References
- Biggar, N., 2011. Behaving in public: how to do Christian ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans.
- Boettcher, J.W., 2005. Public reason and religion. In: T. Brooks and F. Freyehagen, eds. The legacy of John Rawls. London: Continuum, 124–151.
- Gaus, G., 2014. The turn to a political liberalism. In: J. Mandle and D.A. Reidy, eds. A companion to Rawls. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 235–250.
- Hollenbach, D., 2002. The common good and Christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606380
- Macedo, S., 2010. Why public reason? Citizens’ reasons and the constitution of the public sphere SSRN e-library. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1664085 [Accessed 9 June 2014].
- Neal, P., 2009. Is political liberalism hostile to religion? In: S.P. Young, ed. Reflections on Rawls: an assessment of his legacy. Farnham: Ashgate, 153–175.
- Quong, J., 2011. Liberalism without perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Rawls, J., 2005. Political liberalism. Expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Schwartzman, M., 2011. The sincerity of public reason. Journal of political philosophy, 19 (4), 375–398.10.1111/jopp.2011.19.issue-4
- Schwartzman, M., 2012. The ethics of reasoning from conjecture. Journal of moral philosophy, 9 (4), 521–544.10.1163/174552412X628931
- Van Parijs, P., 2003. Difference principles. In: S. Freeman, ed. The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200–240.
- Weithman, P.J., 2010. Why political liberalism? On John Rawls’s political turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Weithman, P.J., forthcoming. Legitimacy and the project of Rawls’s political liberalism. In: T. Brooks and M. Nussbaum, eds. Rawls’s political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Available from: http://www3.nd.edu/~pweithma/professional_website/My%20Papers/Legitimacy%20and%20the%20Project%20of%20John%20Rawlss%20Political%20Liberalism.pdf
- Wolterstorff, N., 1997. The role of religion in decision and discussion of political issues. In: R. Audi and N. Wolterstorff, eds. Religion in the public square: the place of religious convictions in political debate. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 67–120.
- Zoffoli, E., 2012. The place of comprehensive doctrines in political liberalism: On some common misgivings about the subject and function of the overlapping consensus. Res Publica, 18 (4), 351–366.10.1007/s11158-012-9197-z