Detention and its discontents: punishment and compliance within the U.K. detention estate through the lens of the withdrawal of Assisted Voluntary Return

References

• Aliverti, Ana. 2012. “Making People Criminal: The Role of the Criminal Law in Immigration Enforcement.” Theoretical Criminology 16 (4): 417–434. doi.org/10.1177/1362480612449779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG). 2015. The Report of the Inquiry into the Use of Immigration Detention in the United Kingdom: A Joint Inquiry by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees and the AllParty Parliamentary Group on Migration. London: APPG. https://detentioninquiry.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/immigration-detention-inquiry-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Bridget. 2008. “Illegal Immigrant: Victim or Villain?” COMPAS Working Paper WP-08-64. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/media/WP-2008-064-Anderson_Illegal_Immigrant_Victim_Villain.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Ruben. 2014. “Time and the Migrant Other: European Border Controls and the Temporal Economics of Illegality.” American Anthropologist 116 (4): 795–809. doi.org/10.1111/aman.12148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrijasevic, Rutvica, and William Walters. 2010. “The International Organization for Migration and the International Government of Borders.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (6): 977–999. doi.org/10.1068/d1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashutosh, Ishan, and Alison Mountz. 2011. “Migration Management for the Benefit of Whom? Interrogating the Work of the International Organization for Migration.” Citizenship Studies 15 (1): 21–38. doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2011.534914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, Carol. 2009. Analysing Policy. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Higher Education AU.
   Google Scholar
• Back, Les. 2007. The Art of Listening. Oxford: Berg. http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-art-of-listening-9781845201210/.
   Google Scholar
• Bhui, Hindpal Singh. 2013. “Humanising Immigration Control and Detention.” In The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Robert, Michael Collyer, and Will Somerville. 2011. Pay to Go Schemes and Other Non-Coercive Return Programmes: Is Scale Possible? Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. zotero://attachment/849/.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Richard, Khalid Koser, Karen Munk, Gaby Atfield, Lisa D’Onofrio, and Richmond Tiemoko. 2004. Understanding Voluntary Return. 50/04. London: Home Office. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110220105210/rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr5004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, Alice, and Liza Schuster. 2005. “At the Extremes of Exclusion: Deportation, Detention and Dispersal.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (3): 491–512. doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000337858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Mary. 2012. “Subjectivity and Identity in Detention: Punishment and Society in a Global Age.” Theoretical Criminology 16 (2): 123–140. doi.org/10.1177/1362480612441116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Mary. 2013. “Can Immigration Detention Centres Be Legitimate? Understanding Confinement in a Global World.” In The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion, edited by Katja Franko Aas and Mary Bosworth, 149–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Mary. 2014. Inside Immigration Detention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Mary. 2016. Staff, Race, and Power in Detention. Border Criminologies (blog). October 28. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2016/10/%E2%80%98-place-makes-you.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Mary, and Blerina Kellezi. 2016. “Getting In, Getting Out and Getting Back: Conducting Long-Term Research in Immigration Detention Centres.” In Reflexivity and Criminal Justice: Intersections of Policy, Practice and Research. 1st ed., 2016 ed., edited by Sarah Armstrong, Jarrett Blaustein, and Alistair Henry, 237–262. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Mary, and Blerina Kellezi. 2017. “Doing Research in Immigration Removal Centres: Ethics, Emotions and Impact.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 17 (2): 121–137. doi.org/10.1177/1748895816646151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Mary, and Marion Vannier. 2016. “Comparing Immigration Detention in Britain and France: A Matter of Time?” European Journal of Migration and Law 18 (2): 157–176. doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Language and Symbolic Power. New ed.Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campesi, G. 2015. “Hindering the Deportation Machine: An Ethnography of Power and Resistance in Immigration Detention.” Punishment & Society 17 (4): 427–453. doi:10.1177/1462474515603804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrabine, Eamonn. 2011. “The Iconography of Punishment: Execution Prints and the Death Penalty.” The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 50 (5): 452–464. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2011.00688.x.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet M., and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed.Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, Heaven, Joanne Hemmings, and Neil Price. 2011. Coping with Destitution: Survival and Livelihood Strategies of Refused Asylum Seekers. Oxford: Oxfam. http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/coping-with-destitution-survival-and-livelihood-strategies-of-refused-asylum-se-121667.
   Google Scholar
• de Genova, Nicholas P. 2002. “Migrant ‘Illegality’ and Deportability in Everyday Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (1): 419–447. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dench, Janet, and François Crépeau. 2003. “Introduction: Interdiction at the Expense of Human Rights: A Long-Term Containment Strategy.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1550823
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark. 2006. “Racism, Migration and Development: The Foundations of Planetary Order.” Progress in Development Studies 6 (1): 68–79. doi.org/10.1191/1464993406ps128oa.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, Peter. 2004. “Creeping Conditionality in the UK: From Welfare Rights to Conditional Entitlements?” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 29 (2): 265–287. doi: 10.1353/cjs.2004.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Migration Network (EMN). 2011. Programmes and Strategies in the EU Member States Fostering Assisted Return to and Reintegration in Third Countries: EMN Synthesis Report. European Migration Network. http://emn.ie/cat_publication_detail.jsp?clog=1&itemID=308&t=6.
   Google Scholar
• Fekete, Liz. 2003. Death at the Border – Who Is to Blame? Institute of Race Relations. 44. http://www.irr.org.uk/news/death-at-the-border-who-is-to-blame/.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, Nigel G., and Jane L. Fielding. 2000. “Resistance and Adaptation to Criminal Identity: Using Secondary Analysis to Evaluate Classic Studies of Crime and Deviance.” Sociology 34 (4): 671–689. doi.org/10.1177/S0038038500000419.
   Google Scholar
• Flint, John. 2009. “Governing Marginalised Populations: The Role of Coercion, Support and Agency.” European Journal of Homelessness Volume. http://feantsaresearch.org/IMG/pdf/feantsa-ejh2009-thinkpiece-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Lyn. 2016. “Songs from the Detention Centre: The Drama Set on Immigration’s Frontline.” The Guardian, November 9, sec. Stage. http://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/nov/09/songs-from-the-detention-centre-removal-men-the-yard-hackney
   Google Scholar
• Garland, David. 1996. “The Limits of the Sovereign State Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society.” The British Journal of Criminology 36 (4): 445–471. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, David. 2010. Peculiar Institution: America’s Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition. Oxford: OUP/Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, Matthew J. 2008. “Asylum and the Expansion of Deportation in the United Kingdom1.” Government and Opposition 43 (2): 146–167. doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00249.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibney, Matthew J., and Randall Hansen. 2003. Deportation and the Liberal State: The Forcible Return of Asylum Seekers and Unlawful Migrants in Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom. New Issues in Refugee Research. Working paper n. 77. http://www.unhcr.org/research/working/3e59de764/deportation-liberal-state-forcible-return-asylum-seekers-unlawful-migrants.html.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 2009. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Melanie. 2013. “Living with Uncertainty: Indefinite Immigration Detention.” Journal of Legal Anthropology 1 (3): 263–286. doi: 10.3167/jla.2013.010301
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Melanie B. E. 2014. “Out of Time: The Temporal Uncertainties of Refused Asylum Seekers and Immigration Detainees.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (12): 1991–2009. doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.907737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Alexandra. 2010. “‘These People Could Be Anyone’: Fear, Contempt (and Empathy) in a British Immigration Removal Centre.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (6): 881–898. doi.org/10.1080/13691831003643330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Alexandra. 2012. Border Watch: Cultures of Immigration, Detention and Control. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, Martyn. 2010. “Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues.” Sociological Research Online 15 (1). doi.org/10.5153/sro.2076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, Jo, and Demelza Jones. 2011. “A Tale of Two Analyses: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data.” Sociological Research Online 17 (2): 1–9. doi: 10.5153/sro.2523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, Immy, and Les Todres. 2003. “The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistency and Coherence.” Qualitative Research 3 (3): 345–357. doi.org/10.1177/1468794103033004.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi, S. 2009. “Sweden: Detention and Deportation of Asylum Seekers.” Race & Class 50 (4): 38–56. doi:10.1177/0306396809102996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, Anne. 2014. “The Politics and Discourse of Migrant Return: The Role of UNHCR and IOM in the Governance of Return.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (6): 905–923. doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.855073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leerkes, Arjen, and Dennis Broeders. 2010. “A Case of Mixed Motives?: Formal and Informal Functions of Administrative Immigration Detention.” The British Journal of Criminology 50 (5): 830–850. doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lucht, Hans. 2011. Darkness Before Daybreak: African Migrants Living on the Margins in Southern Italy Today. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malkki, Liisa H. 1995. “Refugees and Exile: From ‘Refugee Studies’ to the National Order of Things.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1): 495–523. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Jennifer. 2007. “‘Re-Using’ Qualitative Data: On the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology.” Text. Article. May 30. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/3.html.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, Derek, Claire Bennett, and Sarah Walker. 2016. “The Combination of ‘Insider’ and ‘Outsider’ Strategies in VSO–Government Partnerships: The Relationship Between Refugee Action and the Home Office in the UK.” Voluntary Sector Review 7 (1): 27–46. doi.org/10.1332/204080516X14555434070880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Niamh. 2007. “(Re)Using Qualitative Data?” Sociological Research Online 12 (3). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/1.html. doi: 10.5153/sro.1496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai, Mae M. 2005. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Updated edition with a New Foreword edition.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I. 2004. Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, Odette, and Natasha S. Mauthner. 2004. “Whose Data Are They Anyway? Practical, Legal and Ethical Issues in Archiving Qualitative Research Data.” Sociology 38 (1): 139–152. doi.org/10.1177/0038038504039366.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., and M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Megan. 2013. “Social Policy, ‘Deservingness,’ and Sociotemporal Marginalization: Katrina Survivors and FEMA.” Sociological Forum 28 (4): 742–763. doi.org/10.1111/socf.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayad, Abdelmalek. 2004. The Suffering of the Immigrant. Translated by David Macey. 1st ed.Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, Elizabeth B. 2007. What’s [Yet] to Be Seen? Re-Using Qualitative Data. Text. Article. May 30. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/4.html.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, Stephanie J., and Hajela Ruchi. 2015. “Immigration Detention in the UK.” Migration Observatory Briefing, COMPAS, University of Oxford, http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Briefing-Immigration_Detention.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stumpf, Juliet. 2013. “The Process Is the Punishment in Crimmigation Law.” In The Borders of Punishment: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion, edited by Mary Bosworth, and Katja Franko Aas, 58–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, Imogen. 2013. Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ugelvik, Thomas. 2016. “Techniques of Legitimation: The Narrative Construction of Legitimacy among Immigration Detention Officers.” Crime, Media, Culture 12 (2): 215–232. doi.org/10.1177/1741659016648180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, Loïc. 1999. “‘Suitable Enemies’: Foreigners and Immigrants in the Prisons of Europe.” Punishment & Society 1 (2): 215–222. doi.org/10.1177/14624749922227784.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, Loïc. 2010. “Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare, and Social Insecurity1.” Sociological Forum 25 (2): 197–220. doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01173.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, William. 2004. “Secure Borders, Safe Haven, Domopolitics.” Citizenship Studies 8 (3): 237–260. doi.org/10.1080/1362102042000256989.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, Charles. 2007. “Refugees at Europe’s Borders: The Moral Economy of Care.” Transcultural Psychiatry 44 (3): 394–417. doi.org/10.1177/1363461507081638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watters, Charles, and Didier Fassin. 2001. “Avenues of Access and the Moral Economy of Legitimacy.” Anthropology Today 17 (2): 22–23. doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.00051.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, Frances. 2006. European Race Bulletin 55. Institute of Race Relations. http://www.irr.org.uk/publications/issues/from-deterrence-to-criminalisation/.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Leanne. 2002. “The Detention of Asylum Seekers: 20 Reasons Why Criminologists Should Care.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 14: 9. doi: 10.1080/10345329.2002.12036244
   Google Scholar
• Wilsher, Daniel. 2011. Immigration Detention: Law, History, Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar