Political realism meets civic republicanism

References

• Bell, D. A. (2015). The China model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400865505
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. (2007). Political constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490187
   Google Scholar
• Besson, S., & Marti, J. L. (2008). Law and republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy across borders: From demos to demoi. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., & Pettit, P. (1990). Not just deserts: A republican theory of criminal justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., Charlesworth, H., & Soares, A. (2012). Networked governance of freedom and Tyranny: Peace in East Timor. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Pettit, P. (2004). The economy of esteem: An essay on civil and political society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brugger, B. (1999). Republican theory in political thought. New York, NY: Macmillan.10.1057/9780333982303
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing justice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674029651
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (2002). Sovereign virtue revisited. Ethics, 113, 116–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (2007). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. (2002). Contexts of justice: Political philosophy beyond liberalism and communitarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2001). History and illusion in politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2005). Outside ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835515
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2010). Politics and the imagination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (1995). Political ideals and political practice. British Journal of Political Science, 44, 635–646.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1995). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halldenius, L. (2001). Liberty revisited. Lund: Bokbox.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, A., & Stemplowska, Z. (2012). Theory, ideal theory and the theory of ideals. Political Studies Review, 10, 48–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honohan, I. (2002). Civic republicanism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203460894
   Google Scholar
• Honohan, I., & Jennings, J. (Eds.). (2006). Republicanism in theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1875). Of the independence of parliament. In T. H. Green & T. H. Grose (Eds.), Hume’s philosophical works. London.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, J.-H., & Jenco, L. (2014). Republicanism in Northeast Asia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C. (2008). Critical republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550210.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, C., & Maynor, J. (Eds.). (2007). Republicanism and political theory. Oxford: Blac kwell.
   Google Scholar
• List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F. (2010). A general theory of domination and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579419.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, F., & Pettit, P. (2009). Neo-republicanism: A normative and institutional research program. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGilvray, E. (2011). The invention of market freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511842351
   Google Scholar
• Mandeville, B. (1731). Free thoughts on religion, the church and national happiness. London.
   Google Scholar
• Marti, J. L., & Pettit, P. (2010). A political philosophy in public life: Civic republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGeer, V., & Pettit, P. (2015). The hard problem of responsibility. In D. Shoemaker (Ed.), Oxford studies in agency and responsibility (Vol. 3, pp. 160–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744832.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• McKean, B. (2013). What makes a fiction inconvenient? On the political realisms of Raymond Geuss and Bernard Williams. Political Theory Workshop. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Niederbeger, A., & Schink, P. (Eds.). (2012). Republican democracy: Liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2005). The domination complaint. Nomos, 86, 87–117.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017428
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2013). Two republican traditions. In A. Niederbeger & P. Schink (Eds.), Republican democracy: Liberty, law and politics (pp. 169–204). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2014a). Just freedom: A Moral compass for a complex world. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2014b). Republicanism across cultures. In J.-H. Kwak & L. Jenco (Eds.), Republicanism in Northeast Asia (pp. 15–38). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2015). Justice, social and political. In D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, & S. Wall (Eds.), Oxford studies in political philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. 9–35).
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The machiavellian moment: Florentine political theory and the atlantic republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, R. (1991). Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. (2002). Democratic autonomy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E., & Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in normative political theory. Philosophy Compass, 9, 689–701.10.1111/phc3.v9.10
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1983). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35, 153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J. (2009). Ideal and non-ideal theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 38, 5–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. (1978). The foundations of modern political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S. (2005). Liberty beyond neo-liberalism. London: Macmillan Palgrave.10.1057/9780230513587
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southwood, N. (2017). Does ‘ought’ imply ‘feasible’? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 45.
   Google Scholar
• Valentini, L. (2009). On the apparent paradox of ideal theory. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 332–355.10.1111/jopp.2009.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass, 7, 654–664.10.1111/phco.2012.7.issue-9
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelderen, M., & Skinner, Q. (2002). Republicanism: A shared European heritage, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeule, A. (2011). The system of the constitution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viroli, M. (2002). Republicanism. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2013). Political political theory: An inaugural lecture. Journal of Political Philosophy, 21, 1–23.10.1111/jopp.2013.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1981). Philosophy and democracy. Political Theory, 9, 379–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock, D., & Nadeau, C. (Eds.). (2004). Republicanism: History, theory and practice. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., & Leighton, D. (Eds.). (2008). Building a citizen society: The emerging politics of republican democracy. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar