No right to unilaterally claim your territory: on the consistency of Kantian statism

References

• Bohman, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M., eds., 1997. Perpetual peace: Essays on Kant’s cosmopolitan ideal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., 2004. Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: Moral foundations for international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carens, J., 2013. The ethics of immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T., 2006. A democratic theory of territory and some puzzles about global democracy. Journal of social philosophy, 37 (1), 81–107.10.1111/josp.2006.37.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Flikschuh, K., 2000. Kant and modern political philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487187
   Google Scholar
• Flikschuh, K., 2010. Kant’s sovereignty dilemma: A contemporary analysis. Journal of political philosophy, 18 (4), 469–493.10.1111/jopp.2010.18.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A. and Maliks, R., 2013. Kantian theory and human rights. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, L.-P., 2010. Kant on the right to freedom: A defense. Ethics, 120 (4), 791–819.10.1086/653687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruschka, J. and Byrd, S., 2010. Kant’s “doctrine of right”: A commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I., 1991. Political writings. H. Reiss, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I., 1996. Practical philosophy. P. Guyer and A. Wood, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladenson, R., 1980. In defense of a Hobbesian conception of law. Philosophy & public affairs, 9 (2), 134–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J., 1988. John Locke: Two treatises of government. P. Laslett, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810268
   Google Scholar
• Meisels, T., 2005. Territorial Rights. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., 2010b. Against global democracy. In: K. O’Neill and S. Breen, eds. After the nation. Critical reflections on post-nationalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 141–161.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., 2011. Property and territory: Locke, Kant, and Steiner. Journal of political philosophy, 19 (1), 90–109.10.1111/jopp.2011.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., 2012. Territorial rights: Concept and justification. Political studies, 60 (2), 252–268.10.1111/post.2012.60.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M., 2015. A political theory of territory. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190222246.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Niesen, P., 2012. Kosmopolitismus in einem Land [Cosmopolitanism in one country]. In: P. Niesen, ed. Transnationale Gerechtigkeit und Demokratie [Transnational justice and democracy]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 311–339.
   Google Scholar
• Nine, C., 2012. Global justice and territory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580217.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D., 2014. Cosmopolitanism in one country: Political legitimacy and the democratic constitutional state. APSA Annual Meeting Paper. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2454276 [Accessed 1 February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, C., 2004. The modern state. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T., 2011. Allowing the poor to share the earth. Journal of moral philosophy, 8 (3), 335–352.10.1163/174552411X588982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripstein, A., 2009. Force and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674054516
   Google Scholar
• Sandelind, Clara, 2015. Territorial rights and open borders. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 18 (5), 487–507.10.1080/13698230.2013.864796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, W., 2014. Cosmopolitanism and the world state. Review of international studies, 40 (3), 419–441.10.1017/S0260210513000417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidtz, D., 1990. When is original appropriation required? Monist, 73 (4), 504–518.10.5840/monist19907342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, A.J., 1994. Original-acquisition justifications of private property. Social philosophy and policy, 11 (2), 63–84.10.1017/S026505250000443X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, A.J., 2001. On the territorial rights of states. Nous, 35 (1), 300–326.10.1111/nous.2001.35.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A.J., 2013. Democratic authority and the boundary problem. Ratio juris, 26 (3), 326–357.10.1111/raju.2013.26.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, H., 2005. Territorial justice and global redistribution. In: G. Brock and H. Brighouse, eds. The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 28–38.10.1017/CBO9780511614743
   Google Scholar
• Stilz, A., 2009. Why do states have territorial rights? International theory, 1 (2), 185–213.10.1017/S1752971909000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilz, A., 2011a. Nations, states, and territory. Ethics, 121 (3), 572–601.10.1086/658937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilz, A., 2011b. Liberal loyalty. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stilz, A., 2013. Occupancy rights and the wrong of removal. Philosophy & public affairs, 41 (4), 324–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulas, L., 2015. Transforming (but not transcending) the state system? On statist cosmopolitanism. Critical review of international social and political philosphy, online first. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13698230.2015.1048071 [Accessed 1 February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vossen, B., 2009. What counts as original appropriation? Politics, philosophy & economics, 8 (4), 355–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vossen, B., 2015. Imposing duties and original appropriation. Journal of political philosophy, 23 (1), 64–85.10.1111/jopp.2015.23.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J., 1993. Special ties and natural duties. Philosophy & public affairs, 22 (1), 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J., 2011. The principle of proximity. NYU School of Law Public Law Research Paper 11-08. Available from: http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/255 [Accessed 1 February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Ypi, L., 2008. Statist cosmopolitanism. Journal of political philosophy, 16 (1), 48–71.10.1111/jopp.2008.16.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ypi, L., 2013a. Territorial rights and exclusion. Philosophy compass, 8 (3), 241–253.10.1111/phco.2013.8.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Ypi, L., 2013b. Cosmopolitanism without if and without but. In: G. Brock, ed. Cosmopolitanism versus non-cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–88.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678426.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ypi, L., 2014. A permissive theory of territorial rights. European journal of philosophy, 22 (2), 288–312.10.1111/ejop.2014.22.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar