2,932
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Focal therapy versus radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy as primary treatment options for non-metastatic prostate cancer: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1099-1107 | Received 09 May 2023, Accepted 22 Aug 2023, Published online: 08 Sep 2023

References

  • Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(37):1–176. doi: 10.3310/hta24370.
  • Lane JA, Donovan JL, Young GJ, et al. Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (prostate testing for cancer and treatment [ProtecT] study). BJU Int. 2022;130 (3):370–380. doi: 10.1111/bju.15739.
  • Reddy D, Peters M, Shah TT, et al. Cancer control outcomes following focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound in 1379 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a multi-institute 15-year experience. Eur Urol. 2022;82(3):e74–e75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.005.
  • Lovegrove CE, Peters M, Guillaumier S, et al. Evaluation of functional outcomes after a second focal high-intensity focused ultrasonography (HIFU) procedure in men with primary localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer: results from the HIFU evaluation and assessment of treatment (HEAT) registry. BJU Int. 2020;125(6):853–860. doi: 10.1111/bju.15004.
  • Shah TT, Peters M, Miah S, et al. Assessment of return to baseline urinary and sexual function following primary focal cryotherapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(2):301–308. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.004.
  • van Son MJ, Peters M, Reddy D, et al. Conventional radical versus focal treatment for localised prostate cancer: a propensity score weighted comparison of 6-year tumour control. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021;24(4):1120–1128. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00369-6.
  • Shah TT, Peters M, Eldred-Evans D, et al. Early-medium-term outcomes of primary focal cryotherapy to treat nonmetastatic clinically significant prostate cancer from a prospective multicentre registry. Eur Urol. 2019;76(1):98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.030.
  • Shah TT, Ahmed H, Kanthabalan A, et al. Focal cryotherapy of localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014;14(11):1337–1347. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2014.965687.
  • Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243–262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042.
  • National institute for health and care excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management, London 2021.
  • Habashy D, Reddy D, Peters M, et al. Evaluation of outcomes following focal ablative therapy for treatment of localized clinically significant prostate cancer in patients >70 years: a multi-institute, multi-energy 15-year experience. J Urol. 2023;210(1):108–116. doi: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003443.
  • Noble SM, Garfield K, Lane JA, et al. The ProtecT randomised trial cost-effectiveness analysis comparing active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(7):1063–1070. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0978-4.
  • Andersson SO, Andren O, Lyth J, et al. Managing localized prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: cost analysis of a randomized trial (SPCG-4). Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2011;45(3):177–183. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2010.545075.
  • Torvinen S, Farkkila N, Sintonen H, et al. Health-related quality of life in prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(6):1094–1101. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.760848.
  • Protopapa E, Smith SC, Brew-Graves C, et al. TrueNth UK post surgery – urinary function in the 1st post-operative year in a 1000 man contemporary radical prostatectomy cohort. J Urol. 2018;199(4S):E739. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1755.
  • Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1138–1144. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa011788.
  • Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1425–1437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606221.
  • Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1250–1261. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311.
  • Prabhu V, Sivarajan G, Taksler GB, et al. Long-term continence outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65(1):52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.006.
  • Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):216–225. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013 [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2013 Apr 4. Process and Methods Guides No. 9.
  • Ramsay CR, Adewuyi TE, Gray J, et al. Ablative therapy for people with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(49):1–490. doi: 10.3310/hta19490.
  • Boyd KA, Jones RJ, Paul J, et al. Decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare prostate cryotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of radiation recurrent prostate cancer. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e007925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007925.
  • Hu JC, Laviana A, Sedrakyan A. High-Intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: novelty or innovation? JAMA. 2016;315(24):2659–2660. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5002.