References

• Askeland, G. A., & Fook, J. (2009). Critical reflection in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450903100851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudré-Mauroux, A., Piérart, G., & Vaucher, C. (2020). Partnership with social care professionals as a context for promoting self-determination among people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 99, 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danby, S. (2021). Ways of working with video and online data: From fieldwork to analysis. In I. D. Silverman (Red.), Qualitative research (5E utg., s) (pp. 283–298). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• D’Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. The British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, S., Williams, V., Webb, J., Gall, M., & Worrall, D. (2019). Managing relational autonomy in interactions: People with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(5), 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (1986). Interpersonal process recall as a psychotherapy process research method. In I. L. S. Greenberg, & W. M. Pinsof (Red.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (s. 503–527). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., & Shapiro, D. A. (1988). Brief structured recall: A more efficient method for studying significant therapy events. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 61(Pt 2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1988.tb02773.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2018). How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: The possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work. Social Work Education, 37(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1413083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, R. S., Barns, A., Chung, D., & Fleay, C. (2022). Messiness in international qualitative interviewing: What I did, what I didn’t do, and a little bit about why. Qualitative Social Work, 21(5), 833–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211043196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (Red.). (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Herland, M. D. (2022). Emotional intelligence as a part of critical reflection in social work practice and research. Qualitative Social Work, 21(4), 662–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211024734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husabø, M., Mæhle, M., Råheim, M., & Øien, A. M. (2022). Balancing responsibility, boundaries and time: Social workers’ experiences in service user meetings – a multi-method study based on interpersonal process recall. Nordic Social Work Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2022.2092541
   Google Scholar
• Husabø, M., Mæhle, M., Råheim, M., & Øien, A. M. (2023). Persevering professionals: Dilemmas of relationships and self-determination in work with people with intellectual disability – a multi-method study based on interpersonal process recall. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295231154126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2012). Ethics in praxis: Negotiating the presence and functions of a video camera in family therapy. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612457487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janusz, B., & Peräkylä, A. (2021). Quality in conversation analysis and interpersonal process recall. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 426–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhila, K., Dall, T., Hall, C., & Koprowska, J. (Red.) (2021). Interprofessional collaboration and service users: Analysing meetings in social welfare (1. utg.). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447356653
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, N., Schauble, P., Resnikoff, A., Danish, S. J., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1969). Interpersonal process recall. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 148(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196904000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, D., Flesaker, K., & Stege, R. (2008). Qualitative interviewing using interpersonal process recall: Investigating internal experiences during professional-client conversations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700102
   Google Scholar
• Lay, K., & McGuire, L. (2010). Building a lens for critical reflection and reflexivity in social work education. Social Work Education, 29(5), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470903159125
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Hazlett, J., & Foster, V. A. (2014). Utilising Interpersonal Process Recall in Clinical Supervision to Address Counselor Countertransference. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Macaskie, J., Lees, J., & Freshwater, D. (2015). Talking about talking: Interpersonal process recall as an intersubjective approach to research. Psychodynamic Practice, 21(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2015.1042517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meekums, B., Macaskie, J., & Kapur, T. (2016). Developing skills in counselling and psychotherapy: A scoping review of interpersonal process recall and reflecting team methods in initial therapist training. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 44(5), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2016.1143550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller Scarnato, J. (2019). The value of digital video data for qualitative social work research: A narrative review. Qualitative Social Work, 18(3), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017735885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskal, A. C. M., & Wass, R. (2019). Interpersonal process recall: A novel approach to illuminating students’ software development processes. Computer Science Education, 29(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1542190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natvik, E., Lavik, K. O., Ogden, J., Strømmen, M., & Moltu, C. (2022). The patient-practitioner interaction in post bariatric surgery consultations: An interpersonal process recall study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2152876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., Onwuegbuzie, A., Wines, L., & Frels, R. (2 015). The therapeutic interview process in qualitative research studies. The Qualitative Report, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1458
   Google Scholar
• Pallisera, M., Vilà, M., Fullana, J., Díaz-Garolera, G., Puyalto, C., & Valls, M.-J. (2018). The role of professionals in promoting independent living: Perspectives of self-advocates and frontline managers. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(6)(6), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory (4th ed.). palgrave macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Probst, B. (2015). The Eye regards itself: Benefits and challenges of reflexivity in qualitative social work research. Social Work Research, 39(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svu028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å, Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher–researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11(1), 30996. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2005). Relationship-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child & Family Social Work, 10(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00359.x
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2012). Where have all the feelings gone? Developing reflective and relationship-based management in child-care social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 42(7), 1315–1332. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saario, S., Räsänen, J.-M., Raitakari, S., Banks, S., & Juhila, K. (2018). Doing ‘ethics work’ together: Negotiating service users’ independence in community mental health meetings. Ethics and Social Welfare, 12(4), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2018.1533991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (2011). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (reprinted). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenk, H. (2019). Outdoor therapy: An interpretative phenomenological analysis examining the lived-experience, embodied, and therapeutic process through interpersonal process recall. Sports, 7(8), Artikkel 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7080182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, J. (2000). Learning from personal experience: Reflexions on social work practice with mothers in child and family care. Journal of Social Work Practice, 14(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/713683883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg Kleiven, G., Hjeltnes, A., Natvik, E., & Moltu, C. (2022). Engaging with difficult topics and emotional experiences in psychotherapy: A study of helpful therapist acts. Psychotherapy Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2022.2132889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim, I. J., Gudmundsdottir, S., Husabø, M., & Øien, A. M. (2020). The importance of relationships in the encounter between NAV staff and young, vulnerable users. An action research study. European Journal of Social Work, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1783213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald, J., Gardner, F., & Long, N. (2017). Teaching critical reflection in social work field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(2), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1266978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2008). Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: A framework for practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 38(6), 1212–1237. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weele, S., & Bredewold, F. (2021). Shadowing as a qualitative research method for intellectual disability research: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1873752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, L. (2019). Reflective practice, reflexivity, and critical reflection in social work education in Australia. Australian Social Work, 72(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2018.1521856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, W., & Clark, V. (2004). Learnings from a qualitative study into counselling supervision: Listening to supervisor and supervisee. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4(2), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140412331383903
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1999). Focus groups: A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, K. (2006). Self-reflection in reflective practice: A note of caution. The British Journal of Social Work, 36(5), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar