From asylum seekers to kin: the making and effects of kinship between Norwegian citizens and migrants

References

• Ataç, I. 2016. “‘Refugee Protest Camp Vienna’: Making Citizens Through Locations of the Protest Movement.” Citizenship Studies 20 (5): 629–646. doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1182676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassar, L., L. Ferrero, and L. Portis. 2017. “‘More Like a Daughter Than an Employee’: The Kinning Process between Migrant Care Workers, Elderly Care Receivers and Their Extended Families.” Identities 24 (5): 524–541. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2017.1345544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardelli, N. 2022. “A Hierarchy of Refugees: Fixing Vulnerability among Refugees from Mali in Burkina Faso.” Public Anthropologist 4 (2): 135–159. doi:10.1163/25891715-bja10038
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. 2017. “The Current Crisis of Europe: Refugees, Colonialism, and the Limits of Cosmopolitanism.” European Law Journal 23 (5): 395–405. doi:10.1111/eulj.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borneman, J., and P. Ghassem-Fachandi. 2017. “The Concept of Stimmung: From Indifference to Xenophobia in Germany’s Refugee Crisis.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (3): 105–135. doi:10.14318/hau7.3.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragg, B. 2022. “(De)Constructing Refugee Vulnerability: Overcoming Institutional Barriers to Ethnographic Research with Refugee Communities.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 51 (2): 197–222. doi:10.1177/08912416211031645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, K. 2017. “Decolonial Perspectives on Charitable Spaces of “Welcome Culture” in Germany.” Social Inclusion 5 (3): 38–48. doi:10.17645/si.v5i3.1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brekke, J. P., and A. Staver. 2018. “The Renationalisation of Migration Policies in Times of Crisis: The Case of Norway.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (13): 2163–2181. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1433026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brković, Č. 2020. “Vernacular Humanitarianism.” In Humanitarianism: Keywords, edited by A. De Lauri, 224–226. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, C. 2016. “There Is No Future in Humanitarianism: Emergency, Temporality and Protracted Displacement.” History and Anthropology 27 (4): 393–410. doi:10.1080/02757206.2016.1207637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabot, H. 2019. “The Business of Anthropology and the European Refugee Regime.” American Ethnologist 46 (3): 261–275. doi:10.1111/amet.12791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carling, J. 2017. “Refugee Advocacy and the Meaning of ‘Migrants’.” PRIO Policy Brief 2. Oslo: Prio. https://www.prio.org/publications/10471.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, S., V. Mitsilegas, J. Allsopp, and L. Vosyilute. 2019. Policing Humanitarianism: Eu Policies Against Human Smuggling and Their Impacssst on Civil Society. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. 1997. Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. 2013. The Ironic Spectator: Solidarity in the Age of Post-Humanitarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Das, V., and D. Poole. 2004. Anthropology in the Margins of the State. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. (ed) 2017. The Borders of “Europe”: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. 2018. Solidarity Mobilizations in the “Refugee Crisis”: Contentious Moves. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, H. 2015. “Forget the Poor.” Current Anthropology 56 (11): S137–S145. doi:10.1086/682059.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. 2012. Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D. 2016. From Right to Favor: The Refugee Question as Moral Crisis. The Nation, 5 April 2016. Accessed 20 January 2022. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/from-right-to-favor/.
   Google Scholar
• Fechter, A.-M., and A. Schwittay. 2019. “Citizen Aid: Grassroots Interventions in Development and Humanitarianism.” Third World Quarterly 40 (10): 1769–1780. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1656062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feischmidt, M., L. Pries, and C. Cantat (eds.). 2019. Refugee Protection and Civil Society in Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gershon, I. 2011. “Neoliberal Agency.” Current Anthropology 52 (4): 537–555. doi:10.1086/660866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullestad, M. 2006. “Imagined Kinship: The Role of Descent in the Rearticulation of Norwegian Ethno-Nationalism.” In Neo-Nationalism in Europe and Beyond: Perspectives from Social Anthropology, edited by A. Gingrich, and M. Banks, 69–91. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. 2015. Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, S. 2003. “Kinning: The Creation of Life Trajectories in Transnational Adoptive Families.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (3): 465–484. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishkanian, A., and I. Shutes. 2022. “Who Needs the Experts? The Politics and Practices of Alternative Humanitarianism and Its Relationship to NGOs.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 33 (2): 397–407. doi:10.1007/s11266-021-00354-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumbert, M. G. 2021. “Making it “Easy to Help”: The Evolution of Norwegian Volunteer Initiatives for Refugees.” International Migration 59 (3): 113–124. doi:10.1111/imig.12805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumbert, M. G., and E. Pascucci. 2021. Citizen Humanitarianism at European Borders. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, S. 2018. “A ‘Kinship Anthropology of Politics’? Interest, the Collective Self, and Kinship in Argentine Unions.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 24 (2): 256–274. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maestri, G., and P. Monforte. 2020. “Who Deserves Compassion? The Moral and Emotional Dilemmas of Volunteering in the ‘Refugee Crisis.” Sociology 54 (5): 920–935.
   Google Scholar
• Malkki, L. 2015. The Need to Help: The Domestic Arts of International Humanitarianism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manderson, L., and E. Block. 2016. “Relatedness and Care in Southern Africa and Beyond.” Social Dynamics 42 (2): 205–217. doi:10.1080/02533952.2016.1218139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley, R. 2011. “The Philosophy of Kinship: A Reply to Schneider’s Critique of the Study of Kinship.” In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David. M Schneider, edited by R. Feinberg, and M. Ottenheimer, 131–167. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mogstad, H. 2021a. “Filling the Gaps: Citizen Humanitarianism in the Context of Crisis, Abandonment and Criminalisation.” In Citizen Humanitarianism at European Borders, edited by M. G. Jumbert, and E. Pascucci, 17–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mogstad, H. 2021b. Humanitarian Shame and Cosmopolitan Nationalism: Norwegian Volunteers at Home and Abroad (Doctoral Thesis. University of Cambridge).
   Google Scholar
• Monforte, P., G. Maestri, and E. d’Halluin. 2021. “‘It’s Like Having One More Family Member’: Private Hospitality, Affective Responsibility and Intimate Boundaries Within Refugee Hosting Networks.” Journal of Sociology 57 (3): 674–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B., K. Haugevik, and J. H. S. Lie. 2018. “Kinship in International Relations: Introduction and Framework.” In Kinship in International Relations, edited by K. Haugevik, and I. B. Neumann, 1–20. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• NOAS. 2018. “Who’s the Strictest? A Mapping of the Afghanistan-Policies in Western European Countries”. Accessed 23 June 2022. https://www.noas.no/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Afghanistan-notat-på-engelsk.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2021. “Saving the Souls of White Folk: Humanitarianism as White Supremacy.” Security Dialogue 52: 98–106. doi:10.1177/09670106211024419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe, T. 2022. “Addressing the Methodological Challenges That Cloaked Profiles Pose to Digital Observations.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1–22. doi:10.1177/089124162211354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe, T. 2023. “Digital Citizen Humanitarianism: Enabling informal civilian support to migrants across Europe.” (Forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, T., and H. B. Haddeland. 2021. “Diverging Interpretations of Humanitarian Exceptions: Assisting Rejected Asylum Seekers in Norway.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–18. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2021.1965469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, R. 1987. “Toward a ‘Nuclear Freeze’? The Gender Politics of Euro-American Kinship Analysis.” In In Feminism and Kinship Theory, edited by S. Yanagisako, and J. Collier, 119–131. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, S., and J. Winkler. 2014. “Com/Passionate Protests: Fighting the Deportation of Asylum Seekers.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 19 (2): 165–184. doi:10.17813/maiq.19.2.h464488477p76grm
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozakou, K. 2017. “Solidarity Humanitarianism: The Blurred Boundaries of Humanitarianism in Greece.” Etnofoor 29 (2): 99–104. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26296172.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. 2013. What Kinship Is –And Is Not. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandri, E. 2018. “‘Volunteer Humanitarianism’: Volunteers and Humanitarian Aid in the Jungle Refugee Camp of Calais.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (1): 65–80. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1352467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik, K. B. 2018. “Technology, Dead Male Bodies, and Feminist Recognition: Gendering ICT Harm Theory.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 44 (1): 49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson, and L. Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stavinoha, L., and K. Ramakrishnan. 2021. “Approaching Biographical Life: Grass-Roots Humanitarianism in Europe.” In Citizen Humanitarianism at European Borders, edited by M. G. Jumbert, and E. Pascucci, 178–192. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, I. 2019. “Buddy Schemes between Refugees and Volunteers in Germany: Transformative Potential in an Unequal Relationship?” Social Inclusion 7 (2): 128–138. doi:10.17645/si.v7i2.2041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. 2016. “Thinking Beyond Humanitarian Borders.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 83 (2): 255–271. doi:10.1353/sor.2016.0030
   Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R. 2019. “Subversive Humanitarianism: Rethinking Refugee Solidarity Through Grass-Roots Initiatives.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 38 (3): 245–265. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdz008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R., and G. Verschraegen. 2019. “The European Refugee Controversy: Civil Solidarity, Cultural Imaginaries and Political Change.” Social Inclusion 7 (2): 48–52. doi:10.17645/si.v7i2.2260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan, S., J. Edwards, R. Willerslev, E. Povinelli, and P. Mody. 2011. “The Anthropological Fixation with Reciprocity Leaves No Room for Love: 2009 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory.” Critique of Anthropology 31 (3): 210–250. doi:10.1177/0308275X11409732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vike, H. 2018. Politics and Bureaucracy in the Norwegian Welfare State. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, K. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuntz, A.-C. 2021. “Refugees’ Transnational Livelihoods and Remittances: Syrian Mobilities in the Middle East Before and After 2011.” Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (2): 1400–1422. doi:10.1093/jrs/feab016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar