The economic value of INTUITY in aortic valve replacement

References

• Bach DS, Radeva JI, Birnbaum HG, et al. Prevalence, referral patterns, testing, and surgery in aortic valve disease: leaving women and elderly patients behind? J Heart Valve Dis 2007;16:362-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016;133:447-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma BJ, van Den Brink RB, van Der Meulen JH, et al. To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences. Heart 1999;82:143-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang DH, Park SJ, Rim JH, et al. Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2010;121:1502-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz F, Baumann P, Manthey J, et al. The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation 1982;66:1105-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, et al. Survival in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis is dramatically improved by aortic valve replacement: results from a cohort of 277 patients aged > or =80 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:722-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach DS, Siao D, Girard SE, et al. Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:533-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly HM, Oh JK, Orszulak TA, et al. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. Circulation 1997;95:2395-400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filsoufi F, Rahmanian PB, Castillo JG, et al. Excellent early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement in people aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:255-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvidal P, Bergstrom R, Horte LG, et al. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:747-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy ES, Lawson RM, Starr A, et al. Severe aortic stenosis in patients 60 years of age or older: left ventricular function and 10-year survival after valve replacement. Circulation 1981;64:II184-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundt TM, Bailey MS, Moon MR, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation 2000;102:III70-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thourani VH, Myung R, Kilgo P, et al. Long-term outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a modern perspective. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1458-64; discussion 1464–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:e1-e132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark MA, Duhay FG, Thompson AK, et al. Clinical and economic outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement in Medicare patients. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2012;5:117-26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:670-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, et al. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:1499-1511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher AA, Laufer G, Haverich A, et al. One-year outcomes of the surgical treatment of aortic stenosis with a next generation surgical aortic valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:110-15; discussion 115-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borger MA, Dohmen PM, Knosalla C, et al. Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trialdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar 2. pii: ezw042. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Chitwood WR Jr, Barnhart GRR, Accola KD, et al. TRANSFORM US clinical trial: safety and performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve. Oral Presentation. American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Annual Meeting. Baltimore, MD. May 16, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Likosky DS, Sorensen MJ, Dacey LJ, et al. Long-term survival of the very elderly undergoing aortic valve surgery. Circulation 2009;120:S127-S33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehr P, Yanez D, Ash A, et al. Methods for analysing health care utilization and costs. Annu Rev Public Health 1999;20:125-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1599-604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabata M, Aranki SF, Fox JA, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in left ventricular dysfunction. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2007;15:225-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corbi P, Rahmati M, Donal E, et al. Prospective comparison of minimally invasive and standard techniques for aortic valve replacement: initial experience in the first hundred patients. J Card Surg 2003;18:133-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa N, Kuss O, Aboud A, et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014;46:221-6; discussion 226–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klokocovnik T, Kersnik Levart T, Bunc M. Double venous drainage through the superior vena cava in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a retrospective study. Croat Med J 2012;53:11-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamelas J, Sarria A, Santana O, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus median sternotomy in patients age 75 years or greater. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:79-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Bevilacqua S, et al. Traversing the learning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon's experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41:1242-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely RC, Boskovski MT, Gosev I, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women’s Hospital experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015;4:38-48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruttmann E, Gilhofer TS, Ulmer H, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of aortic valve replacement by mini-thoracotomy. J Heart Valve Dis 2010;19:606-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, et al. Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:887-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borger MA, Moustafine V, Conradi L, et al. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:17-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowdish ME, Hui DS, Cleveland JD, et al. A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:456-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanta RK, Lapar DJ, Kern JA, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: a real-world multi-institutional analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;149:1060-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmanov D, Bevilacqua S, Murzi M, et al. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:837-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:1222-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glower DD, Desai BS, Hughes GC, et al. Aortic valve replacement via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy: a propensity score analysis. Innovations (Phila) 2014;9:75-81; discussion 81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahesh B, Navaratnarajah M, Mensah K, et al. Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement: is it safe and effective? Comparison with standard techniques. J Heart Valve Dis 2011;20:650-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone F, Punta G, Parisi F, et al. Right minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for the aortic valve replacement: preliminary results. Heart Lung Circ 2012;21:169-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamou SC, Kapetanakis EI, Lowery R, et al. Allogeneic blood transfusion requirements after minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a risk-adjusted analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1101-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanoverbeke H, Van Belleghem Y, Francois K, et al. Operative outcome of minimal access aortic valve replacement versus standard procedure. Acta Chir Belg 2004;104:440-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korach A, Shemin RJ, Hunter CT, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a 10-year experience. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2010;51:417-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderon J, Richebe P, Guibaud JP, et al. Prospective randomized study of early pulmonary evaluation of patients scheduled for aortic valve surgery performed by ministernotomy or total median sternotomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;23:795-801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet JM, Rondelet B, Jansens JL, et al. Assessment based on EuroSCORE of ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2004;12:53-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farhat F, Lu Z, Lefevre M, et al. Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2003;18:396-401; discussion 402–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa MA, Abdelsamad AA, Zakaria G, et al. Minimal vs median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2007;15:472-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahangar AG, Charag AH, Wani ML, et al. comparing aortic valve replacement through right anterolateral thoracotomy with median sternotomy. Int Cardiovasc Res J 2013;7:90-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suenaga E, Suda H, Katayama Y, et al. Comparison of limited and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;52:286-91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dogan S, Dzemali O, Wimmer-Greinecker G, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:76-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foghsgaard S, Schmidt TA, Kjaergard HK. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: late conversion to full sternotomy doubles operative time. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36:293-297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folliguet TA, Laborde F, Zannis K, et al. Sutureless perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1483-1488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candaele S, Herijgers P, Demeyere R, et al. Chest pain after partial upper versus complete sternotomy for aortic valve surgery. Acta Cardiol. 2003;58:17-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar