Uneven Paths: Latin American Women Facing Italian Family Reunification Policies

References

• Åkesson, L., J. Carling, and H. Drotbohm. 2012. “Mobility, Moralities and Motherhood: Navigating the Contingencies of Cape Verdean Lives.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38: 237–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosini, M. 2001. “The Role of Immigrants in the Italian Labour Market.” International Migration 39 (3): 61–83. doi:10.1111/1468-2435.00156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and M. Ruhs 2010. “Researching Illegality and Labour Migration.” Population, Space and Place 16 (3): 175–179. doi:10.1002/psp.594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaci, S. 2008. “(Re) viewing Ethnic Residential Segregation in Southern European Cities: Housing and Urban Regimes as Mechanisms of Marginalisation.” Housing Studies 23: 589–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baizán, P., C. Beauchemin, and A. González-Ferrer. 2014. “An Origin and Destination Perspective on Family Reunification: The Case of Senegalese Couples.” European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 30 (1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassar, L., and L. Merla. 2013. Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care. Understanding Mobility and Absence in Family Life. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolani, B., M. Rinaldini, and M. Tognetti Bordogna. 2013. “Combining Civic Stratification and Transnational Approaches for Reunited Families: The Case of Moroccans, Indians and Pakistanis in Reggio Emilia.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (9): 1470–1487. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.868302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, A., N. Sigona, and R. Zetter 2011. “Migration Routes and Strategies of Young Undocumented Migrants in England: A Qualitative Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (8): 1286–1302. doi:10.1080/01419870.2011.560276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, L. 2014. “Regulating Membership Explaining Restriction and Stratification of Family Migration in Europe.” Journal of Family Issues. doi:10.1177/0192513X14557493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. 2012. “Practising Motherhood at a Distance: Retention and Loss in Ecuadorian Transnational Families.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38: 261–277. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2012.646421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonizzoni, P. 2012a. “Civic Stratification, Stratified Reproduction and Family Solidarity: Strategies of Latino Families in Milan.” In Gender, Generations and the Family in International Migration, edited by A. Kraler, M. Kohli, and C. Schmoll, 311–335. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonizzoni, P. 2012b. “Here or There? Shifting Meanings and Practices in Mother-Child Relationships across Time and Space.” International Migration. doi:10.1111/imig.12028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonizzoni, P. 2014. “Immigrant Working Mothers Reconciling Work and Childcare: The Experience of Latin American and Eastern European Women in Milan.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 21 (2): 194–217. doi:10.1093/sp/jxu008.
   Google Scholar
• Bonizzoni, P., and P. Boccagni. 2013. “Care (and) Circulation Revisited: A Conceptual Map of Diversity in Transnational Parenting.” In Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care: Understanding Mobility and Absence in Family Life, edited by L. Baldassar and L. Merla, 78–93. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bonizzoni, P., and P. Leonini. 2013. “Shifting Geographical Configurations in Migrant Families: Narratives of Children Reunited with their Mothers in Italy.” Comparative Population Studies-Zeitschrift Für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 38: 465–498.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S., and A. Kraler. 2014. “Introduction Family Migration as an Integration Issue? Policy Perspectives and Academic Insights.” Journal of Family Issues. doi:10.1177/0192513X14557490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosniak, L. 2000. “Citizenship Denationalized.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7 (2): 447–509.
   Google Scholar
• Calavita, K. 2005. “Law, Citizenship, and the Construction of (some) Immigrant “Others.” Law & Social Inquiry 30: 401–420. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2005.tb01017.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caneva, E. 2014. “Children’s Agency and Migration: Constructing Kinship in Latin American and East European Families Living in Italy.” Childhood, 0907568214521844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chant, S. 1985. “Single–Parent Families: Choice or Constraint?” Development and Change 16: 635–656. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1985.tb00227.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comune di Milano [Municipality of Milan]. 2011. La popolazione straniera a Milano: dati e analisi [The Foreign Population in Milan: Data and Analysis]. Milano: Comune di Milano, Area Innovazione, Economia e Sviluppo: Settore Statistica [Municipality of Milan, Innovation, Economics and Development Statistics]. Accessed April 20, 2015. http://allegati.comune.milano.it/Statistica/Popolazione/StranieriMilano_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coutin, S. B. 2003. Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants' Struggle for US Residency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eggebø, H. 2013. “A Real Marriage? Applying for Marriage Migration to Norway.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39: 773–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbersen, G., M. Van San, and A. Leerkes. 2006. “A Room with a View: Irregular Immigrants in the Legal Capital of the World.” Ethnography 7 (2): 209–242. doi:10.1177/1466138106067057.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M., ed. 2005. Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Finotelli, C., and G. Sciortino. 2013. “Through the Gates of the Fortress: European Visa Policies and the Limits of Immigration Control.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14 (1): 80–101. doi:10.1080/15705854.2012.732390.
   Google Scholar
• Fondazione Leone Moressa [Leone Moressa Foundation]. 2011. Rapporto annuale sull’economia dell’immigrazione [Yearly Report on the Economics of Migration]. Bologna, il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Fresnoza-Flot, A. 2014. “The Bumpy Landscape of Family Reunification: Experiences of First-and 1.5-generation Filipinos in France.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2014.956711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, S., and R. G. Gonzales. 2012. “When Do Papers Matter? An Institutional Analysis of Undocumented Life in the United States.” International Migration 50 (4): 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00726.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, L., C. Berinstein, and J. K. Bernhard. 2009. “Institutionalizing Precarious Migratory Status in Canada.” Citizenship Studies 13: 239–265. doi:10.1080/13621020902850643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, L., and P. Landolt. 2011. “Caught in the Work-citizenship Matrix: The Lasting Effects of Precarious Legal Status on Work for Toronto Immigrants.” Globalizations 8 (3): 325–341. doi:10.1080/14747731.2011.576850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, R. 2008. The Family in Question: Immigrant and Ethnic Minorities in Multicultural Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellgren, T. 2012. “At the Crossroads of Structure and Agency: Investigating the Importance of ‘Legality’ for International Migrants.” Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration 2 (1): 34–40. Accessed April 20, 2015. http://oxmofm.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/At-the-Crossroads-of-Structure-and-Agency.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huang, P. 2008. “Anchor Babies, Over-breeders, and the Population Bomb: The Reemergence of Nativism and Population Control in Anti-immigration Policies.” Harvard Law and Policy Review 2: 385.
   Google Scholar
• Isaakyan, I., and A. Triandafyllidou. 2014. “Anglophone Marriage-migrants in Southern Europe: A Study of Expat Nationalism and Integration Dynamics.” International Review of Sociology 24: 374–390. doi:10.1080/03906701.2014.954333.
   Google Scholar
• Istat [Italian Institute of National Statistics]. 2008. Gli stranieri nel mercato del lavoro [The Foreigners in the Labour Market]. Roma: Istat. Accessed April 20, 2015. http://www3.istat.it/dati/catalogo/20090109_00/stranieri_nel_mercato_lavoro.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Istat [Italian Institute of National Statistics]. 2010. La Misura Dell'economia Sommersa Secondo le Statistiche Ufficiali [The Measure of Informal Economy According to Official Estimates]. Roma: Istat. Accessed April 20, 2015. http://www3.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20100713_00/.
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, E., A. Kraler, M. Kohli, and C. Schmoll. 2011. “Introduction: Issues and Debates on Family-related Migration and the Migrant Family: A European Perspective.” In Gender, Generations and the Family in International Migration, edited by Kraler, A., E. Kofman, M. Kohli, and C. Schmoll, 11–52. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraler, A. 2010. Civic Stratification, Gender and Family Migration Policies in Europe. Vienna: International Centre for Migration Policy Development. Accessed February 2, 2015. http://research.icmpd.org/1445.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kraler, A. 2014. “A Liberal Paradox: Expanding Rights, Reducing Access? Contemporary Patterns of Family Migration Policies in the EU.” In Migration, Familie und Gesellschaft [Migration, Family and Society], edited by Geisen, T., T. Studer, and E. Yildiz, 357–378. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kubal, A. 2013. “Conceptualizing Semi-legality in Migration Research.” Law & Society Review 47: 555–587. doi:10.1111/lasr.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leerkes, A., and I. Kulu-Glasgow. 2011. “Playing Hard (er) to Get-The State, International Couples, and the Income Requirement.” European Journal of Migration and Law 13 (1): 95–121. doi:10.1163/157181611X554267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, V., and D. Schans. 2011. “Transnational Families and the Well-being of Children: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges.” Journal of Marriage and Family 73: 704–712. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00840.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menjivar, C. 2006. “Liminal Legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan Immigrants' Lives in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 111 (4): 999–1037. doi:0002-9602/2006/11104-0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, L. 2002. Managing Migration: Civic Stratification and Migrants’ Rights. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. International Migration Outlook. Accessed April 20, 2015. http://www.oecd.com.
   Google Scholar
• Pascouau, Y., and H. Labayle. 2011. Conditions for Family Reunification under Strain. A Comparative Study in Nine EU Member States. Brussels: King Baudouin Foundation, European Policy Centre and Odysseus Network. http://www.Epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_1369_conditionsforfamily.Pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rollins, J. 1987. Between Women: Domestics and their Employers. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffer, G. B. 2011. “Pushed beyond Recognition? The Liberality of Family Reunification Policies in the EU.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37: 935–951. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2011.576196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytter, M. 2012. “Semi-legal Family Life: Pakistani Couples in the Borderlands of Denmark and Sweden.” Global Networks 12 (1): 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2011.00325.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, G. 2011. “Law and Identity: Transnational Arranged Marriages and the Boundaries of Danishness.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37: 257–275. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2011.521339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, R. 2014. A Stratified Right to Family Life? Patterns and Rationales behind Differential Access to Family Reunification for Third-country Nationals Living within the EU. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/migration/documents/mwp70.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, E., A. Kraler, S. Bonjour, and V. Bilger. 2009. “Doing Family: Responses to the Constructions of [`] the Migrant Family’ across Europe.” The History of the Family 14 (2): 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.hisfam.2009.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strik, T., B. de Hart, and E. Nissen. 2013. Family Reunification: A Barrier or Facilitator of Integration. Country Report of the Netherlands. Family Reunification Project. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Therborn, G. 2004. Between Sex and Power: Family in the world 1900-2000. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanek, D. 2012. “Forced Marriage vs. Family Reunification: Nationality, Gender and Ethnicity in German Migration Policy.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 33: 333–345. doi:10.1080/07256868.2012.673475.
   Google Scholar
• Van Walsum, S. 2008. The Family and the Nation. Dutch Family Migration Policies in the Context of Changing Family Norms. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. 2014. “Transnational Civil Dis/obedience” in the Danish Family Unification Dispute.” European Political Science Review 7 (1): 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, H. 2009. “Moulding the Migrant Family.” Legal Studies 29: 592–618. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2009.00132.x.
   Google Scholar