2,184
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Ethics, morality and the case for realist political theory

&

References

  • Baderin, A. (2014). Two forms of realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 13, 132–153.10.1177/1474885113483284
  • Erman, E., & Moller, N. (2015). Political legitimacy in the real normative world: The priority of morality and the autonomy of the political. British Journal of Political Science, 45, 215–233.10.1017/S0007123413000148
  • Freeden, M. (2012). Interpretative realism and prescriptive realism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 17(1), 1–11.10.1080/13569317.2012.651883
  • Galston, W. (2010). Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9, 385–411.10.1177/1474885110374001
  • Geuss, R. (1994). Nietzsche and genealogy. European Journal of Philosophy, 2, 274–292.10.1111/ejop.1994.2.issue-3
  • Geuss, R. (1997). Nietzsche and morality. European Journal of Philosophy, 5, 1–20.10.1111/ejop.1997.5.issue-1
  • Geuss, R. (2005a). Introduction. Outside ethics (pp. 1–10). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2005b). Liberalism and its discontents. Outside Ethics (pp. 11–28). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2005c). Thucydides, Nietzsche and Williams. In Outside Ethics (pp. 40–66). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835515
  • Geuss, R. (2010a). Bourgeois philosophy and criticism. In Politics and the imagination (pp. 167–186). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2010b). On the Very idea of a metaphysics of right. Politics and the imagination (pp. 43–60). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R., (2010c). Preface. In Politics and the imagination (pp. vii–xvi). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2010d). Richard Rorty at Princeton – Personal reflections. In Politics and the imagination (pp. 151–163). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2014a). A note on lying. In A World without Why (pp. 135–143). Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400848485
  • Geuss, R. (2014b). Did Williams do Ethics? In A World without Why (pp. 175–194). Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400848485
  • Geuss, R. (2014c). Marxism and the ethos of the twentieth century. In A World without Why (pp. 45–67). Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400848485
  • Geuss, R. (2014d). Must criticism be constructive? In A World without Why (pp. 68–90). Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400848485
  • Geuss, R. (2014e). The loss of meaning on the left. A World without Why (pp. 91–111). Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400848485
  • Geuss, R. (2014f). Wisdom of Oedipus and the Idea of a Moral Cosmos. In A World without Why (pp. 195–222). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2016). The idea of a critical theory. Retrieved February 23, 2016, from http://thepointmag.com/2014/politics/idea-critical-theory.
  • Hall, E. (2014). Contingency, confidence and liberalism in the political thought of Bernard Williams. Social Theory and Practice, 40, 545–569.10.5840/soctheorpract201440433
  • Hall, E. (2015). Bernard Williams and the basic legitimation demand: A defence. Political Studies, 63, 466–480.10.1111/1467-9248.12070
  • Hall, E. (in press). How to do realistic political theory (and why you might want to). European Journal of Political Theory doi:10.1177/1474885115577820
  • Krishna, N. 2016. Add your own egg. Retrieved February 17, 2016, from http://thepointmag.com/2016/examined-life/add-your-own-egg
  • Nye, S. (2015). Real politics and metaethical baggage. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18, 1083–1100.10.1007/s10677-015-9590-8
  • Owen, D. (in press). Realism in ethics and politics: Bernard Williams, political theory and the critique of morality. In M. Sleat (Ed.), Politics recovered: Essays on realist political theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Philp, M. (2012). Realism without illusions. Political Theory, 40, 629–649.10.1177/0090591712451723
  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804397
  • Rossi, E., & Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in normative political theory. Philosophy Compass, 9, 689–701.10.1111/phc3.v9.10
  • Runciman, D. (2012). What is realistic political philosophy? Metaphilosophy, 43, 58–70.10.1111/meta.2012.43.issue-1-2
  • Sagar, P. (2016). From scepticism to liberalism? Bernard Williams, the foundations of liberalism and political realism Political Studies, 64, 368–384.
  • Scheuerman, W. (2013). The realist revival in political philosophy, or: Why new is not always improved. International Politics, 50, 798–814.10.1057/ip.2013.39
  • Sleat, M. (2014). Legitimacy in realist thought: Between moralism and realpolitik. Political Theory, 42, 314–337.10.1177/0090591714522250
  • Sleat, M. (2016). Realism, liberalism and non-ideal theory. Or, are there two ways to do realistic political theory? Political Studies, 64, 27–41.10.1111/1467-9248.12152
  • Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass, 7, 654–665.
  • Williams, B. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. In Utilitarianism: For and against (pp. 75–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Williams, B. (1981). Persons, character and morality. In Moral Luck (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165860
  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana.
  • Williams, B. (1993a). Morality: An introduction to ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107325869
  • Williams, B. (1993b). Shame and necessity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Williams, B. (1995a). Moral luck: A postscript. In Making sense of humanity (pp. 241–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621246
  • Williams, B. (1995b). What does intuitionism imply? In Making sense of humanity (pp. 182–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621246
  • Williams, B. (1996). History, morality, and the test of reflection. In C. Korsgaard (Ed.), The sources of normativity (pp. 210–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554476
  • Williams, B. (2001). From freedom to liberty: The construction of a political value. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30, 3–26.10.1111/papa.2001.30.issue-1
  • Williams, B. (2002). Truth and Truthfulness. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams, B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument, (ed. Geoffrey Hawthorn). Oxford: Princetion University Press.
  • Williams, B. (2006). Philosophy as humanistic discipline. In A. Moore (Ed.), Philosophy as a humanistic discipline (pp. 180–199). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams, B. (2007a). Introduction to the gay science. In M. Burnyeat (Ed.), The sense of the past: Essays in the history of philosophy (pp. 311–324). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams, B. (2007b). Nietzsche’s minimalist moral psychology. In M. Burnyeat (Ed.), The sense of the past: Essays in the history of philosophy (pp. 299–310). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams, B. (2007c). There are many kinds of eyes. In M. Burnyeat (Ed.), The sense of the past: Essays in the history of philosophy (pp. 325–330). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams, B. (2007d). Unbearable suffering. In M. Burnyeat (Ed.), The sense of the past: Essays in the history of philosophy (pp. 331–340). Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Williams, B. (2014a). Review of ‘Nietzsche on Tragedy, by M.S. Silk and J.P. Stern; Nietzsche: A Critical Life, by Ronald Hayman; Nietzsche, vol. 1. The Will to Power as Art, by Martin Heidegger in his Essays and Reviews, 1959–2002, 179–183.
  • Williams, B. (2014b). The need to be sceptical. Essays and reviews: 1959–2002 (pp. 311–317). Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.