How political reception contexts shape location decisions of immigrants

References

• Aassve, A., G. Betti, S. Mazzuco, and L. Mencarini. 2007. “Marital Disruption and Economic Well-Being: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 170 (3): 781–799.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, W. 1964. Location and Land Use. Toward a General Theory of Land Rent.
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi, J.-T., and L. Piccoli. 2018. SWISSCIT: Index on Citizenship Law in Swiss Cantons. Neuchâtel: nccr – on the move.
   Google Scholar
• Auspurg, K., and A. Jäckle. 2017. “First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in Vignette Based Measurement.” Sociological Methods & Research 46 (3): 490–539. doi:10.1177/0049124115591016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H. S., and R. P. Walsh. 2013. “Segregation and Tiebout Sorting: The Link Between Place-Based Investments and Neighborhood Tipping.” Journal of Urban Economics 74: 83–98. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista, C., and D. McKenzie. 2021. Testing Classic Theories of Migration in the Lab. IZA Discussion Paper 14717:1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bennour, S. 2020. “Intention to Become a Citizen: Do Subnational Integration Policies Have an Influence? Empirical Evidence from Swiss Cantons.” Regional Studies 54 (11): 1535–1545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennour, S., and A. Manatschal. 2019. “Immigrants' Feelings of Attachment to Switzerland: Does the Cantonal Context Matter?” In Migrants and Expats: The Swiss Migration and Mobility Nexus, edited by I. Steiner, and P. Wanner, 189–220. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., and J. Y. Guo. 2006. Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Automobile Ownership Levels (No. 06-0990).
   Google Scholar
• Bloemraad, I. 2006. “Citizenship Lessons From the Past: The Contours of Immigrant Naturalization in the Early 20th Century.” Social Science Quarterly 87 (5): 927–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloemraad, I. 2013. “The Great Concern of Government: Public Policy as Material and Symbolic Resources.” In Outsiders No More? Models of Immigrant Political Incorporation, edited by J. Hochschild, J. Chattopadhyay, C. Gay, and M. Jones-Correa, 195–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borjas, G. J. 1999. “Immigration and Welfare Magnets.” Journal of Labor Economics 17 (4): 607–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracco, E., M. De Paola, C. P. Green, and V. Scoppa. 2018. “The Effect of Far Right Parties on the Location Choice of Immigrants: Evidence from Lega Nord Mayors.” Journal of Public Economics 166: 12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X., P. L. Mokhtarian, and S. L. Handy. 2009. “Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings.” Transport Reviews 29 (3): 359–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., and M. Borkert. 2010. The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattacin, S., and K. Bülent. 2001. Le Développement des Mesures D’intégration de la Population Migrante sur le Plan Local en Suisse. Forum Suisse Pour L’étude des Migrations. Neuchâtel: University of Neuchâtel.
   Google Scholar
• Cinalli, M., and M. Giugni. 2011. “Institutional Opportunities, Discursive Opportunities and the Political Participation of Migrants in European Cities.” In Social Capital, Political Participation and Migration in Europe, edited by L. Morales, and M. Giugni, 43–62. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P. 2013. Exodus: How Migration is Changing Our World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, P. F., C. A. Dehring, and G. K. Turnbull. 2002. “Recreation Demand and Residential Location.” Journal of urban economics 51 (3): 418–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm, A. P. 2009. “Ethnic Enclaves and Immigrant Labor Market Outcomes: Quasi-Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Labor Economics 27 (2): 281–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haas, H., and T. Fokkema. 2011. “The Effects of Integration and Transnational Ties on International Return Migration Intentions.” Demographic Research 25: 755–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depro, B., C. Timmins, and M. O’Neil. 2015. “White Flight and Coming to the Nuisance: Can Residential Mobility Explain Environmental Injustice?” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 2 (3): 439–468. doi:10.1086/682716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieleman, F. M. 2001. “Modelling Residential Mobility; A Review of Recent Trends in Research.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16 (3): 249–265.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., P. John, and T. Mergoupis. 2002. Fiscal Mobility in Metropolitan England.
   Google Scholar
• Efionayi-Mäder, D., J. Fehlmann, J. Probst, D. Ruedin, and G. D’Amato. 2020. Mit- und Nebeneinander in Schweizer Gemeinden – Wie Migration von der Ansässigen Bevölkerung Wahrgenommen Wird. Bern: Eidgenössische Migrationskommission EKM.
   Google Scholar
• Ermisch, J. F., and S. P. Jenkins. 1999. “Retirement and Housing Adjustment in Later Life: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey.” Labour Economics 6 (2): 311–333.
   Google Scholar
• Ersanilli, E., and R. Koopmans. 2011. “Do Immigrant Integration Policies Matter? A Three-Country Comparison Among Turkish Immigrants.” West European Politics 34 (2): 208–234. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.546568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersanilli, E., and S. Saharso. 2011. “The Settlement Country and Ethnic Identification of Children of Turkish Immigrants in Germany, France, and the Netherlands: What Role do National Integration Policies Play?” International Migration Review 45 (4): 907–937. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00872.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office. 2021. Les élections au Conseil national: Force des partis dans le canton (le canton=100%) – 1971–2019 | Tableau. Federal Statistical Office. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/catalogues-banques-donnees/tableaux.assetdetail.11048442.html.
   Google Scholar
• Filindra, A., and A. Manatschal. 2020. “Coping with a Changing Integration Policy Context: American State Policies and Their Effects on Immigrant Political Engagement.” Regional Studies 54 (11): 1546–1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. W., and M. Wright. 2015. “Does Mandatory Integration Matter? Effects of Civic Requirements on Immigrant Socio-Economic and Political Outcomes.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (12): 1885–1908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidon, S., M. Wicki, T. Bernauer, and K. Axhausen. 2019. “The Social Aspect of Residential Location Choice: On the Trade-Off Between Proximity to Social Contacts and Commuting.” Journal of Transport Geography 74: 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., and D. Hangartner. 2013. “Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 159–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., D. J. Hopkins, and T. Yamamoto. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices Via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22 (1): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling, M. 2008. Practising Citizenship and Heterogeneous Nationhood: Naturalisations in Swiss Municipalities. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.5117/9789089640345
   Google Scholar
• Helbling, M. 2010. “Switzerland: Contentious Citizenship Attribution in a Federal State.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (5): 793–809. doi:10.1080/13691831003764334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling, M., and H. Kriesi. 2004. “Staatsbürgerverständnis und Politische Mobilisierung: Einbürgerungen in Schweizer Gemeinden.” Swiss Political Science Review 10 (4): 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, E. 2011. “Citizens of the Region: Party Conceptions of Regional Citizenship and Immigrant Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (4): 504–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Y., Z. D. Markovich, and T. Yamamoto. 2020. “Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?” MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2018-15.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., and M. E. Austin. 2004. “Out in the Country: Sprawl and the Quest for Nature Nearby.” Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2–3): 235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. 2010. “Trade-Offs Between Equality and Difference: Immigrant Integration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in Cross-National Perspective.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., and P. Statham. 2000. Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. J., and P. Waddell. 2002. “Analysis of Lifestyle Choices: Neighborhood Type, Travel Patterns, and Activity Participation.” Transportation Research Record 1807 (1): 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S. 1966. “A Theory of Migration.” Demography 3 (1): 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, T. J. 2020. cregg: Simple Conjoint Analyses and Visualization. R package version 0.4.0.
   Google Scholar
• Leeper, T. J., S. B. Hobolt, and J. Tilley. 2020. “Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis 28 (2): 207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicka, M. 2011. “Place Attachment: How Far Have We Come in the Last 40 Years?” Journal of Environmental Psychology 31 (3): 207–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebe, U., P. Preisendörfer, and J. Meyerhoff. 2010. “To Pay or Not to Pay: Competing Theories to Explain Individuals’ Willingness to Pay for Public Environmental Goods.” Environment and Behavior 43 (1): 106–130. doi:10.1177/0013916509346229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lymperopoulou, K. 2013. “The Area Determinants of the Location Choices of New Immigrants in England.” Environment and Planning A 45 (3): 575–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manatschal, A. 2011. “Taking Cantonal Variations of Integration Policy Seriously – Or How to Validate International Concepts at the Subnational Comparative Level.” Swiss Political Science Review 17 (3): 336–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manatschal, A., V. Wisthaler, and C. I. Zuber. 2020. “Making Regional Citizens? The Political Drivers and Effects of Subnational Immigrant Integration Policies in Europe and North America.” Regional Studies 54 (11): 1475–1485. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1808882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, R. 2010. “Evaluating Migrant Integration: Political Attitudes Across Generations in Europe.” International Migration Review 44 (1): 25–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, M., and D. Jayasuriya. 2016. “Do Asylum Seekers and Refugees Choose Destination Countries? Evidence from Large-Scale Surveys in Australia, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.” International Migration 54 (4): 44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, M., B. Khadria, and C. Bauloz. 2019. World Migration Report 2020. Geneva: IOM.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, M., and C. Curtis. 2006. Housing Mobility and Location Choice: A Review of the Literature (Working Paper No. 2). Perth: Curtin University of Technology. http://urbanet.curtin.edu.au/local/pdf/ARC_TOD_Working_Paper_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, C. H., and N. T. Lauster. 2010. “Housing and Family: An Introduction.” Housing Studies 25 (4): 433–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nccr– on the move. 2020. Migration-Mobility Survey. Neuchatel: nccr – on the move.
   Google Scholar
• Paquet, M. 2014. “The Federalization of Immigration and Integration in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 47 (10): 519–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permentier, M., G. Bolt, and M. Van Ham. 2011. “Determinants of Neighbourhood Satisfaction and Perception of Neighbourhood Reputation.” Urban Studies 48 (5): 977–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, F., M. Vink, and H. Schmeets. 2016. “The Ecology of Immigrant Naturalisation: A Life Course Approach in the Context of Institutional Conditions.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (3): 359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. 2016. “In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and Intergroup Contact.” Annual Review of Psychology 67: 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfirter, L., L. S. Borrelli, D. Ruedin, and S. Kurt. 2021. “Citizenship Models and Migrant Integration – Rethinking the Intersection of Citizenship and Migrant Integration Through (b)Ordering.” In Handbook of Citizenship and Migration, edited by M. Giugni, and M. Grasso, 52–65. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Politi, E., S. Bennour, A. Lüders, A. Manatschal, and E. G. Green. 2021. “Where and Why Immigrants Intend to Naturalize: The Interplay Between Acculturation Strategies and Integration Policies.” Political Psychology. doi:10.1111/pops.12771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and R. G. Rumbaut. 2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Oakland: Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Probst, J., G. D’Amato, S. Dunning, D. Efionayi-Mäder, J. Fehlmann, A. Perret, D. Ruedin, and I. Sille. 2019. Kantonale Spielräume im Wandel.SFM-Bericht. 73. Neuchâtel: Swiss Forum for Migration and Population Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., R. Leonardi, and R. Nanetti. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rétiová, A., I. R. Božič, R. Klvaňová, and B. N. Jaworsky. 2021. “Shifting Categories, Changing Attitudes: A Boundary Work Approach in the Study of Attitudes Toward Migrants.” Sociology Compass 15 (3): e12855. doi:10.1111/soc4.12855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasser, A. C. 2010. “Voting with Their Feet: Relative Economic Conditions and State Migration Patterns.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 40 (2–3): 122–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidheiny, K., and M. Slotwinski. 2018. “Tax-Induced Mobility: Evidence from a Foreigners’ Tax Scheme in Switzerland.” Journal of Public Economics 167: 293–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S., and P. Brindley. 2012. “New Geographies of Migrant Settlement in the UK.” Geography 97 (1): 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. B. 2016. “How the Host Nation’s Boundary Drawing Affects Immigrants’ Belonging.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (7): 1153–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K. B. 2018. “What It Means to (Not) Belong: A Case Study of How Boundary Perceptions Affect Second-Generation Immigrants’ Attachments to the Nation.” Sociological Forum 33 (1): 118–138. doi:10.1111/socf.12402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J., S. Grzeskowiak, and C. Su. 2005. “Explaining Housing Preference and Choice: The Role of Self-Congruity and Functional Congruity.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 20 (4): 329–347.
   Google Scholar
• Slotwinski, M., and A. Stutzer. 2019. “The Deterrent Effect of an Anti-Minaret Vote on Foreigners’ Location Choices.” Journal of Population Economics 32 (3): 1043–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and D. Olaru. 2013. “Lifecycle Stages and Residential Location Choice in the Presence of Latent Preference Heterogeneity.” Environment and Planning A 45 (10): 2495–2514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ström, S. 2010. “Housing and First Births in Sweden, 1972–2005.” Housing Studies 25 (4): 509–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toussaint-Comeau, M., and S. L. Rhine. 2004. “The Relationship Between Hispanic Residential Location and Homeownership.” Economic Perspectives-Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 28 (3): 2.
   Google Scholar
• van Heerden, S., and D. Ruedin. 2019. “How Attitudes Towards Immigrants Are Shaped by Residential Context: The Role of Neighbourhood Dynamics, Immigrant Visibility, and Areal Attachment.” Urban Studies 56 (2): 317–334. doi:10.1177/0042098017732692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hook, J., S. K. Brown, and F. D. Bean. 2006. “For Love or Money? Welfare Reform and Immigrant Naturalization.” Social Forces 85 (2): 643–666. doi:10.1353/sof.2007.0029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L., and J. Li. 2007. “Latent Lifestyle Preferences and Household Location Decisions.” Journal of Geographical Systems 9 (1): 77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, L. 2009. “25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review.” Social Science Research 38 (3): 505–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner, P. 2014. Une Suisse à 10 Millions D’habitants. Enjeux et Débats. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
   Google Scholar
• Zufferey, J., I. Steiner, and D. Ruedin. 2021. “The Many Forms of Multiple Migrations: Evidence from a Sequence Analysis in Switzerland, 1998 to 2008.” International Migration Review 55 (1): 254–279. doi:10.1177/0197918320914239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar