The problem of stability and the ethos-based solution

References

• Atkinson, A.B., 1996. The case for a participation income. The political quarterly, 67 (1), 67–70.10.1111/poqu.1996.67.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, S., 2011. Should surfers be ostracized? Basic income, liberal neutrality, and the work ethos. Politics, philosophy & economics, 10 (4), 396–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, S., 2012. Basic income reconsidered: social justice, liberalism, and the demands of equality. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137015426
   Google Scholar
• Blattman, C., Fiala, N., and Martinez, S., 2014. Generating skilled employment in developing countries: experimental evidence from Uganda. The quarterly journal of economics, 129 (2), 697–752.10.1093/qje/qjt057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. and Gintis, H., 2011. A cooperative species: human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C., 2004. An apology for moral shame. Journal of political philosophy, 12 (2), 127–146.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00194.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casal, P., 2013. Occupational choice and the egalitarian ethos. Economics and philosophy, 29 (1), 3–20.10.1017/S0266267113000059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G.A., 2000. If you’re an egalitarian, how come you’re so rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G.A., 2008. Rescuing justice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2002. Taking people as they are? Philosophy & public affairs, 30 (4), 363–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beus, J., 2013. The stability of basic income. In: K. Widerquist, J.A. Noguera, Y. Vanderborght, and J. De Wispelaere, eds. Basic income: an anthology of contemporary research. Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell, 331–338.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I.G., 2000. Sharing America’s neighborhoods: the prospects for stable racial integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 1986. Comment on van der Veen and Van Parijs. Theory and Society, 15 (5), 709–721.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J., 2007. Explaining social behavior: more nuts and bolts for the social sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511806421
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. and Jegen, R., 2001. Motivation Crowding Theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (5), 589–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, S., 2008. Do declines in residential segregation mean stable neighborhood racial integration in metropolitan America? A research note. Social science research, 37 (3), 920–933.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gachter, S., 2005. Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In: B. Frey and A. Stutzer, eds. Psychology, and economics: a promising new cross-disciplinary field. Cambridge, MA: CESifo Seminar Series, 19–50.
   Google Scholar
• Groot, L., 2004. Basic income and unemployment. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-2726-0
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. and Helgesson, G., 2003. What is stability? Synthese, 136 (2), 219–235.10.1023/A:1024733424521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., 2010. A general theory of domination and justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579419.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lo Vuolo, R., 2012. Prospects and Challenges for the Basic Income Proposal in Latin America. Basic Income Studies, 7 (1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Maskivker, J., 2012. Self-realization and justice: a liberal-perfectionist defense of the right to freedom from employment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McClennen, E.F., 1989. Justice and the problem of stability. Philosophy & public affairs, 18 (1), 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, A., 2001. Rethinking work and income maintenance policy: promoting gender equality through a citizens’ basic income. Feminist economics, 7 (1), 97–118.10.1080/13545700010022721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, L., ed., 1997. The new paternalism: supervisory approaches to poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Midtgaard, S., 2008. Rawlsian stability and basic income. Basic income studies, 3 (2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, B. and Van Schoelandt, C., 2014. Political liberalism, ethos justice, and gender equality. Law and philosophy, 33 (1), 75–104.10.1007/s10982-013-9174-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., 2004. Hiding from humanity: shame, disgust, and the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osterkamp, R., 2013. The basic income grant pilot project in Namibia: a critical assessment. Basic income studies, 8 (1), 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The journal of economic perspectives, 14 (3), 137–158.10.1257/jep.14.3.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 2005. Policies that crowd out reciprocity and collective action. In: H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, and E. Fehr, eds. Moral sentiments and material interests: the foundations of cooperation in economic life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 253–275.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C., 2004. Democratizing citizenship: some advantages of a basic income. Politics & society, 32 (1), 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R.M., 2010. The dynamics of persuasion: communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, E., 2000. Law and social norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raventós, D., 2007. Basic income: the material conditions of freedom. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1999. A theory of justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segall, S., 2005. Unconditional welfare benefits and the principle of reciprocity. Politics, philosophy & economics, 4 (3), 331–354.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G., 2002. Beyond the new paternalism: basic security as equality. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Titelbaum, M., 2008. What would a Rawlsian ethos of justice look like? Philosophy & public affairs, 36 (3), 289–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Donselaar, G., 2008. The right to exploit: Parasitism, scarcity, and basic income. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P., 1995. Real freedom for all: what (if anything) can justify capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P., 2003. Difference principles. In: S. Freeman, ed. The Cambridge companion to Rawls. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 200–240.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., 2003. The civic minimum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198295057.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Widerquist, K., 1999. Reciprocity and the guaranteed income. Politics and society, 33 (3), 386–401.
   Google Scholar
• Widerquist, K., 2013. Independence, propertylessness, and basic income: a theory of freedom as the power to say no. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137313096
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J., 1998. Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos. Philosophy & public affairs, 27 (2), 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar