Assessments of citizenship criteria: are immigrants more liberal?

References

• Angrist, J. A., and J.-S. Pischke. 2015. Mastering ‘Metrics: The Path From Cause to Effect. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banting, K., and W. Kymlicka. 2017a. “Introduction: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies.” In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, edited by K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, 1–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banting, K., and W. Kymlicka. 2017b. The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. 2017. “Citizenship and Collective Identities as Political Sources of Solidarity in the European Union.” In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, edited by K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, 80–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R., I. Honohan, T. Huddleston, D. Hutcheson, J. Shaw, and M. Vink. 2013. Access to Citizenship and Its Impact on Immigrant Integration: European Summary and Standards. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Birkvad, S. R. 2019. “Immigrant Meanings of Citizenship: Mobility, Stability, and Recognition.” Citizenship Studies 23: 798–814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1664402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloemraad, I. 2017. “Solidarity and Conflict: Understanding the Causes and Consequences of Access to Citizenship, Civic Integration Policies, and Multiculturalism.” In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, edited by K. Banting, and W. Kymlicka, 327–363. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borevi, K., K. K. Jensen, and P. Mouritsen. 2017. “The Civic Turn of Immigrant Integration Policies in the Scandinavian Welfare States.” Comparative Migration Studies 5 (1): 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-017-0052-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brochmann, G. 2013. Country Report: Norway. EUDO Citizenship Observatory. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brochmann, G., and A. Hagelund. 2011. “Migrants in the Scandinavian Welfare State: The Emergence of a Social Policy Problem.” Nordic Journal of Migration Research 1 (1): 13–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/v10202-011-0003-3.
   Google Scholar
• Brochmann, G., and A. Hagelund. 2012. Immigration Policy and the Scandinavian Welfare State, 1945-2010. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Careja, R., and P. Bevelander. 2018. “Using Population Registers for Migration and Integration Research: Examples From Denmark and Sweden.” Comparative Migration Studies 6 (1): 19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0076-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung, J., and G. S. Monroe. 2003. “Exploring Social Desirability Bias.” Journal of Business Ethics 44: 291–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023648703356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deli Carpini, M. X., and S. Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., and H. M. Winklhofer. 2001. “Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development.” Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2): 269–277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S. I., and E. J. Grant-Vallone. 2002. “Understanding Self-Report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research.” Journal of Business and Psychology 17 (2): 245–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019637632584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdal, M. B. 2019. “Negotiation Dynamics and Their Limits: Young People in Norway Deal with Diversity in the Nation.” Political Geography 73: 38–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdal, M. B., E. M. Doeland, and E. Tellander. 2018. “How Citizenship Matters (or not): the Citizenship–Belonging Nexus Explored among Residents in Oslo, Norway.” Citizenship Studies 22 (7): 705–724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1508415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. W. 2014. Immigration and Membership Politics in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagelund, A., and K. Reegård. 2011. “‘Changing Teams’: a Participant Perspective on Citizenship Ceremonies.” Citizenship Studies 15 (6-7): 735–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2011.600087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpaz, Y. 2015. “Ancestry Into Opportunity: How Global Inequality Drives Demand for Long-Distance European Union Citizenship.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (13): 2081–2104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1037258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpaz, Y. 2019a. Citizenship 2.0: Dual Nationality as a Global Asset. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harpaz, Y. 2019b. “Compensatory Citizenship: Dual Nationality as a Strategy of Global Upward Mobility.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (6): 897–916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1440486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpaz, Y., and P. Mateos. 2019. “Strategic Citizenship: Negotiating Membership in the age of Dual Nationality.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (6): 843–857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1440482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers, K., I. Honohan, and R. Bauböck. 2017. How to Measure the Purposes of Citizenship Laws: Explanatory Report for the CITLAW Indicators. Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute. http://globalcit.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/CITLAW_3.0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. K., C. Fernández, and G. Brochmann. 2017. “Nationhood and Scandinavian Naturalization Politics: Varieties of the Civic Turn.” Citizenship Studies 21 (5): 606–624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2017.1330399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. K., P. Mouritsen, E. C. Bech, and T. V. Olsen. 2019. “Roadblocks to Citizenship: Selection Effects of Restrictive Naturalisation Rules.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1667757.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 2007. “Transformation of Immigrant Integration: Civic Integration and Antidiscrimination in the Netherlands, France, and Germany.” World Politics 59 (2): 243–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2007.0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 2017. “Civic Integration in Western Europe: Three Debates.” West European Politics 40 (6): 1153–1176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1303252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 2019. “The Instrumental Turn of Citizenship.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (6): 858–878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1440484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochenov, D., and J. Lindeboom. 2019. Kälin and Kochenov’s Quality of Nationality Index: Nationalities of the World in 2018. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 2019. “The Ethics of Membership in Multicultural Societies.” Paper presented at the closing conference of the GOVCIT project, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbøen, A. H. 2015. “Citizenship, Integration and the Quest for Social Cohesion: Nationality Reform in the Scandinavian Countries.” Comparative Migration Studies 3 (3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40878-015-0002-y.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbøen, A. H. 2019. “Dual Citizenship in an Era of Securitisation: The Case of Denmark.” Nordic Journal of Migration Research 9 (3): 293–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2019-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbøen, A. H., S. R. Birkvad, and M. B. Erdal. 2018. Citizenship in the Nordic Countries: Past, Present, Future. Copenhagen: The Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Moret, J. 2017. “Mobility Capital: Somali Migrants’ Trajectories of (im) Mobilities and the Negotiation of Social Inequalities Across Borders.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, P. 2013. “The Resilience of Citizenship Traditions: Civic Integration in Germany, Great Britain and Denmark.” Ethnicities 13 (1): 86–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812451220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, P., K. K. Jensen, and S. J. Larin. 2019. “Introduction: Theorizing the Civic Turn in European Integration Policies.” Ethnicities 19 (4): 595–613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796819843532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, P., and T. V. Olsen. 2013. “Denmark Between Liberalism and Nationalism.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (4): 691–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.598233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumbaut, R. G. 2004. “Ages, Life Stages, and Generational Cohorts: Decomposing the Immigrant First and Second Generations in the United States.” 38 (3): 1160–1205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00232.x.
   Google Scholar
• Shachar, A. 2009. The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, J. H., and M. W. Watson. 2015. Introduction to Econometrics (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Vink, M. P., T. Prokic-Breuer, and J. Dronkers. 2013. “Immigrant Naturalization in the Context of Institutional Diversity: Policy Matters, but to Whom?” International Migration 51 (5): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J., and S. Feldman. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions Versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 579–616. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2111583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar