, N. (2011). Overlooked and under-served? Promoting service use and engagement among ‘hard-to-reach’ populations. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00825.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, J., & Burke, B. (2006). Anti-oppressive practice: Social care and the law. Maidenhead Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D'Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. The British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2005). Working with violence, the emotions and the psycho-social dynamics of child protection: Reflections on the Victoria Climbié case. Social Work Education, 24(7), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865710802309972
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2018). How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: The possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work. Social Work Education, 37(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1413083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaker, V. (2006). Social work as a science of doing: In the praise of a minor profession. In V. Flaker & T. Schmid (Eds.), Von der Idee zur Forschunsarbeit. Forschen in Sozialarbeit und Socialwissenschaften (pp. 55–76). BSB Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Froonjian, J., & Garnett, J. L. (2013). Reaching the hard to reach: Drawing lessons from research and practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(12), 831–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.795161
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, L., James, H., Cronin-Davis, J., Tizro, Z., Beetham, T., Hullock, A., & Raynar, A. (2017). Reflexive research with mothers and children victims of domestic violence. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glumbíková, K. (2019). The self of social workers in practice in the field social work with families in the Czech Republic. Journal of Social Work Practice, 34(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2019.1665000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glumbíková, K. (2021). Non-normative use of reflexivity in social work with families in the Czech Republic. British Journal of Social Work, 26(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12807
   Google Scholar
• Gřundělová, B., & Stanková, Z. (2019). The shadow fathers in social work with families: Barriers to whole-family working. The British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (2015). Positioning theory. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. L. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 263–276). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hingley-Jones, H., & Ruch, G. (2016). ‘Stumbling through’? Relationship-based social work practice in austere times. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2016.1215975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjörne, E., Juhila, K., & van Nijnatten, C. (2010). Negotiating dilemmas in the practices of street-level welfare work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(3), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00721.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (1986). Social workers and their practice in welfare bureaucracies. Gower.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2012). Statement of ethical principles. Retrieved September 21, 2022, from http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles/
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. A. (2013). Social workers reflect on engagement with involuntary clients. https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/198
   Google Scholar
• Janebová, R., & Truhlářová, Z. (2018). Pojetí kontroly z perspektivy klienta sociální práce [The concept of control from the perspective of the client's social work]. Kontakt, 20(1), e63–e71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Jupp, V. (2005). Issues of power in social work practice in mental health services for people from black and minority ethnic groups. Critical Social Work, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v6i1.5704
   Google Scholar
• Knausová, I. (2011). Teorie a praxe sanace rodiny v českém prostředí–kvalitativní sonda do terénní práce s ohroženou rodinou v současnosti [Theory and practice of family rehabilitation in the Czech environment – a qualitative probe into field work with an endangered family at present]. Sociální Práce / Sociálna Práca, 11(1), 68–73.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2004). Research as an element in social work’s ongoing search for identity. In B. Jordan, N. Parton, R. Lovelock, K. Lyons, & J. Powel (Eds.), Reflecting on social work: Discipline and profession (pp. 145–162). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Maeseele, T., Bouverne-De Bie, M., & Roose, R. (2013). On the frontline or on the side-line? Homelessness care and care avoiders. European Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.732932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milchman, A., & Rosenberg, A. (2010). Michel Foucault: The government of self and others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miley, K. K., O’Melia, M., & DuBois, B. (2011). Generalist social work practice: An empowering approach. Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report, a child-centred system. Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Musil, L. (2004). Ráda bych Vám pomohla, ale: Dilemata práce s klienty v organizacích [I would like to help you, but: Dilemmas of working with clients in organizations]. Marek Zeman.
   Google Scholar
• Musil, L. (2008). Různorodost pojetí, nejasná nabídka a kontrola výkonu ‘sociální práce’ [Diversity of concepts, unclear supply and control of ‘social work’]. Sociální Práce / Sociálna Práca, 8(2), 60–79.
   Google Scholar
• Naert, J., Roets, G., Roose, R., & Vanderplasschen, W. (2019). Fight, freeze or flee: Exploring youngsters’ strategies in dealing with youth care interventions. Qualitative Social Work, 19(5–6), 1147–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019882078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (2005). The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral experience. In D. K. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 140–165). University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navrátil, P. (2014). Reflexivní posouzení v sociální práci s rodinami [Reflective assessment in social work with families]. Masarykova univerzita.
   Google Scholar
• Plháková, A. (2005). Učebnice obecné psychologie [Textbook of general psychology]. Academia.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2011). Research methods for social work. Brooks/Cole Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Saario, S., Hall, C., & Lydahl, D. (2021). Engaging with hard-to-reach clients: Towards the last resort response by welfare workers. Social Inclusion, 9(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i3.4315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenius-Ayoade, A. (2019). Housing, health and service use of the homeless in Helsinki, Finland [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Helsingin yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, C., & Ward, T. (2013). Involuntary clients, pro-social modelling and ethics. Ethics and Social Welfare, 7(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2012.666753
   Google Scholar
• van Hal, L., Meershoek, A., Nijhuis, F.,& Horstman, K. (2013). A sociological perspective on “the unmotivated client”: Public accountability and professional work methods in vocational rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(10), 809–818. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.709303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar