4,533
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Cost-effectiveness of enzalutamide versus apalutamide versus androgen deprivation therapy alone for the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in Canada

, , , , , & show all
Pages 583-590 | Received 14 Jan 2022, Accepted 13 Apr 2022, Published online: 13 May 2022

References

  • Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian cancer statistics 2016. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2016; [cited 2022 March 24]. Available from: www.cancer.ca/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2016-EN.pdf.
  • Malone S, Shayegan B, Basappa NS, et al. Management algorithms for metastatic prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;14(2):50–60.
  • de Oliveira C, Bremner KE, Pataky R, et al. Trends in use and cost of initial cancer treatment in Ontario: a population-based descriptive study. CMAJ Open. 2013;1(4):E151–E158.
  • So AI, Chi KN, Danielson B, et al. Canadian Urological Association-Canadian Urologic Oncology Group guideline on metastatic castration-naive and castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14(2):17–23.
  • Sweeney CJ, Chen YH, Carducci M, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(8):737–746.
  • Kyriakopoulos CE, Chen YH, Carducci MA, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized phase III E3805 CHAARTED trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(11):1080–1087.
  • Gravis G, Boher JM, Chen YH, et al. Burden of metastatic castrate naive prostate cancer patients, to identify men more likely to benefit from early docetaxel: further analyses of CHAARTED and GETUG-AFU15 studies. Eur Urol. 2018;73(6):847–855.
  • Danielson B, Saad F, So A, et al. Management algorithms for prostate-specific antigen progression in prostate cancer: biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy and progression to non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(12):420–426.
  • Appukkuttan S, Tangirala K, Babajanyan S, et al. A retrospective claims analysis of advanced prostate cancer costs and resource use. Pharmacoecon Open. 2020;4(3):439–447.
  • Sullivan PW, Mulani PM, Fishman M, et al. Quality of life findings from a multicenter, multinational, observational study of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(4):571–575.
  • Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, et al. Prostate cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2022; [cited 2022 February 23] Available from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf.
  • Saad F, Canil C, Finelli A, et al. Controversial issues in the management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: results from a Canadian consensus forum. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14(4):E137–E149.
  • Alberta Health Services. Advanced/metastatic prostate cancer. 2018; [April 2021]. Available from: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/hp/cancer/if-hp-cancer-guide-gu010-met-prostate.pdf.
  • Rice MA, Malhotra SV, Stoyanova T. Second-generation antiandrogens: from discovery to standard of care in castration resistant prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:801.
  • Weiner AB, Nettey OS, Morgans AK. Management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): an evolving treatment paradigm. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019;20(9):69.
  • Armstrong AJ, Szmulewitz RZ, Petrylak DP, et al. ARCHES: a randomized, phase III study of androgen deprivation therapy with enzalutamide or placebo in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(32):2974–2986.
  • Davis ID, Martin AJ, Stockler MR, et al. Enzalutamide with standard first-line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(2):121–131.
  • Stenzl A, Dunshee C, De Giorgi U, et al. Effect of enzalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: an analysis of the ARCHES randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Eur Urol. 2020;78(4):603–614.
  • Chi KN, Agarwal N, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide for metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(1):13–24.
  • Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada, CADTH. 2017. Available from: https://www.cadth.ca/dv/guidelines-economic-evaluation-health-technologies-canada-4th-edition.
  • Zhang PF, Xie D, Li Q. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabazitaxel for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel and androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor resistance. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):35.
  • Beca J, Majeed H, Chan KKW, et al. Cost-effectiveness of docetaxel in high-volume hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(12):396–403.
  • Rashid M, Ramesh M, Shamshavali K, et al. Efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-androgens in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2020;15(1):34–47.
  • Beer TM, Tombal B. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(18):1755–1756.
  • de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(21):1995–2005.
  • de Bono JS, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, et al. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9747):1147–1154.
  • Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):138–148.
  • Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1502–1512.
  • Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1187–1197.
  • Skaltsa K, Longworth L, Ivanescu C, et al. Mapping the FACT-P to the preference-based EQ-5D questionnaire in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Value Health. 2014;17(2):238–244.
  • Wang L, Paller C, Hong H, et al. Comparison of treatments for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: matching-adjusted indirect comparison and network meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(2):191–202.
  • Schedule of Benefits for Laboratory Services: Ministry of Health, Ontario Health Insurance Plan Laboratories and Genetics Branch 2020. Available from: https://health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ohip/sob/lab/lab_mn2020.pdf.
  • Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2017;18(7):547–612.
  • Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary/Comparative Drug Index. 2021. Available from: https://www.formulary.health.gov.on.ca/formulary/.
  • Hay JW, Smeeding J, Carroll NV, et al. Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost effectiveness analyses: issues and recommendations: the ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force report-Part I. Value Health. 2010;13(1):3–7.
  • Garrison LP, Jr., Mansley EC, Abbott TA, 3rd, et al. Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost-effectiveness analyses: a societal perspective: the ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force report-Part II. Value Health. 2010;13(1):8–13.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Developing NICE guidelines: the manual. 2014. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg20/resources/developing-nice-guidelines-the-manual-pdf-72286708700869.
  • Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network Meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011;14(4):417–428.
  • Chen J, Ni Y, Sun G, et al. Comparison of current systemic combination therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and selection of candidates for optimal treatment: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:519388.
  • Mori K, Mostafaei H, Sari Motlagh R, et al. Systemic therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: network meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2021;129(4):423–433.
  • Sathianathen NJ, Koschel S, Thangasamy IA, et al. Indirect comparisons of efficacy between combination approaches in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77(3):365–372.
  • Komura K, Sweeney CJ, Inamoto T, et al. Current treatment strategies for advanced prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2018;25(3):220–231.
  • DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG, et al. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):290–308.
  • Siegel DA, O’Neil ME, Richards TB, et al. Prostate cancer incidence and survival, by stage and race/ethnicity – United States, 2001–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(41):1473–1480.