Early exploration of the economic impact of transradial access (TRA) versus transfemoral access (TFA) for neurovascular procedures in Spain

References

• Kaki A, Blank N, Alraies MC, et al. Access and closure management of large bore femoral arterial access. J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31(6):969–977. doi: 10.1111/joic.12571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel P, Haussen DC, Nogueira RG, et al. The neuro radialist. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2020;9(1):75–86. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2019.08.008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snelling BM, Sur S, Shah SS, et al. Transradial access: lessons learned from cardiology. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(5):487–492. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Moret J, Barreau X, et al. Aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of two prospective, multicenter series: 3-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;87(2):357–367.
   Google Scholar
• Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;16(1):3–7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810160103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, et al. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(11):1047–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunet M-C, Chen SH, Peterson EC, et al. Transradial access for neurointerventions: management of access challenges and complications. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(1):82–86. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo RP, Tremmel JA, Rao S, et al. Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the transradial committee of the SCAI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78(6):823–839. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkailah AA, Alreshq RS, Muhammed AM, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4(4):CD012318.
   Google Scholar
• Mamas MA, et al. Health economic analysis of access site practice in England during changes in practice: insights from the British cardiovascular interventional society. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(5):e004482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann JT, et al. Right radial access for PTCA: a prospective study demonstrates reduced complications and hospital charges. J Invasive Cardiol. 1996;8(Suppl D):40D–44D.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell MD, Hong JA, Lee BY, et al. Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):454–462. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465–2476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YB, et al. Randomized comparison of radial versus femoral approach for patients with STEMI undergoing early PCI following intravenous thrombolysis. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(8):412–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409–1420. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roule V, Lemaitre A, Sabatier R, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;108(11):563–575. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat FA, Changal KH, Raina H, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty – A prospective, randomized comparison. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0457-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):e000035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattur GM, Almallouhi E, Lena JR, Spiotta AM. Illustrated guide to the transradial approach for neuroendovascular surgery: a step-by-Step description gleaned from over 500 cases at an early adopter single center. Op Neuros. 2020;19(2):181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catapano JS, Fredrickson VL, Fujii T, et al. Complications of femoral versus radial access in neuroendovascular procedures with propensity adjustment. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(6):611–615. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg JH, Sweid A, Hammoud B, et al. A comparative study of transradial versus transfemoral approach for flow diversion. Neuroradiology. 2021;63(8):1335–1343. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02672-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone JG, Zussman BM, Tonetti DA, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approaches for diagnostic cerebral angiography: a prospective, single-center, non-inferiority comparative effectiveness study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(10):993–998. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzsa Z, Csavajda Á, Nemes B, et al. Distal radial artery access for superficial femoral artery interventions. J Endovasc Ther. 2021;28(2):255–261. doi: 10.1177/1526602820963022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd W, Small CN, Goutnik M, et al. Cost comparison: evaluating transfemoral and transradial access for diagnostic cerebral angiography. Stroke. 2023;3(1):e000428.
   Google Scholar
• Catapano JS, Ducruet AF, Koester SW, et al. Propensity-adjusted cost analysis of radial versus femoral access for neuroendovascular procedures. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(8):752–754. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons RB, Caamaño IR, Chirife OS, et al. Transradial access for diagnostic angiography and interventional neuroradiology procedures: a four-year single-center experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020;26(4):506–513. doi: 10.1177/1591019920925711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalocar LAD, Doroszuk G, Goland J, et al. Transradial approach and its variations for neurointerventional procedures: literature review. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11(248):248. doi: 10.25259/SNI_366_2020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kallert L, et al. Achenbach S, ropers D, transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72(5):629–635. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna O, Sweid A, Mouchtouris N, et al. Radial artery catheterization for neuroendovascular procedures. Stroke. 2019;50(9):2587–2590. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satti SR, Vance AZ, Golwala SN, et al. Patient preference for transradial access over transfemoral access for cerebrovascular procedures. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. 2017;9(4):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao B-L, Xu G-Q, Wang Z-L, et al. Transradial stenting for carotid stenosis in patients with bovine type and type III aortic arch: experience in 28 patients. World Neurosurg. 2018;111:e661–e667. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oneissi M, Sweid A, Tjoumakaris S, et al. Access-site complications in transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures: a systematic review of incidence rates and management strategies. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;19(4):353–363. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar