Defining and transforming local migration policies: a conceptual approach backed by evidence from Germany

References

• Agustín, Ó.G., and M. B. Jørgensen. 2019. “Solidarity Cities and Cosmopolitanism from Below: Barcelona as a Refugee City.” Social Inclusion 7 (2): 198–207. doi:10.17645/si.v7i2.2063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahad, Aliyya, and Natalia Banulescu-Bogdan. 2019. Communicating Strategically About Immigrant Integration. Policymaker Perspectives. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Armenta, Amada. 2017. Protect, Serve, and Deport: The Rise of Policing as Immigration Enforcement. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayeb-Karlsson, S. 2020. “No Power Without Knowledge: A Discursive Subjectivities Approach to Investigate Climate-Induced (Im)mobility and Wellbeing.” Social Sciences 9 (6): 103. doi:10.3390/socsci9060103.
   Google Scholar
• Barbehön, M., S. Münch, P. Gehring, A. Grossmann, M. Haus, and H. Heinelt. 2016. “Urban Problem Discourses: Understanding the Distinctiveness of Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 38 (2): 236–251. doi:10.1111/juaf.12206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgärtel, M., and B. Oomen. 2019. “Pulling Human Rights Back In? Local Authorities, International law and the Reception of Undocumented Migrants.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 51 (2): 172–191. doi:10.1080/07329113.2019.1624942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D. 2009. “Ideas, Institutions, and Policy Change.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (5): 701–718. doi:10.1080/13501760902983382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloemraad, I., and E. de Graauw. 2012. “Immigrant Integration and Policy in the United States: A Loosely Stitched Patchwork.” In International Perspectives: Integration and Inclusion, edited by J. Frideres and J. Biles, 205–232. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloemraad, I., E. de Graauw, and R. Hamlin. 2015. “Immigrants in the Media: Civic Visibility in the USA and Canada.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (6): 874–896. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2014.1002198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boos-Krüger, A. 2005. ‘Sozialräumliche Integration von Zuwanderern in Klein-und Mittelstädten des ländlichen Raumes.’ In Zuwanderer in der Stadt. Expertisen zum Projekt, edited by Schader-Stiftung et al., 407–444. Darmstadt: Schader-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Borkert, M., and T. Caponio. 2010. “Introduction: The Local Dimension of Migration Policy Making.” In The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking, edited by T. Caponio and M. Borkert, 9–31. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C., and J. Hampshire. 2017. “Ideas and Agency in Immigration Policy: A Discursive Institutionalist Approach.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (1): 133–150. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponio, T. 2010. “Conclusion: Making Sense of Local Migration Policy Arenas.” In The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking, edited by T. Caponio and M. Borkert, 161–195. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., and M. Borkert. 2010. The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., and M. Jones-Correa. 2018. “Theorising Migration Policy in Multilevel States: The Multilevel Governance Perspective.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (12): 1995–2010. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., P. Scholten, and R. Zapata-Barrero. 2019. The Routledge Handbook to the Governance of Migration and Diversity in Cities. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S. 2004. “The Factors That Make and Unmake Migration Policies.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 852–884. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00222.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvin, S., and B. Garcés-Mascareñas. 2012. “Beyond Informal Citizenship: The New Moral Economy of Migrant Illegality.” International Political Sociology 6 (3): 241–259. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2012.00162.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. 2012. “The “Local” Migration State: The Site-Specific Devolution of Immigration Enforcement in the U.S. South.” Law & Policy 34 (2): 159–190. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00358.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, D. A., and A. Lawlor. 2016. “Media in the Policy Process: Using Framing and Narratives to Understand Policy Influences. ”Review of Policy Research 33 (5): 472–491. doi:10.1111/ropr.12187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlvik, J. 2017. “Asylum as Construction Work: Theorizing Administrative Practices.” Migration Studies 5 (3): 369–388. doi:10.1093/migration/mnx043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm, A.-C. 2019. “Kommunale Integrationskonzepte in Deutschland.” MIDEM-Policy Paper, (1).
