921
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Real world treatment patterns, healthcare resource use and costs in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer by EGFR mutation type

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 219-229 | Received 07 Dec 2023, Accepted 22 Jan 2024, Published online: 13 Feb 2024

References

  • Cancer Stat Facts: Lung and Bronchus Cancer. National Cancer Institute: surveillance, epidemiology and end results program [accessed 2023 Jul]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html
  • Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv192–iv237. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy275.
  • Besse B, Adjei A, Baas P, et al. 2nd ESMO consensus conference on lung cancer: non-small-cell lung cancer first-line/second and further lines of treatment in advanced disease. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(8):1475–1484. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu123.
  • American Cancer Society. Lung cancer survival rates; [accessed 2023 April 5]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/lung-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html
  • Zhang Y-L, Yuan J-Q, Wang K-F, et al. The prevalence of EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(48):78985–78993. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12587.
  • Li WY, Zhao TT, Xu HM, et al. The role of EGFR mutation as a prognostic factor in survival after diagnosis of brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5331-z.
  • Fang S, Wang Z. EGFR mutations as a prognostic and predictive marker in non-small-cell lung cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014;8:1595–1611. doi: 10.2147/dddt.S69690.
  • Suda K, Mitsudomi T, Shintani Y, et al. Clinical impacts of EGFR mutation status: analysis of 5780 surgically resected lung cancer cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(1):269–276. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.041.
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: non-small cell lung cancer; [updated 2023 Apr 13; accessed 2023 Jul]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf
  • Graham RP, Treece AL, Lindeman NI, et al. Worldwide frequency of commonly detected EGFR mutations. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;142(2):163–167. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0579-CP.
  • Ullas B, Bivas B, Kumar P, et al. Differential clinicopathological features, treatments and outcomes in patients with exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R EGFR mutation-positive adenocarcinoma non-small-cell lung cancer. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023;10(1):e001492. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001492.
  • Sheng M, Wang F, Zhao Y, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations after tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;72(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1966-0.
  • Jiang H, Zhu M, Li Y, et al. Association between EGFR exon 19 or exon 21 mutations and survival rates after first‑line EGFR‑TKI treatment in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019;11(3):301–308. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1881.
  • Burnett H, Emich H, Carroll C, et al. Epidemiological and clinical burden of EGFR exon 20 insertion in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0247620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247620.
  • Vyse S, Huang PH. Targeting EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019;4(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0038-9.
  • Bonetti A, Giuliani J. Implications of drugs with rebate in Europe. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;3:100060. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100060.
  • National Cancer Institute. Financial burden of cancer care; [accessed 2023 May 3]. Available from: https://progressreport.cancer.gov/after/economic_burden
  • Vanderpoel J, Emond B, Ghelerter I, et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with EGFR-Mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-Line treatment in the United States: an insurance claims-based descriptive analysis. Pharmacoecon Open. 2023;7(4):617–626. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00407-0.
  • Albaba H, Lim C, Leighl NB. Economic considerations in the use of novel targeted therapies for lung cancer: review of current literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(12):1195–1209. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0563-8.
  • Shen C, Holguin RAP, Schaefer E, et al. Utilization and costs of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing and targeted therapy in Medicare patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07857-y.
  • Samuelsen C, Lim J, Golembesky A, et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with patients prescribed afatinib or erlotinib as first-line therapy for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in the United States. J Med Econ. 2020;23(1):48–53. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1645681.
  • Hou J, Li H, Ma S, et al. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: current status and perspectives. Biomark Res. 2022;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40364-022-00372-6.
  • Huse D, Russo P, Vasey J. Expanding the evidence base in outcomes research: linking electronic medical records and claims data. ISPOR Connect. 2013;19(3):5–7.
  • US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Medical care in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, seasonally adjusted. 2023 [accessed 2023 Aug 15]. Available from: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SAM
  • ASCO. Lung cancer - non-small cell: statistics; [accessed 2022 Sept 30]. Available from: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/lung-cancer-non-small-cell/statistics
  • Arcila ME, Nafa K, Chaft JE, et al. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(2):220–229. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-12-0620.
  • Oxnard GR, Lo PC, Nishino M, et al. Natural history and molecular characteristics of lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(2):179–184. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182779d18.
  • Tamura T, Kurishima K, Nakazawa K, et al. Specific organ metastases and survival in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. Jan 2015;3(1):217–221. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.410.
  • Carroll R, Bortolini M, Calleja A, et al. Trends in treatment patterns and survival outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Canadian population-based real-world analysis. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09342-5.
  • Chen Y, Deng J, Liu Y, et al. Analysis of metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(3):206–206. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2925.
  • Olivier T, Prasad V. Amivantamab and mobocertinib in exon 20 insertions EGFR mutant lung cancer, challenge to the current guidelines. Transl Oncol. 2022;23:101475. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101475.
  • Takeda Press Releases. Takeda provides update on EXKIVITY® (mobocertinib); [accessed 2023 Oct]. Available from: https://www.takeda.com/newsroom/newsreleases/2023/Takeda-Provides-Update-on-EXKIVITY-mobocertinib/
  • Riely GJ, Lovly CM, Messina CG, et al. Real-world utilization of EGFR TKI therapies and treatment outcomes in patients with advanced EGFR-sensitizing mutation-positive NSCLC. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_suppl):9062–9062. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.9062.
  • Chelabi S, Mignard X, Leroy K, et al. EGFR exon 20 insertion in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: survival and clinical efficacy of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and chemotherapy. Cancers. 2021;13(20):5132. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205132.
  • O'Sullivan DE, Jarada TN, Yusuf A, et al. Prevalence, treatment patterns, and outcomes of individuals with EGFR positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in a Canadian real-world setting: a comparison of exon 19 deletion, L858R, and exon 20 insertion EGFR mutation carriers. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(10):7198–7208. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100567.
  • Food and Drug Administration. Supplement approval: NDA 208065/S-008; [accessed 2023 Sept 21]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2018/208065Orig1s008ltr.pdf
  • Gibson AJW, Li H, D'Silva A, et al. Impact of number versus location of metastases on survival in stage IV M1b non-small cell lung cancer. Med Oncol. 2018;35(9):117. doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1182-8.
  • Yang W, Gao Y, Li X, et al. Postoperative survival of EGFR-TKI-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR 19 or 21 mutations: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1251-z.
  • Giuliani J, Bonetti A. Pharmacologic costs of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first-Line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: a review of pivotal phase III randomized controlled trials. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17(2):91–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.12.005.
  • Choi YC, Zhang D, Tyczynski JE. Comparison between health insurance claims and electronic health records (EHRs) for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient characteristics and treatment patterns: a retrospective cohort study. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2021;8(4):577–587. doi: 10.1007/s40801-021-00269-0.