Surgical treatment, complications, and reimbursement among patients with clavicle fracture and acromioclavicular dislocations: a US retrospective claims database analysis

References

• Nordqvist A, Petersson C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;300:127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, et al. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:452–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:476–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards SG, Whittle AP, Wood GW, 2nd. Nonoperative treatment of ipsilateral fractures of the scapula and clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:774–780.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung KS, Lam TP. Open reduction and internal fixation of ipsilateral fractures of the scapular neck and clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1015–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglesang HF, Flugsrud GB, Randsborg PH, et al. Radiological and functional outcomes 2.7 years following conservatively treated completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136:17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson CM, Goudie EB, Murray IR, et al. Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1576–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltz S, Krijnen P, Schipper IB. Plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:1051–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paladini P, Pellegrini A, Merolla G, et al. Treatment of clavicle fractures. Transl Med UniSa. 2012;2:47–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rongguang A, Zhen J, Jianhua Z, et al. Surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: precontoured plates versus noncontoured plates. J Hand Surg. 2016;41:e263–e266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanter NJ, Kenny RM, Baker CL III, et al. Surgical treatment of clavicle fractures in the adolescent athlete. Sports Health. 2015;7:137–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiel J, Keiser K. Acromioclavicular joint, injury. [updated 2018, April 5]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2018 [cited 2018 Sep 13]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493188/
   Google Scholar
• Tang G, Zhang Y, Liu Y, et al. Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97:e9690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips AM, Smart C, Groom AF. Acromioclavicular dislocation. Conservative or surgical therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(353):10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Smith TO, Chester R, Pearse EO, et al. Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2011;12:19–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tamaoki MJ, Belloti JC, Lenza M, et al. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;4:CD007429.
   Google Scholar
• Chang N, Furey A, Kurdin A. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsten K, Gunning AC, Leenen LP. Operative or conservative treatment in patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and update of current literature. Int Orthop. 2014;38:831–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Rizzello G, et al. Surgical versus conservative management of Type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2017;122:31–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanselman AE, Murphy TR, Bal GK, et al. Operative cost comparison: plating versus intramedullary fixation for clavicle fractures. Orthopedics. 2016;39:e877–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzahrani MM, Cota A, Alkhelaifi K, et al. Are clinical outcomes affected by type of plate used for management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures? J Orthop Traumatol. 2018;19:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemitsch LA, Schemitsch EH, Kuzyk P, et al. Prognostic factors for reoperation after plate fixation of the midshaft clavicle. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:533–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro RA, Gelber JD, Harrast JJ, et al. Frequency and complications after operative fixation of clavicular fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25:e125–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capkun G, Lahoz R, Verdun E, et al. Expanding the use of administrative claims databases in conducting clinical real-world evidence studies in multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31:1029–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chastek BJ, Oleen-Burkey M, Lopez-Bresnahan MV. Medical chart validation of an algorithm for identifying multiple sclerosis relapse in healthcare claims. J Med Econ. 2010;13:618–625.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sox HC. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right. Med Care. 2010;48:S7–S8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consumer Price Index (CPI); 2018 [cited 2018]. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/cpi/
   Google Scholar
• Cadarette SM, Wong L. An introduction to health care administrative data. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015;68:232–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leroux T, Wasserstein D, Henry P, et al. Rate of and risk factors for reoperations after open reduction and internal fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1119–1125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Modi CS, Beazley J, Zywiel MG, et al. Controversies relating to the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:1595–1602.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim S, Blank A, Strauss E. Management of type 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocations–current controversies. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2014;72:53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Horst K, Garving C, Thometzki T, et al. Comparative study on the treatment of Rockwood type III acute acromioclavicular dislocation: clinical results from the TightRope((R)) technique vs. K-wire fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:171–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokkar S, Radwan M, Toreih A. Hook plate versus tightrope for acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation. Egypt Orthop J. 2016;51:137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Chang TI, Winkelmayer WC. Comparative effectiveness research: what is it and why do we need it in nephrology? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:2156–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar