The mirage of mark-to-market: distributive justice and alternatives to capital taxation

References

• Andrews, W. D. (1983). The achilles’ heel of the comprehensive income tax. In C. E. Walker & M. A. Bloomfield (Eds.), New directions in federal tax policy for the 1980s (pp. 280-285). Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3), 265-290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankman, J., & Shaviro, D. (2015). Piketty in America: A tale of two literatures. Tax Law Review, 68, 477–485.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet, O., Bono, P.-H., Chapelle, G., & Wasmer, E. (2014) Does housing capital contribute to inequality? A comment on Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century. Sciences Po Economics Discussion Paper 7. Retrieved from https://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/30nstiku669glbr66l6n7mc2oq/resources/2014-07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2016). Introduction. In P. Booth (Ed.), Taxation, government spending and economic growth (pp. 1–23). London: Institute of Economic Affairs. Retrieved from http://proxy.uqtr.ca/login.cgi?action=login&u=uqtr&db=ebsco&ezurl=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1441440
   Google Scholar
• Boudreaux, D. (1994). Schumpeter and Kirzner on competition and equilibrium. In P. J. Boettke & D. L. Prychitko (Eds.), The market process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian economics (pp. 52–61). Aldershot, Hants, England; Brookfield, Vt., USA: E. Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreaux, D. (2017). Antitrust and competition from a market-process perspective. In T. Zywicki & P. Boettke (Eds.), Research handbook on Austrian law and economics (pp. 278–295). Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113106
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, G. M. (1986). Tax loopholes as original sin: Lessons from tax history. Villanova Law Review, 31, 1763–1785.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G. (2018). Striving for the middle ground. In M. O’Neill & S. Orr (Eds.), Taxation: Philosophical perspectives (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199609222.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brown, F. B. (1996). ‘Complete’ accrual taxation. San Diego Law Review, 33, 1559–1680.
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K. (2016). Eliminate the mortgage interest deduction or tax imputed rent? Leveling the real-estate playing field. Cityscape, 16(1), 215–218. Housing, Contexts, and the Well-Being of Children and Youth.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Congleton, R. D. (1998). Politics by principle, not interest: Toward nondiscriminatory democracy. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callan, T. (1992). Taxing imputed income from owner-occupation: Distributional implications of alternative packages. Fiscal Studies, 13(4), 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, P. (2009) Urban containment, housing affordability and price stability-irreconcilable goals. SERC Policy Papers SERCPP004, Monograph. London: Spatial Economics Research Centre. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59240/
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, N. B., & Schenk, D. H. (1992). Taxation without realization: A ‘revolutionary’ approach to ownership. Tax Law Review, 47, 725–814.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amico, D. (2015). Spontaneous order. In C. J. Coyne & P. J. Boettke (Eds.), The oxford handbook of Austrian economics. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811762.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199811762-e-6
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, P., & Saez, E. (2011). The case for a progressive tax: From basic research to policy recommendation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 165–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietsch, P. (2015). Catching Capital: The Ethics of Tax Competition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietsch, P. (2018). The state and tax competition. In M. O’Neill & S. Orr (Eds.), Taxation: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 203-223). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietsch, P., & Rixen, T. (2014). Tax competition and global background justice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(2), 150–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (2014). Inequality and the 1 %. London New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, D. (2010). The myth of realization: Mark- to- market taxation of publicly - traded securities. Floria Tax Review, 10(5), 375–407.
   Google Scholar
• Engler, M. L. (2003). A progressive consumption tax for individuals: An alternative hybrid approach. Alabama Law Review, 54(4), 1205–1249.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. A., & Henderson, T. M. (2011). Do accounting rules matter - the dangerous allure of mark to market. The Journal of Corporation Law, 36(3), 513–549.
   Google Scholar
• Faig, M., & Shum, P. (2002). Portfolio choice in the presence of personal illiquid projects. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 303–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaus, G. F. (2012). The order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, M. P. (1994). The effects of price volatility and strategic trading under realization, expected return and retrospective taxation. Tax Law Review, 49, 209–268.
   Google Scholar
• Haig, R. M. (1921). The federal income tax. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, D. (1997). Saving the income tax: An agenda for research. Tax Notes, 77, 967–977.
   Google Scholar
• Hasen, D. (2017). Accretion-based progressive wealth taxation. Accretion-Based Progressive Wealth Taxation, 20(4), 277–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heen, M. L. (1994). An alternative approach to the taxation of employment discrimination recoveries under federal civil rights statutes: Income from human capital, realization, and nonrecognition. North Carolina Law Review, 72(3), 549–618.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. (2001). reprint Value and capital: An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory. 2nd. Clarendon Paperbacks Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, T. (2008). Robbing the rich to give to the poor: Abolishing realization and adopting mark-to-market taxation. Thomas M Cooley Law Review, 25, 529–554.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplow, L. (2011). The theory of taxation and public economics. N.J.; Woodstock: Princeton University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400839223
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. (1978). Entrepreneurship, entitlement, and economic justice. Eastern Economic Journal, 4(1), 9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. (1996). The meaning of market process: Essays in the development of modern Austrian economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. (2011). Market theory and the price system. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. (2013). Competition and entrepreneurship. Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kwall, J. L. (2011). When should asset appreciation be taxed?: The case for a disposition standard of realization. Indiana Law Journal, 86(1), 77–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Cava, G. D. (2016, November 2) Housing prices, mortgage interest rates and the rising share of capital income in the United States. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2814142
   Google Scholar
• Land, S. B. (1996). Defeating deferral: A proposal for retrospective taxation. Tax Law Review, 52, 45–118.
   Google Scholar
• Logue, K., & Selmrod, J. (2008). Genes as tags: The tax implications of widely available genetic information. National Tax Journal, 61(4). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41790483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, D. (2013). Political inequality and the ‘Super-Rich’: Their money or (some of) their political rights. Res Publica (liverpool, England), 19(2), 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Mankiw, N. G., & Weinzierl, M. (2010). The optimal taxation of height: A case study of utilitarian income redistribution. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25760055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffery, E. J. (2005). A new understanding of tax. Michigan Law Review, 103, 807-938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, J. E. Institute for Fiscal Studies. (eds). (1978). The structure and reform of direct taxation: Report. London; Boston: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, J. E. (1984). Full employment, new technologies and the distribution of income. Journal of Social Policy, 13(02), 129-146.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, J. E. (2013). The just economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Menger, C. (1985). Investigations into the method of the social sciences, with special reference to economics. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mestmäcker, E. J. (2007). Alegal theory without law: Posner v.Hayek on economic analysis of lawTübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Mirrlees, J. A., & Adam, S. Institute for Fiscal Studies (Great Britain). (eds). (2011). Tax by design: The mirrlees review. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Driscoll, G. P., & Rizzo, M. J. (2015). Austrian economics re-examined: The economics of time and ignorance. Expanded edition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. (2009). Liberty, equality and property-owning democracy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(3), 379–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. (2012). Free (and Fair) markets without capitalism. In M. O’Neill & T. Williamson (Eds.), Property-owning democracy: Rawls and beyond (pp. 75–100). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. (2017). Survey article: Philosophy and public policy after piketty: survey article: Philosophy and public policy after piketty. Journal of Political Philosophy, 25(3), 343–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Repetti, J. (2001). Democracy, taxes, and wealth. New York University Law Review, 76(3), 825-873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repetti, J. R. (2000). It’s all about valuation. Tax Law Review, 53(4), 607–614.
   Google Scholar
• Ring, D. (2002). One nation among many: Policy implications of cross-border tax arbitrage. Boston College Law Review, 44(79), 79–175.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2017). Having too much. In J. Knight & M. Schwartzberg (Eds.), Wealth (pp. 1–44). New York: New York University Press. Nomos 58.
   Google Scholar
• Rognlie, M. (2016). Deciphering the fall and rise in the net capital share: Accumulation or scarcity? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2015(1), 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Economic Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, R. H. (1994). Different rules for different players and products: The patchwork taxation of derivatives. Taxes, 72, 1031–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Schenk, D. H. (1995). Foreword: Colloquium on wealth transfer taxation. Tax Law Review, 51(3), 357-361.
   Google Scholar
• Schenk, D. H. (1999). Saving the income tax with a wealth tax. Tax Law Review, 53(3), 423–476.
   Google Scholar
• Schenk, D. H. (2004a). A positive account of the realization rule. Tax Law Review, 57(3), 355–396.
   Google Scholar
• Schenk, D. H. (2004b). An efficiency approach to reforming a realization-based tax. Tax Law Review, 57(4), 504–547.
   Google Scholar
• Schizer, D. M. (1998). Realization as subsidy. New York University Law Review, 73, 1549–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidde, D. (2009). Responding to the subprime mess: The new regulatory landscape. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 14(4), 709–770.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes, M. S. (2009). Taxes and business strategy: A planning approach (4th.), Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shakow, D. J. (1986). Taxation without realization: A proposal for accrual taxation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 134(5), 1111-1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakow, D. J. (2016). A wealth tax: Taxing the estates of the living. Boston College Law Review, 57(3), 947–978.
   Google Scholar
• Shakow, D. J., & Shuldiner, R. (2000). A comprehensive wealth tax. Tax Law Review, 53, 499–585.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, D. N. (2000). Commentary inequality, wealth, and endowment. Tax Law Review, 53, 397-422.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, S., Fleming, C., & Peroni, R. (2016). R&D tax incentives: Growth panacea or budget trojan horse. Tax Law Review, 69(3), 419–458.
   Google Scholar
• Shoven, J. B., & Taubman, P. (1980). Savings, capital income, and taxation. In H. J. Aaron & M. J. Boskin (Eds.), The economics of taxation. Studies of government finance: Second series. (pp. 203-220). Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Shuldiner, R. (1992). A general approach to the taxation of financial instruments. Texas Law Review, 71(2), 243-350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikka, P., & Willmott, H. (2010). The dark side of transfer pricing: Its role in tax avoidance and wealth retentiveness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4), 342–356.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. C. (1938). Personal income taxation: The definition of income as a problem of fiscal policy. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, K. J. (2005). Enslaving the beachcomber: Some thoughts on the liberty objections to endowment taxation. The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 18(01), 47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (2014). Reforming taxation to promote growth and equity. New York: Roosevelt Institute. White Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The price of inequality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Surrey, S. S., & McDaniel, P. R. (1985). Tax expenditures. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. (2015). A moral and economic critique of the new property-owning democrats: On behalf of a Rawlsian welfare state. Philosophical Studies, 172(2), 283–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. (2019). Rawls, Piketty, and the critique of welfare-state capitalism. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Apeldoorn, L. (2018). BEPS, tax sovereignty and global justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 21(4), 478–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. E. (2016). Politics as a peculiar business: Insights from a theory of entangled political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Walras, L. (2010). Elements of pure economics. Reprinted [der Ausg.] 2003. History of economic thought 20. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weisbach, D. A. (1999). Formalism in the tax law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 66(3), 860–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijtvliet, L. (2014). Too little, too late: The uneasy case for a wealth tax as a means to mitigate inequality. Intertax, 42(10), 632–643.
   Google Scholar
• Wollner, G. (2014). Justice in finance: The normative case for an international financial transaction tax: Justice in finance. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(4), 458–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelenak, L. (2006). Taxing endowment. Duke Law Journal, 55, 1145–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar