2,159
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Beyond medicines’ barriers: exploring the true cost of multiple myeloma

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1167-1175 | Received 20 May 2022, Accepted 06 Oct 2022, Published online: 17 Nov 2022

References

  • International Myeloma Foundation. Who Gets Multiple Myeloma. 2019. [cited 2021 April 7]. https://www.myeloma.org/what-is-multiple-myeloma.
  • Cowan AJ, Allen C, Barac A, et al. Global burden of multiple myeloma: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(9):1221–1227.
  • Drummond M. Cost-of-Illness studies. Pharmacoeconomics. 1992;2(1):1–4.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) Universal health coverage 2030 (UHC); 2022. https://www.uhc2030.org/
  • United Nations (UN) Agenda 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. https://www.un.org/humansecurity/agenda-2030/
  • European Medicines Agency (EMA). EMA Regulatory Science to 2025. EMA/110706/2020. 2020. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/ema-regulatory-science-2025-strategic-reflection_en.pdf
  • EUnetHTA (European network for Health Technology Assessment). 2021. https://eunethta.eu/
  • Hamadeh I, Atrash S, Matusz Fisher A, et al. Advances & future prospects in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Adv Cell Gene Ther. 2021;4(1):e96.
  • Hepp R. Blood cancer care costs skyrocket for Medicare patients. Oncology Times. 2020;42(S2):9–10.
  • Larg A, Moss JR. Cost-of-illness studies: a guide to critical evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(8):653–671.
  • Critical Appraisal Skills Programme 2018. CASP Economic Evaluation Checklist. [online]. https://casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Economic-Evaluation-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, The PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and MetaAnalyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
  • Ashcroft J, Judge D, Dhanasiri S, et al. Chart review across EU5 in MM post-ASCT patients. Int J Hematol Oncol. 2018;7(1):IJH05.
  • Gonzalez-McQuire S, Yong K, Leleu H, et al. Healthcare resource utilization among patients with relapsed multiple myeloma in the UK, France, and Italy. J Med Econ. 2018;21(5):450–467.
  • Thompson JF, Teh Z, Chen Y, et al. A costing study of bortezomib shows equivalence of its real-world costs to conventional treatment. Br J Haematol. 2020;189(3):e76–e79.
  • Jackson G, Galinsky J, Alderson DEC, et al. Productivity losses in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma following stem cell transplantation and the impact of maintenance therapy. Eur J Haematol. 2019;103(4):393–401.
  • Robinson D, Jr Orlowski RZ, He J, et al. Economic burden of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results from an international trial. Blood. 2015;126(23):875–875.
  • Holbro A, Ahmad I, Cohen S, et al. Safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(4):547–551.
  • Touati M, Lamarsalle L, Moreau S, et al. Cost savings of home bortezomib injection in patients with multiple myeloma treated by a combination care in outpatient hospital and hospital care at home. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(12):5007–5014.
  • Martino M, Pellicano G, Moscato T, et al. At-home management of aplastic phase following high-dose melphalan and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma patients: a pilot study. Blood. 2011;118(21):4497.
  • Kodad SG, Sutherland H, Limvorapitak W, et al. Outpatient autologous stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: Analysis of safety and outcomes in a tertiary care center. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19(12):784–790.
  • Lassalle A, Thomaré P, Fronteau C, et al. Home administration of bortezomib in multiple myeloma is cost-effective and is preferred by patients compared with hospital administration: results of a prospective single-center study. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(2):314–318.
  • Nikonova A, Zeglinski C, Husain S, et al. Infectious complications in the outpatient and inpatient autologous stem cell transplantation setting for patients with multiple myeloma. Princess Margaret Cancer Center Experience. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):4614–4614.
  • Martino M, Console G, Russo L, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: an activity-based costing analysis, comparing a total inpatient model versus an early discharge model. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17(8):506–512.
  • Kolovos S, Nador G, Kishore B, et al. Unplanned admissions for patients with myeloma in the UK: Low frequency but high costs. J Bone Oncol. 2019;17:100243.
  • de Oliveira C, Cheng J, Chan K, et al. High-Cost patients and preventable spending: a Population-Based study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(1):23–31.
  • Robinson D, Jr Orlowski RZ, Stokes M, et al. Economic burden of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Results from an international trial. Eur J Haematol. 2017;99(2):119–132.
  • Wong R, Tay J. Economics of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):4773–4773.
  • Ashcroft J, Duran I, Hoefeler H, et al. Healthcare resource utilisation associated with skeletal‐related events in european patients with multiple myeloma: Results from a prospective, multinational, observational study. Eur J Haematol. 2018;100(5):479–487.
  • Cowan AJ, Baldomero H, Atsuta Y, et al. The global state of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: an analysis of the worldwide network of blood and marrow transplantation (WBMT) database and the global burden of disease study. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):412.