   Google Scholar
• de Graauw, E. 2014. “Municipal ID Cards for Undocumented Immigrants.” Politics & Society 42 (3): 309–330. doi:10.1177/0032329214543256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graauw, E., S. Gleeson, and X. Bada. 2020. “Local Context and Labour-Community Immigrant Rights Coalitions: a Comparison of San Francisco, Chicago, and Houston.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (4): 728–746. doi:0.1080/1369183X.2018.1556454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graauw, E., and F. Vermeulen. 2016. “Cities and the Politics of Immigrant Integration: A Comparison of Berlin, Amsterdam, New York City, and San Francisco.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (6): 989–1012. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörrenbächer, N. 2018. “Frontline Uses of European Union (EU) Law: A Parallel Legal Order? How Structural Discretion Conditions Uses of EU law in Dutch and German Migration Offices.” Journal of Public Policy 38 (4): 455–479. doi:10.1017/S0143814X17000095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlins, M., and J. Larrison. 2020. “Street-level Bureaucrats and the Governance of Unaccompanied Migrant Children.” Public Policy and Administration 35 (4): 403–423. doi:10.1177/0952076718811438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrkamp, P. 2019. “Geographies of Migration II: The Racial-Spatial Politics of Immigration.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (2): 363–375. doi:10.1177/0309132517747317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrkamp, P., and C. Nagel. 2014. ““Under the Radar”: Undocumented Immigrants, Christian Faith Communities, and the Precarious Spaces of Welcome in the U.S. South.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (2): 319–328. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.858573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellermann, A. 2006. “Street-level Democracy: How Immigration Bureaucrats Manage Public Opposition.” West European Politics 29 (2): 293–309. doi:10.1080/01402380500512627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eule, Tobias G. 2014. Inside Immigration Law. Migration Management and Policy Application in Germany. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, E. M., and M. R. Holman. 2017. “All Politics Is Local? County Sheriffs and Localized Policies of Immigration Enforcement.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (1): 142–154. doi:10.1177/1065912916680035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filomeno, Felipe Amin. 2017. Theories of Local Immigration Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Filsinger, D., and M. Filsinger. 2019. “Zuwanderung in Kommunen – Steuerung durch Integrationskonzepte.” disP – The Planning Review 55 (3): 68–75. doi:10.1080/02513625.2019.1671017.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher Williamson, Abigail. 2018. Welcoming New Americans? Local Governments and Immigrant Incorporation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• García, A. S., and L. Schmalzbauer. 2017. “Placing Assimilation Theory: Mexican Immigrants in Urban and Rural America.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 672 (1): 64–82. doi:10.1177/0002716217708565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glorius, B. 2020. “Diversity Development in Postsocialist Cities: The Example of East Germany.” Geographical Review. doi:10.1080/00167428.2020.1759065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulasekaram, P., and S. K. Ramakrishnan. 2013. “Immigration Federalism: A Reappraisal.” NYU Law Review 88: 2074–2145.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, W., D. Kurrek, and A. E. Töller. 2019. “Ein starker Fall für die Parteiendifferenztheorie: Die Einführung der Gesundheitskarte für Asylsuchende in den Bundesländern.” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 29 (1): 361–392. doi:10.1007/s41358-019-00193-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and R. C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (5): 936–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar, T. 1985. European Immigration Policy. A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harden, S. B., P. N. McDaniel, H. A. Smith, E. Zimmern, and K. E. Brown. 2015. “Speaking of Change in Charlotte, North Carolina: How Museums Can Shape Immigrant Receptivity in a Community Navigating Rapid Cultural Change.” Museums & Social Issues 10 (2): 117–133. doi:10.1179/1559689315Z.00000000039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, Chris, Jennifer Merolla, and S. Karthick Ramakrishnan. 2016. Framing Immigrants. News Coverage, Public Opinion, and Policy. Chicago: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Heinelt, Hubert, and Angelika Vetter. 2008. Lokale Politikforschung heute. Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, E. 2014. “Multilevel Party Politics of Immigration: Territorial Rescaling and Party Competition.” In The Politics of Immigration in Multi-level States: Governance and Political Parties, edited by E. Hepburn and R. Zapata-Barrero, 41–63. Palgrave Macmillan UK: Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, M. S. 2018. “‘Governing Difference in the City: Urban Imaginaries and the Policy Practice of Migrant Incorporation’, Territory, Politics.” Governance 6 (3): 362–380. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1306456.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Daniel J. 2018. The Increasingly United States. How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., and Y. Stavrakakis. 2009. “Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, edited by D. Howarth, A. Norval, and Y. Stavrakakis, 1–23. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X., and C. Y. Liu. 2018. “Welcoming Cities: Immigration Policy at the Local Government Level.” Urban Affairs Review 54 (1): 3–32. doi:10.1177/1078087416678999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. 2010. “Actors and Institutions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, edited by G. Morgan, J. L. Campbell, C. Crouch, O. K. Pedersen, and R. Whitley, 63–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Correa, Michael. 1998. Between Two Nations. The Political Predicament of Latinos in New York City. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Correa, M., and D. Wong. 2015. “Whose Politics? Reflections on Clarence Stone’s Regime Politics.” Urban Affairs Review 51 (1): 161–170. doi:10.1177/1078087414558949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., and M. K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?” Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 329–353. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud, Paul Statham, Marco Giugni, and Florence Passy. 2005. Contested Citizenship. Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, M., and S. Münch. 2019. “Zuwanderungspolitik – ein neues kommunales Aufgabenfeld?” disP – The Planning Review 55 (3): 22–30. doi:10.1080/02513625.2019.1670984.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, A. 2015. “Local and National Accounts of Immigration Framing in a Cross-national Perspective.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (6): 918–941. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2014.1001625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy, 30th Anniversary Edition: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Manatschal, Anita. 2013. Kantonale Integrationspolitik im Vergleich. Eine Untersuchung der Determinanten und Auswirkungen subnationaler Politikvielfalt. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Marrow, Helen B. 2011. New Destination Dreaming. Immigration, Race, and Legal Status in the Rural American South. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marrow, H. B. 2019. “Hope Turned Sour: Second-Generation Incorporation and Mobility in U.S. New Immigrant Destinations.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 43 (1): 99–118. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1667505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ariño, J., M. Moutselos, K. Schönwälder, C. Jacobs, M. Schiller, and A. Tandé. 2019. “Why Do Some Cities Adopt More Diversity Policies Than Others? A Study in France and Germany.” Comparative European Politics 17 (5): 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, Y. 2017. “Geographies of Exclusion: The Importance of Racial Legacies in Examining State-Level Immigration Laws.” American Behavioral Scientist 61 (8): 808–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp. 2014. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2019. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Demarcation, Varieties, Developments.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 20 (3): Article 16. doi:10.17169/fqs-20.3.3343.
   Google Scholar
• Myrberg, G. 2017. “Local Challenges and National Concerns: Municipal Level Responses to National Refugee Settlement Policies in Denmark and Sweden.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (2): 322–339. doi:10.1177/0020852315586309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paret, M., and S. Gleeson. 2016. “Precarity and Agency Through a Migration Lens.” Citizenship Studies 20 (3-4): 277–294. doi:0.1080/13621025.2016.1158356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penninx, Rinus, Karen Kraal, Marco Martiniello, and Steven Vertovec. 2004. Citizenship in European Cities. Immigrants, Local Politics and Integration Policies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. Guy. 2019. Institutional Theory in Political Science. The New Institutionalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, S. K., and I. Bloemraad. 2008. “Making Organizations Count: Immigrant Civic Engagement in California Cities.” In Civic Hopes and Political Realities. Immigrants, Community Organizations, and Political Engagement, edited by S. K. Ramakrishnan and I. Bloemraad, 45–76. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, S. Karthick, and Paul George Lewis. 2005. Immigrants and Local Governance. The View from City Hall. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Reichwein, A. 2018. “Kommunales Integrationsmanagement: Ansätze für eine strategische Steuerung der Integrationsarbeit.” In Handbuch Lokale Integrationspolitik, edited by F. Gesemann and R. Roth, 693–704. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schammann, H. 2015. “Wenn Variationen den Alltag bestimmen. Unterschiede lokaler Politikgestaltung in der Leistungsgewährung für Asylsuchende.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 9 (3): 161–182. doi:10.1007/s12286-015-0267-4.
   Google Scholar
• Schammann, H. 2018. “Migrationspolitik.” In Soziale Arbeit in der Migrationsgesellschaft, edited by B. Blank, S. Gögercin, K. E. Sauer, and B. Schramkowski, 67–85. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, M. 2017. “The Implementation Trap: The Local Level and Diversity Policies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (2): 267–282. doi:10.1177/0020852315590204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, M. 2019. “The Local Governance of Immigrant Integration in Europe: The State of the Art and a Conceptual Model for Future Research.” In The Routledge Handbook to the Governance of Migration and Diversity in Cities, edited by T. Caponio, P. Scholten, and R. Zapata-Barrero, 204–215. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. G. 1995. “The Parties-Do-Matter Hypothesis and the Case of the Federal Republic of Germany.” German Politics 4 (3): 1–21. doi:10.1080/09644009508404411.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. 2013. “Agenda Dynamics and the Multi-Level Governance of Intractable Policy Controversies: The Case of Migrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands.” Policy Sciences 46 (3): 217–236. doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9170-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. 2019. “Two Worlds Apart? Multilevel Governance and the Gap Between National and Local Integration Policies.” In The Routledge Handbook to the Governance of Migration and Diversity in Cities, edited by T. Caponio, P. Scholten, and R. Zapata-Barrero, 157–167. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. 2020. “Mainstreaming Versus Alienation: Conceptualising the Role of Complexity in Migration and Diversity Policymaking.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (1): 108–126. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. 2020. “Ambiguous Goals, Uneven Implementation – how Immigration Offices Shape Internal Immigration Control in Germany.” Comparative Migration Studies 8. doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0164-0.
   Google Scholar
• Schwiertz, H., and E. Steinhilper. 2020. “Countering the Asylum Paradox Through Strategic Humanitarianism: Evidence from Safe Passage Activism in Germany.” Critical Sociology 47 (2): 203–2017. doi:10.1177/0896920520932215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S., and N. Delvino. 2019. “Municipal Activism on Irregular Migrants: The Framing of Inclusive Approaches at the Local Level.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 17 (1): 27–43. doi:10.1080/15562948.2018.1519867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieß, C. 2018. “„Deutschland muss Deutschland bleiben“ – Sprachliche Selbst- und Fremdpositionierungsaktivitäten im Kontext politischer Äußerungen über Migration am Beispiel des Ausdrucks Leitkultur.” Kulturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift 3 (1): 35–55. doi:10.2478/kwg-2018-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Thränhardt, D., and M. Bommes. 2010. National Paradigms of Migration Research. Göttingen: V&R Unipress.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, B., and S. Karakayali. 2017. “The Volatility of the Discourse on Refugees in Germany.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1-2): 118–139. doi:10.1080/15562948.2017.1288284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K. E. 2014. “The Role of Geographic Context in the Local Politics of US Immigration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (7): 1040–1059. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.831544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K. E., and H. Leitner. 2011. “The Variegated Landscape of Local Immigration Policies in the United States.” Urban Geography 32 (2): 156–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, T. K. 2012. “287(g) and the Politics of Interior Immigration Control in the United States: Explaining Local Cooperation with Federal Immigration Authorities.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (5): 737–756. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2012.667983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, T. K., A. S. García, and C. Valdivia. 2019. “The Political Incorporation of Undocumented Youth.” Social Problems 66 (3): 356–372. doi:10.1093/socpro/spy009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R., T. Caponio, and P. Scholten. 2017. “Theorizing the ‘Local Turn’ in a Multi-level Governance Framework of Analysis: A Case Study in Immigrant Policies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (2): 241–246. doi:10.1177/0020852316688426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar