Identification of genomic differences between Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii by Representational Difference Analysis (RDA)

References

• Kwon-Chung KJ, Boekhout T, Fell JW, Diaz M. Proposal to conserve the name Cryptococcus gattii against C. hondurianus and C. bacillisporus (Basidiomycota, Hymenomycetes,Tremenomycetidae). Taxon 2002; 51: 804–806
   Google Scholar
• Okabayashi K, Kano R, Watanabe S, Hasegawal A. Expression of capsule-associated genes of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mycopathologia 2005; 160: 1–7
   Google Scholar
• Latouche GN, Sorrell TC, Meyer W. Isolation and characterization of the phospholipase B gene of Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii. FEMS Yeast Res 2002; 2: 551–561
   Google Scholar
• Cox GM, McDade HC, Chen SC, et al. Extracellular phospholipase activity is a virulence factor for Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 2001; 39: 166–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox GM, Mukherjee J, Cole GT, Casadevall A, Perfect JR. Urease as a virulence factor in experimental cryptococcosis. Infect Immun 2000; 68: 443–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casadevall A, Perfect JR. Cryptococcus neoformans. The American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC 1998
   Google Scholar
• Kidd SE, Bach PJ, Hingston AO, et al. Cryptococcus gattii dispersal mechanism, British Columbia, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13: 51–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd SE, Hagen F, Tscharke RL, et al. A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 17258–17263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDougall L, Fyfe M. Emergence of Cryptococcus gattii in a novel environment provides clues to its incubation period. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 1851–1852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang LM, Maguire JA, Doyle P, Fyfe M, Roscoe DL. Cryptococcus neoformans infections at Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre (1997–2002):Epidemiology, microbiology and histopathology. J Med Microbiol 2004; 53: 935–940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrell TC. Cryptococcus neoformans variety gattii. Med Mycol 2001; 39: 155–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer W, Castañeda A, Jackson S, et al. Molecular typing of iberoamerican Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Emerg Infect Dis 2003; 9: 189–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litvintseva AP, Thakur R, Vilgalys R, Mitchell TG. Multilocus sequence typing reveals three genetic subpopulations of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii (serotype A), including a unique population in Botswana. Genetics 2006; 172: 2223–2238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boekhout T, Theelen B, Diaz M, et al. Hybrid genotypes in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiology 2001; 147: 891–907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz MR, Boekhout T, Kiesling T, Fell JW. Comparative analysis of the intergenic spacer regions and population structure of the species complex of the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Yeast Res 2005; 5: 1129–1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz MR, Boekhout T, Theelen B, Fell JW. Molecular sequence analyses of the intergenic spacer (IGS) associated with rDNA of the two varieties of the pathogenic yeast, Cryptococcus neoformans. System Appl Microbiol 2000; 23: 535–545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Vilgalys R, Mitchell TG. Multiple gene genealogies reveal recent dispersion and hybridization in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Ecol 2000; 9: 1471–1481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus BJ, Fung E, Roncaglia P, et al. The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Science 2005; 307: 1321–1324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisitsyn N, Lisitsyn N, Wigler M. Cloning the differences between two complex genomes. Science 1993; 259: 946–951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubank M, Schatz DG. Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22: 5640–5648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa e Silva LK, Staats CC, Goulart LS, et al. Identification of novel temperature-regulated genes in the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans using representational difference analysis. Res Microbiol 2008; 159: 221–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alzate JF, Ramírez-Pineda JR, González VM, et al. Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis: Cloning of the histone H1 genes by representational difference analysis. Exp Parasitol 2006; 112: 126–129
   Google Scholar
• Bailão AM, Schrank A, Borges CL, et al. Differential gene expression by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in host interaction conditions: representational difference analysis identifies candidate genes associated with fungal pathogenesis. Microbes Infect 2006; 8: 2686–2697
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dutra V, Nakasato L, Broetto L, et al. Application of representational difference analysis to identify sequence tags expressed by Metharizium anisopliae during the infection process of the tick Boophilus microplus cuticle. Res Microbiol 2004; 155: 245–251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowler LD, Hubank M, Spratt BG. Representational difference analysis of cDNA for the detection of differential gene expression in bacteria: development using a model of iron-regulated gene expression in Neisseria meningitidis. Microbiology 1999; 145: 3529–3537
   Google Scholar
• Casali AK, Goulart L, Silva LKR, et al. Molecular typing of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in the Brazilian state Rio Grande do Sul. FEMS Yeast Res 2003; 3: 405–415
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros Ribeiro A, Silva LK, Silveira Schrank I, et al. Isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans serotype D from Eucalypts in South Brazil. Med Mycol 2006; 44: 707–713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 2001
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Yang Y, Castlebury LA, Cerniglia CE. A method for the large scale isolation of high transformation efficiency fungal genomic DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1996; 145: 261–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastorian K, Hawell L, Byus CV. Optimization of cDNA representational difference analysis for the identification of differentially expressed mRNAs. Anal Biochem 2000; 283: 89–98
   Google Scholar
• Ewing B, Hillier LM, Wendl C, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using PHRED. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998; 8: 175–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 3389–3402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staden R, Beal KF, Bonfield JK. The Staden package. Methods Mol Biol 2000; 132: 115–130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The Clustal_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 4876–4882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas KB, Nicholas HB, Jr., Deerfiled DW. GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. EMBnet News 1997; 4: 14
   Google Scholar
• Del Rio ML, Navas-Mendez J, Gutierrez-Martin CB, Rodriguez-Barbosa JI, Rodriguez-Ferri EF. Identification of sulI allele of dihydropteroate synthase by representational difference analysis in Haemophilus parasuis serovar 2. Lett Appl Microbiol 2005; 40: 436–442
   Google Scholar
• Qiu WQ, Folstein MF. Insulin, insulin-degrading enzyme and amyloid-peptide in Alzheimer's disease: review and hypothesis. Neurobiol Aging 2006; 27: 190–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adames N, Blundell K, Ashby MN, Boone C. Role of yeast insulin-degrading enzyme homologs in propheromone processing and bud site selection. Science 1995; 270: 464–467
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujita A, Oka C, Arikawa Y, et al. A yeast gene necessary for bud-site selection encodes a protein similar to insulin-degrading enzymes. Nature 1994; 372: 567–570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim S, Lapham AN, Freedman CGK, Reed TL, Schmidt WK. Yeast as a tractable genetic system for functional studies of the insulin-degrading enzyme. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 27481–27490
   Google Scholar
• Banks IR, Specht CA, Donlin MJ, et al. A chitin synthase and its regulator protein are critical for chitosan production and growth of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Eucaryot Cell 2005; 4: 1902–1912
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walton FJ, Idnurm A, Heitman J. Novel gene functions required for melanization of the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 2005; 57: 1381–1396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agron PG, Macht M, Radnedge L, et al. Use of subtractive hybridization for comprehensive surveys of procaryotic genome differences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002; 211: 175–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagerström CG, Sun BI, Sive HL. Subtractive cloning: past, present and future. Annu Rev Biochem 1997; 66: 751–783
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cao Y, He Z, Wang Z, et al. Hybridization monitor: A method for identifying differences between complex genomes. J Microbiol Meth 2006; 64: 305–315
   Google Scholar
• Litvintseva AP, Marra RE, Nielsen K, et al. Evidence of sexual recombination among Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A isolates in sub-Saharan Africa. Eukaryot Cell 2003; 2: 1162–1168
   Google Scholar