From human rights to sentient rights

References

• Attfield, R., 1981. The good of trees. Journal of Value Inquiry, 15 (1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, 2006. Australian position statement on the export of livestock. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Available from: http://www.daff.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/146753/gov_position_statement.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• BBC News Online, 2009. EU seal ban challenged by Canada. BBC News Online, 27 July. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8171490.stm (accessed on 3 June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Beitz, C., 2009. The idea of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boonin, D., 2003. A defense of abortion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., 2004. Justice, legitimacy, and international relations: moral foundations for international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., 2006. Taking the human out of human rights. In: R. Martin and D. Reidy, eds. Rawls's Law of Peoples: a realistic utopia?. Oxford: Blackwell, 150–168.
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S., 2007. Global poverty and human rights: the case for positive duties. In: T. Pogge, ed. Freedom from poverty as a human right: who owes what to the very poor?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 275–302.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalieri, P., 2001. The animal question: why nonhuman animals deserve human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A., 2009. Do animals have an interest in liberty? Political Studies, 57 (3), 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2004. Minimalism about human rights: the most we can hope for? Journal of Political Philosophy, 12 (2), 190–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J.L., 2008. Rethinking human rights, democracy, and sovereignty in the age of globalization. Political Theory, 36 (4), 578–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979. Article 12.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2006. Article 20.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R., 2008. Well-being. In: E. N. Zalta, ed. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/well-being/ (accessed on 3 June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dershowitz, A., 2005. Rights from wrongs: a secular theory of the origins of rights. New York, NY: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Douzinas, C., 2000. The end of human rights: critical legal thought at the turn of the century. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R., 1977. Taking rights seriously. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R., 1996. Freedom's law: the moral reading of the American constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E.P., 1906. The criminal prosecution and capital punishment of animals. New York, NY: E.P. Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J., 1974. The rights of animals and unborn generations. In: W.T. Blackstone, ed. Philosophy and environmental crisis. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gearty, C., 2009. Is human rights speciesist? In: A. Linzey, ed. The link between animal abuse and human violence. Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press, 175–183.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J., 2008. On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H.L.A., 1967. Are there any natural rights? In: A. Quinton, ed. Political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H.L.A., 1982. Essays on Bentham: jurisprudence and political theory. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L.E., 1991. A morally deep world: an essay on moral significance and environmental ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, M., 1998. Rights without trimmings. In: M. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds and H. Steiner, eds. A debate over rights: philosophical enquiries. Oxford: Clarendon, 7–112.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J., 1988. The second treatise of government. In: P. Laslett, ed. Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 265–428.
   Google Scholar
• MacCormick, N., 1977. Rights in legislation. In: P.M.S. Hacker and J. Raz, eds. Law, morality, and society: essays in honour of H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon, 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Machan, T., 2002. Why human beings may use animals. Journal of Value Inquiry, 36 (1), 9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, J., 2003. The ethics of killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nobis, N., 2004. Carl Cohen's ‘kind' arguments for animal rights and against human rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21 (1), 43–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., 1998. Capabilities and human rights. Fordham Law Review, 66 (2), 273–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1993. Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, J., 1988. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, J., 1989. Liberating duties. Law and Philosophy, 8 (1), 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, J., 2010. Human rights without foundations. In: J. Tasioulas and S. Besson, eds. The philosophy of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 321–337.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, T., 1976. Feinberg on what sorts of beings can have rights. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 14 (4), 485–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, T., 2004. The case for animal rights. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A., 2008. Justice and the priority of politics to morality. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16 (2), 137–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, B., 2005. Human rights: problems with the foundationless approach. Social Theory and Practice, 31 (1), 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Shue, H., 1996. Basic rights: subsistence, affluence and US foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds, N.E., 1998. Rights at the cutting edge. In: M. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds and H. Steiner, eds. A debate over rights: philosophical enquiries. Oxford: Clarendon, 113–232.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P., 1979. Not for humans only: the place of nonhumans in environmental issues. In: K.E. Goodpaster and K.M. Sayre, eds. Ethics and problems of the 21st century. London: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P., 1986. All animals are equal. In: P. Singer, ed. Applied ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P., 1993. Practical ethics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, H., 1998. Working rights. In: M. Kramer, N.E. Simmonds and H. Steiner, eds. A debate over rights: philosophical enquiries. Oxford: Clarendon, 233–300.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, L.W., 1987. The moral foundation of rights. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, L.W., 1996. Welfare, happiness and ethics. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Tasioulas, J., 2002. Human rights, universality, and the values of personhood: retracing Griffin's steps. European Journal of Philosophy, 10 (1), 79–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasioulas, J., 2009. Are human rights essentially triggers for intervention? Philosophy Compass, 4 (6), 938–950.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P.W., 1986. Respect for nature: a theory of environmental ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989. Article 20.
   Google Scholar
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948. Article 16.
   Google Scholar
• Varner, G., 1998. In nature's interests? Interests, animal rights and environmental ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vlastos, G., 1962. Justice and equality. In: R. Brandt, ed. Social justice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 31–72.
   Google Scholar