Populism and technocracy: opposites or complements?

References

• Albertazzi, D. and McDonnell, D., 2008. Twenty-first century populism: the specter of Western European democracy. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Arditi, B., 2005. Populism as an internal periphery of democratic politics. In: F. Panizza, ed. Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso, 72–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V., 2014. Crisis of political parties and representative democracies: rethinking parties in associational, experimentalist governance. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 17 (3), 350–376.10.1080/13698230.2014.886380
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V. and Bonotti, M., 2014. Introduction: parties, partisanship and political theory. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 17 (3), 253–266.
   Google Scholar
• Bonotti, M., 2014. Partisanship and public reason. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 17 (3), 314–331.10.1080/13698230.2014.886381
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M., 1981. Populism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M., 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political studies, 47 (1), 2–16.10.1111/post.1999.47.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, M., 1954. Political parties. Their organization and activity in the modern state. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, A., 2008. The force of the example: explorations in the paradigm of judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2009. Democracy and expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282838.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, C. 2010. Forget left and right. The real divide is technocrats versus populists’. Reuters, 5 November.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F., 2014. Political order and political decay from the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E. and Ionescu, G., 1969. Populism: its meaning and national characteristics. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R., 2008. Innovating democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547944.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Goulard, S. and Monti, M., 2012. De la Démocratie en Europe. Voir Plus Loin [On democracy in Europe: seeing further]. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, B. and Casaleggio, G., 2011. Siamo in Guerra. Per una nuova politica [We're at war: for a new politics]. Milano: Chiarelettere.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R., 1969. The idea of a party system. The rise of legitimate opposition in the United States, 1780–1840. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias, P. and Rivero, J., 2014. Conversacion con Pablo Iglesias [Conversations with Pablo Iglesias]. Madrid: Turpial.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R.S. and Mair, P., 1995. Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party politics, 1 (1), 5–28.10.1177/1354068895001001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsen, H., 2013. The essence and value of democracy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kenneally, I., 2009. Technocracy and populism. The New Atlantis, Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Kircheimer, O., 1969. The transformation of Western European party systems. In: J. LaPalombara and M. Weiner, eds. Political parties and political development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 177–200.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., 2008. Populism: What’s in a name? In: F. Panizza, ed. Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso, 32–49.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, M., 2011. Four scenarios for the reinvention of Europe. European Council of Foreign Relations, London. Available from: http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR43_REINVENTION_OF_EUROPE_ESSAY_AW1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Le Pen, M., 2012. Pour que vive la France [So that France can Thrive]. Paris: Grancher Depot.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S., 1967. Party systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, C., 1981. Fictitious bonds … of wealth and law: on the theory and practice of interest representation. In: S. Berger, ed. Organizing interests in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 27–61.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P., 2014. On parties, party systems and democracy. Essex: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G., 1996. Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203439197
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G., 2005. Dilemmas of European integration: the ambiguities and pitfalls of integration by stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199274304.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B., 1997. The principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659935
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, D. and Valbruzzi, M., 2013. Defining and classifying technocrat-led and technocratic governments. In: Conference, European Union Studies Association Conference, 9–11 May, Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Melenchon, J.-L., 2014. L’ère du people [The age of the people]. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., 2004. The populist Zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39 (4), 542–563.10.1111/goop.2004.39.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muirhead, R., 2006. A defence of party spirit. Perspectives on politics, 4 (4), 713–727.
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, R. and Rosenblum, N., 2006. A defence of party spirit. Perspectives on politics, 4 (4), 713–727.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J.-W. 2013. We the people. On populism and democracy. Lecture, Institute for Human Sciences of the University of Vienna. Available from: http://www.iwm.at/events/event/iwm-lecture-in-human-sciences-we-the-people-on-populism-and-democracy-i/
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C., 2013. Europe entrapped. Modern law review, 19 (5), 595–611.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.J., 1968. The social contract. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J.J., 1997. The Social Contract and other political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., 1998. Le Peuple introvable: Histoire de la representation democratique en France [The Absent People: A History of Democratic Representation in France]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., 2008. Counter-democracy. Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., 2011. Democratic legitimacy. impartiality. Reflexivity. Proximity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, N., 2008. On the side of the angels. An appreciation of parties and partisanship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G., 1976. Parties and party systems. A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F., 1999. Governing in Europe: effective and democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V., 2006. Democracy in Europe: the EU and national polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266975.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C., 1921. The concept of the political. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C., 1923. The crisis of parliamentary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P., 2000. Populism. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N., 2014. Democracy disfigured. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674726383
   Google Scholar
• White, J., 2014. Transnational partisanship: idea and practice. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 17 (3), 377–400.10.1080/13698230.2014.886386
   Google Scholar
• White, J. and Ypi, L., 2010. Rethinking the modern prince: partisanship and the democratic ethos. Political studies, 58 (4), 809–828.10.1111/post.2010.58.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. and Ypi, L., 2011. On partisan political justification. American political science review, 105 (2), 381–396.10.1017/S0003055411000074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. 2011. Technocracy and populism. Dissent Magazine, 22 October. Available from: www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/technocracy-and-populism.
   Google Scholar