Two concepts of justice – and of its scope

References

• Abizadeh, A., 2007. Cooperation, pervasive impact, and coercion: on the scope (not site) of distributive justice. Philosophy and public affairs, 35 (4), 318–358.10.1111/papa.2007.35.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abizadeh, A., 2010. Democratic legitimacy and state coercion: a reply to David Miller. Political theory, 38 (1), 121–130.10.1177/0090591709348192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., 2013. The fundamental disagreement between luck egalitarians and relational egalitarians. Canadian journal of philosophy, 40 (supp. 1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, B., 1982. Humanity and justice in global perspective. In: J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman, eds. Ethics, economics, and the law: NOMOS XXIV. New York: New York University Press, 232–233.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C. and Valentini, L., 2009. Egalitarian challenges to global egalitarianism, a critique. Review of international studies, 35, 485–512.10.1017/S0260210509008626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beitz, C., 2009. The idea of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572458.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., 1990. Justice as reciprocity versus subject-centred justice. Philosophy and public affairs, 19 (3), 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., 2004. Justice, legitimacy and the use of force. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S., 2005. Justice beyond borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S., 2008. Distributive justice and the state. Political Studies, 56, 487–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2004. Minimalism about human rights. Journal of political philosophy, 12, 190–213.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00197.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2006. Is there a human right to democracy? In: C. Sypnowich, ed. The egalitarian conscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 226–248.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R., 2011. Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A., 2011. The distributive justice of a global basic structure: a category mistake? Political philosophy and economics, 10 (1), 46–65.10.1177/1470594X10396302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., 2006a. The law of peoples, social cooperation, human rights, and distributive justice. Social philosophy and policy, 23 (1), 29–68.10.1017/S026505250606002X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., 2006b. Distributive justice and the law of peoples. In: R. Martin and D.A. Reidy, eds. Rawls’s law of peoples: a realistic utopia?. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., 2013. The social and institutional bases of distributive justice. In: G. Brock, ed. Cosmopolitanism versus non-cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 198–221.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678426.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., 2011. Cosmopolitan overflow. The Monist, 94 (4), 584–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., 2012. From global poverty to global equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199639717.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• James, A., 2005. Constructing justice for existing practice: rawls and the status quo. Philosophy and public affairs, 33, 281–316.10.1111/papa.2005.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamm, F., 2007. Intricate ethics: rights, responsibilities, and permissible harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189698.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lister, A., 2013. Reciprocity, relationships, and distributive justice. Social theory and practice, 39 (1), 70–94.10.5840/soctheorpract20133919
   Google Scholar
• Meckled-Garcia, S., 2008. On the very idea of cosmopolitan justice: constructivism and international agency. Journal of political philosophy, 16 (3), 245–271.10.1111/jopp.2008.16.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckled-Garcia, S., 2013. Giving up the goods: rethinking the human right to subsistence, institutional justice, and imperfect duties. Journal of applied philosophy, 30 (1), 73–87.10.1111/japp.2013.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckled-Garcia, S., 2014. What comes first, democracy or human rights? Critical review of social and political philosophy, 17 (6), 681–688.10.1080/13698230.2014.930783
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., 2010. Globalizing justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, L., 2000. Moral demands in non-ideal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D., 2002. Equality or priority. In: M. Clayton and A. Williams, eds. The ideal of equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan, 81–125.
   Google Scholar
• Quong, J., 2011. Left libertarianism: Rawlsian not luck-egalitarian. Journal of political philosophy, 19, 64–89.10.1111/jopp.2011.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1971/1999. A theory of justice. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1993. Political liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 2001. Justice as fairness: a restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ronzoni, M., 2009. The global order: a case for background injustice? A practice-dependent account. Philosophy and public affairs, 37 (3), 229–256.10.1111/papa.2009.37.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A., 2007. Global justice, reciprocity, and the state. Philosophy and public affairs, 35, 3–39.10.1111/papa.2007.35.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K.C., 2004. Justice without borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490385
   Google Scholar
• Temkin, L., 1993. Inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar